chiral sultams,8 have afforded relatively good diastereose-
lectivity and yield. Recently, we reported9 the highly
diastereoselective allylation of chiral hydrazones bearing an
oxazolidinone auxiliary introduced by Friestad.10 This offered
advantages in diastereoselectivity and reaction rate over the
fluoride-promoted allylsilane addition to chiral hydrazones
reported by Friestad, particularly for aliphatic aldehyde-
derived hydrazones. To date, allylsilanes have been most
successful for stereoselective allylation of acylhydrazone
derivatives. Using CuCl and chiral ligands with allyltri-
methoxysilane, Friestad has observed measurable but low
(9.7% ee) selectivity.11 The enantioselective allyation of
acylhydrazones using chirally modified allyl silanes has been
reported by Leighton,12 and high selectivity (∼85-97% ee)
was obtained in most cases. Chiral sulfoxide-promoted
allylation of hydrazones with allyltrichlorosilane has been
reported using an excess of the promoter in up to 93% ee.13
In addition, Kobayashi has demonstrated that chiral BINAP
oxides could promote this reaction using substoichiometric
amounts (20 mol %, 56% ee; 40 mol %, 69% ee).14 Chiral
bis-allylpalladium catalysts have also been employed in
enantioselective allylation of imines with allylsilanes and
allylstannanes with good to high ee (up to 94%).15
So far, the utility of allylindium in enantioselective
allylations has been very limited. Considering the excellent
success obtained in the addition of allylindium reagents
toward chiral hydrazones,9 we sought to develop the enan-
tioselective variation of this reaction. We began by surveying
several chiral additives (Scheme 1) such as bisoxazoline
ligands, chiral amino alcohols, chiral diamine derivatives,
etc. with the benzaldehyde-derived achiral hydrazone 1a. The
reaction was carried out with 2 equiv of the chiral additive,
2 equiv of indium metal, and 3 equiv of allyl iodide. Most
resulted in very low selectivity or sluggish reactions.
However, similar to Loh’s report, the use of 2 equiv of (-)-
cinchonidine afforded good enantioselectivity (80% ee).
Unfortunately, the yield was very poor. Addition of In(OTf)3
Scheme 1
Lewis acid improved the reaction to 85% yield; however,
this was detrimental to the selectivity (29% ee). Chiral diols,
particularly (R)-BINOL, afforded modest yield and selectiv-
ity.16 This prompted us to investigate other BINOL deriva-
tives to optimize the reaction. The 3,3′-diiodoBINOL resulted
in an improvement in selectivity, and the 3,3′-bistrifluorom-
ethyl-BINOL17 (3) derivative performed the best, affording
a 72% yield of 2a in 70% ee. THF was the best solvent
examined; very low yields and selectivities were observed
in CH2Cl2 (20% yield, 7% ee), and no reaction was observed
in CH3CN. This may be attributed to the lack of generation
of the active allylindium reagent as evidenced by remaining
unreacted In(0). Water appeared to be detrimental to the
enantioselectivity, and optimal results were obtained with
the addition of 4 Å molecular sieves (45% ee without 4 Å
MS). The concentration was also critical for success of the
reaction and was optimal at 0.17 M in substrate. When the
reaction was either diluted or concentrated by a factor of 2,
lower enantioselectivity was obtained (45 and 67% ee,
respectively). This is difficult to rationalize, but may be due
to varying disproportionation between organoindium species
of different oxidation states.12
After successful reactivity and selectivity were established
for the allylation of hydrazone 1a using excess ligand, the
stoichiometry of the chiral additive and the substrate scope
of the reaction were investigated. Results are summarized
in Table 1. We were gratified to find that the reaction of 1a
could be carried out with good selectivity employing only
10 mol % of the ligand, 1.1 equiv of In(0), and 1.5 equiv of
allyl iodide, giving 2a in 70% ee and 77% yield. Addition-
ally, the stoichiometric reaction improved under these
conditions as well (84% ee). Para-substituted derivatives
performed even better, as demonstrated by substrates 1b-
d. The π-donor substituents, Cl and OMe, afforded greater
(7) (a) Basile, T.; Bocoum, A.; Savoia, D.; Umani-Ronchi, A.J. Org.
Chem. 1994, 59, 7766. (b) Loh, T.-P.; Ho, D. S.-C.; Xu, K.-C.; Sim, K.-Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 865. (c) Vilaivan, T.; Winotapan, C.; Ban-
phavichit, V.; Shinada, T.; Ohfune, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 3464.
(8) (a) Lee, J. G.; Choi, K. I.; Pae, A. N.; Koh, H. Y.; Kang, Y.; Cho,
Y. S. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 1314. (b) Miyabe, H.; Nishimura,
A.; Ueda, M.; Naito, T. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1454. (c) Miyabe, H.;
Yamaoka, Y.; Naito, T.; Takemoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6745. (d)
Miyabe, H.; Yamaoka, Y.; Naito, T.; Takemoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004,
69, 1415.
(9) Cook, G. R.; Maity, B.; Kargbo, R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1741.
(10) Friestad, G. K.; Ding, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4491
and refs cited therein. Recently, Friestad and co-workers have improved
on the hydrazine cleavage method, improving the utility of these auxiliaries.
See: Ding, H.; Friestad, G. K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 637.
(11) Ding, H.; Friestad, G. K. Synthesis 2004, 2216.
(12) (a) Berger, R.; Rabbat, P. M. A.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 9596. (b) Berger, R.; Duff, K.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 5686.
(13) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Ogawa, C.; Konishi, H.; Sugiura, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 6610. (b) Ferna´ndez, I.; Valdivia, V.; Gori, B.; Alcudia,
F.; AÄ lvarez, E.; Khiar, N. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1307.
(14) Ogawa, C.; Sugiura, M.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 6491.
(15) (a) Fernandes, R. A.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 735.
(b) Bao, M.; Nakamura, H.; Yamamoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
131. (c) Nakamura, H.; Nakamura, K.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 0, 4242. (d) Nakamura, K.; Nakamura, H.; Yamamoto, Y. J.
Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 2614.
(16) Recently, Loh has reported high selectivity using an In(OTf)3-
BINOL Lewis acid and allylstannanes: Teo, Y.-C.; Tan, K.-T.; Loh, T.-P.
Chem. Commun. 2005, 1318.
(17) Chong, J. M.; Shen, L.; Wu, T. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2701.
2768
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 13, 2005