Communication
with the reactivity of the in-situ formed gold–carbenoid inter-
mediates from 1,n-diynes, including cyclopropenation/Nazarov
cyclization,[3l] gold–carbene transfer,[2a] and [2+2+1] cycloaddi-
tion with aldehydes.[3k]
drolysis with a trace amount of water (entry 6). The reaction
could also proceed in 1,2-dichloroethane, with a slight lower
yield of 2a (76%, entry 7). However, switching the solvent to
toluene did not give satisfactory results (entry 8). The frequent-
ly used gold(I) complexes such as [Au(IPr)]SbF6, [Au(PPh3)]SbF6,
or [Au(PPh3)]NTf2 were not effective for this transformation,
and the diyne 1a remained in 24–73% (entries 9–11). The re-
sults indicated that the nature of the ligand on gold catalyst
played an important role in this cascade reaction. Interestingly,
when a gold(III) complex, such
Based on the superior catalytic activity of [Au(Johnphos)
(MeCN)]SbF6 (catalyst A) in various gold-catalyzed reactions,
we first investigated the cycloisomerization of benzene-
bridged 1,6-diynyl acetate 1a in the presence of catalyst A.
The results are shown in Table 1. We were pleased to see that
as [AuCl2(Pic)], was used as the
Table 1. Optimization studies for the formation of 1,4-dihydrocyclopenta[b]indole 2a.
catalyst, a-acyl-a,b-unsaturated
4a was obtained exclusively in
88% yield with a E geometry of
the double bond[11] (entry 12).
The formation of 4a can be ra-
tionalized by a gold-catalyzed
tandem 3,3-rearrangement/oxo-
carbenium ion formation/acyl-
migration process similar to that
previously reported for gold(III)-
catalyzed acyl migration of prop-
argylic esters by Zhang et al.[12]
Entry
Cat. (5 mol%)
[Substrate] [m]
Solvent
t [h]
Yield [%][a]
2a
1a
3a[b]
1
2
3
4
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.1
0.03
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.015
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
ClCH2CH2Cl
toluene
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
3
4
4
5
1
4
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
9
24
38
73
–
68
75
80
83
83
56
76
–
–
–
–
–
5
–
6[c]
7
25 (only E)
–
58 (52:6)
35 (only E)
22 (19:3)
–
Control
experiments
with
AgSbF6 alone could not afford
the desired 2a (entry 13). The
structure of 1,4-dihydrocyclopen-
ta[b]indole product 2 was con-
firmed by X-ray crystallographic
analyses of 2a, 2i, and 2m[13]
(vide infra). Apparently, a formal
1,2-OAc migration took place
during the reaction according to
the structure of product 2.
8[d]
9[d,e]
10[d,f]
11
12[g]
13[d]
[AuCl(IPr)]/AgSbF6
[AuCl(PPh3)]/AgSbF6
[Au(PPh3)]NTf2
[AuCl2(Pic)]
AgSbF6
–
–
–
–
–
76
–
7 (3:4)
[a] Isolated yields. All the reactions were carried out on 0.3 mmol scale in the presence of 75 mg 4ꢁ MS.
[b] The ratio of E/Z isomers is shown in parentheses. [c] Without MS. [d] 1H NMR spectroscopic yields using
CH2Br2 as the internal standard. [e] 25% 4a was also formed. [f] 4% 4a was also formed. [g] 4a was isolated in
88% yield. IPr=1,3-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazol-2-ylidene; Pic=2-picolinate.
We chose the reaction condi-
tions shown in Table 1, entry 4
to examine the scope of this
novel cascade reaction. The re-
sults are shown in Table 2. The
effect of the protection groups
was examined first. Ac and Piv,
treatment of 1a with 5 mol% of catalyst A and 4 ꢁ molecular
sieves in dichloromethane at room temperature for 3 h ena-
bled complete consumption of 1a to afford 3-acyloxy-1,4-dihy-
drocyclopenta[b]indole 2a in 68% yield (Table 1, entry 1). It
was noticed that some amounts of colored byproducts were
also formed during the process according to TLC analysis. We
reasoned that the concentration of the substrates may have an
effect on the reaction course. To our delight, decreasing the
substrate concentration from 0.1 to 0.03m improved the yield
of 2a to 75% (entry 2). Further decreasing the substrate con-
centration to 0.015 or 0.01m resulted in the significant im-
provement of the product yield, as the same 83% yields of 2a
were obtained (entries 4–5). Performing the reaction in the ab-
sence of molecular sieves led to 2a in 56% yield, along with
25% of undesired a,b-unsaturated imide 3a formed by 3,3-re-
arrangement of the propargyl acetate moiety followed by hy-
as well as Bz groups, could be well-accommodated in this reac-
tion, leading to 2a–c in 50–83% yields. The presence of a steri-
cally demanding Piv group in 1b gave 2b in moderate yield of
50%, which indicated that the reaction is sensitive to the bulki-
ness of the migrating group. Propargyl carbonate 1d also un-
derwent the reaction smoothly to furnish 2d in 79% yield.
Next, we examined the effect of R3 group on the alkyne termi-
nus. The reaction applied to a wide variety of aryl-substituted
alkynes, and the functionalities of Cl-, F-, Me-, MeO-, and 3,4,5-
(MeO)3 groups on aromatic rings were tolerated well during
the reaction, affording the corresponding products 2e–i and
2k in good to high yields. Especially, sterically encumbered o-
MeO-substituted substrate 1i was smoothly converted into the
corresponding 2i in a good yield of 76%. A thienyl group
could also be incorporated successfully into the sequence, pro-
viding 2j in 86% yield. Substrate 1l bearing a cyclohexenyl
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1009 – 1013
1010
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim