amino group was then protected with Boc2O in dioxane and
water (3:1) to give the cyclopentenol 12, plus a minor product
(probably a diastereoisomer, ratio ) 90:10), which was
separated by MPLC (87% yield of 12 from 10). To act as a
leaving group, the hydroxy group was acetylated with acetic
anhydride in pyridine with a catalytic amount of DMAP
to provide the cyclopentenyl acetate 13 in 97% yield
(Scheme 3).
The acetate 13 was added dropwise to the methyl cuprate,21
prepared from 5 equiv of CuCN and 10 equiv of MeMgBr
in diethyl ether, and provided compound 14 in 88% yield
with a ratio of 88:12 (Scheme 4). The minor product,
Scheme 4. Synthesis of Carbafuranomycin 2
Scheme 3. Synthesis of the Cyclopentenyl Acetate 13 Starting
with 1,3-Dipolar Nitrile Oxide Cycloaddition
probably the regioisomer from the competing SN2 reaction,
was not identified. The isomer ratio was improved from 88:
12 to >95:5 by recrystallizing the diol 15 (vide infra). For
this substitution, 5 equiv of the “higher order” cyanocuprate
were required, probably because of the additional functional
groups in 13 with complexing ability. Experiments with less
cuprate proceeded too slowly or with incomplete reaction.
For the next step, twofold O-debenzylation, catalytic
hydrogenation was presumed to be incompatible with the
For the next step, the key introduction of the methyl group,
use of an organocuprate seemed promising. Organocuprates19
are known to react with suitable cyclic systems in an SN2′
fashion, i.e., nucleophilic attack at the position γ to the
leaving goup, with relocation of the double bond.20 Further-
more, anti attack is stereochemically favored.20 On this basis,
we assumed that the required methylcyclopentenyl moiety
might be obtained with the correct regio- and stereochemical
preference.
(19) For reviews on organocuprates, see: (a) Krause, N. Modern
Organocopper Chemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2002. (b) Normant, J.
F. Synthesis 1972, 63-80. (c) Posner, G. An Introduction to Synthesis Using
Organocopper Reagents; Wiley: New York, 1980. (d) Yamamoto, Y.
Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 945-957; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986,
25, 947-959. (e) Nakamura, E. Synlett 1991, 539-547. (f) Lipshutz, B.;
Sengupta, S. Org. React. 1992, 41, 135-631. (g) Taylor, R. Organocopper
Reagents; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1994. (h) Lipshutz, B. In
ComprehensiVe Organometallic Chemistry II; Abel, E. W., Ed.; Perga-
mon: Oxford, 1995; Vol. 12, pp 59-130. (i) Krause, N.; Gerold, A. Angew.
Chem. 1997, 109, 194-213; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 186-
204. (j) Ibuka, Y.; Yamamoto, Y. Synlett 1992, 769-777.
(20) (a) Goering, H. L.; Singleton, V. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98,
7854-7855. (b) Claesson, A.; Olsson, L. I. Chem. Commun. 1978, 621-
623. (c) Gendreau, Y.; Normant, J. F. Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 1517-1521.
(d) Roberts, S. M.; Woolley, G. T.; Newton, R. F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1981, 1729-1733. (e) Goering, H. L.; Singleton, V. D. J. Org.
Chem. 1983, 48, 1531-1533. (f) Corey, E. J.; Boaz, N. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1984, 25, 3063-3066. (g) Curran, D. P.; Chen, M.-H.; Leszczweski,
D.; Elliott, R. L.; Rakiewicz, D. M. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 51, 1612-1614.
(h) Tseng, C. C.; Yen, S.-Y.; Goering, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 2892-
2895. (i) Tseng, C. C.; Paisley, S. D.; Goering, H. L. J. Org. Chem. 1986,
51, 2884-2891. (j) Ito, M.; Matsuumi, M.; Murugesh, M. G.; Kobayashi,
Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5881-5889. (k) Kobayashi, Y.; Ito, M.; Igarashi,
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 4829-4832.
(17) (a) Such large, consistent differences in optical rotation had been
noted earlier with each one of some 60 5- and 4,5-cis-substituted isoxazolines
whose absolute configuration had been established by chemical correlation
and/or crystal structure analyses; see refs 7, 16a, 18b, and 18c. For example,
in the furanomycin series, the respective furoisoxazolines (methylfuran
adducts of the nitrile oxide generated from 6 in a 60:40 ratio) showed
[R]2D0) -171 for the (3aS,6aS,1′S)-isomer (“anti”), corresponding to 10,
and [R]2D0 ) +199 for the (3aR,6aR,1′S)-diastereomer (“syn”), corre-
sponding to 11; see ref 7. (b) Mu¨ller, R. Dissertation, Universita¨t Wu¨rzburg,
Wu¨rzburg, Germany, 1992. (c) Leibold, T. Dissertation, Universita¨t Stuttgart,
Stuttgart, Germany, 1995.
(18) (a) Mu¨ller, I.; Ja¨ger, V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 4777-4780. (b)
Ja¨ger, V.; Mu¨ller, I.; Paulus, E. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 2997-3000. (c)
Ja¨ger, V.; Mu¨ller, I. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3519-3528. (d) Schaller, C.;
Vogel, P.; Ja¨ger, V. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 314, 25-35. (e) For a recent
review, see: Ja¨ger, V.; Colinas, P. In Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar
Cycloaddition Chemistry Towards Heterocycles and Natural Products;
Padwa, A., Pearson, W. H., Eds.; Wiley: New York, 2002; Vol. 59, Chapter
6: Nitrile Oxide, pp 361-472.
(21) To a solution of 5 equiv of CuCN in diethyl ether at -20 °C was
added 10 equiv of CH3MgBr in diethyl ether (3.0 M). After 20 min at -20
°C, the acetate 13 in diethyl ether was added slowly and kept for 1.5 h at
-20 °C.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 12, 2005
2319