N. Tang, X. Song, T. Yang et al.
Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 942 (2021) 121820
Scheme 1. Synthesis of ligand of C6H2(CH2NMe2)2Br2 (1).
ray single crystal diffraction analysis was performed over SMART-
APEX and RASA-7A by Shanghai Institute Organic Chemistry, China
Academy of Science. The acidity was measured by Hammett indi-
cator method as described previously [45]. Acid strength was ex-
pressed in terms of Hammett acidity function (Ho) as scaled by pKa
value of the indicators.
Then the mixture was stirred at −60 °C for 1 hour and then the
reacting temperature was gradually increased to RT and stirred for
another 1 hour. The resulted mixture was setting in −80 °C bath
and was added with Ph2SbCl (3.787 mmol) in Et2O (8 mL) solu-
tion. After that, the mixture was stirred at −80 °C for 1 hour and
then the reacting temperature was gradually increased to RT and
stirred for another 1 hour. The final obtained mixture was evap-
orated and extracted with CH2Cl2 and evaporated again. The re-
sulted residue was subjected to column chromatograph on silica
gel (PE/EA = 20/1), and 111 mg white solid as pure product was
obtained (yield 9%). mp:224−227 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz,
TMS): δH (400 MHz; CDCl3; TMS) 7.43 (10H, t, J = 3.6 Hz, one Ph
of Ph2Sb), 7.26 (10H, t, J = 2.0 Hz, another Ph of Ph2Sb), 7.02 (2H, s,
ArH), 3.24(4H, s, 2CH2), 1.81(12H, s, 2NMe2); δC (100 MHz; CDCl3;
TMS) 143.6, 142.3, 140.7, 136.6, 136.1, 128.3, 127.6, 64.9, 43.7.
2.2. Synthesis and spectral data of precursor of 1 (Scheme 1)
2.2.1. Synthesis of p-C6H2(CH3)2Br2 (1b)
ao a 250 mL round flask was added 1,4-dimethylbenzene (1a)
(73.9 mL, 600 mmol), then the initiator of I2 was added and fol-
lowed with liquid bromine (66.0 mL,1280 mmol) by drop at 0 °C.
The resulting mixture was stirred in the absence of light for 8 h
at 0 °C to RT. After that, the mixture was washed with saturated
NaOH solution. Next, it was filtrated and the crude white solid
product was obtained. The pure white powder was obtained after
recrystallisation in anhydrous EtOH solution (yield 80%). mp:71−72
2−
(3)
2.3.2. Synthesis of [C6H2(CH2NHMe2SbPh2)2]2+[OSO2C8F17
]
To a 50 mL tube was added (0.2052 g, 0.276 mmol) and
C8F17 SO3H (0.2765 g, 0.552 mmol). After vacuum and refund-
ing nitrogen for 3 times, the mixture was added anhydrous THF
(5 mL) and anhydrous CH3CN (5 mL) and stirred at RT for 2 h.
The resulting mixture was evaporated and the white solid was
hence obtained (yield 95%). mp:150−151 °C; δH (400 MHz; CDCl3;
TMS) 9.451 (2H, s, ArH), 7.37−7.40 (20H, s, 2(Ph2Sb)), 4.20 (4H, d,
J = 3.6 Hz, 2CH2), 2.64 (12H, d, J = 4.8 Hz, 2NMe2); δC (100 MHz;
CDCl3; TMS) 145.3, 140.8, 136.3, 136.1, 130.9, 129.6, 129.6, 113.9,
110.9, 110.3, 108.2, 68.2, 62.9, 43.2, 30.4, 19.5, 14.1. Elemental Anal-
ysis calculation (%) for C52H40F34N2O6S2Sb2: C, 35.84; H, 2.31;
found: C, 35.91; H, 2.26.
°C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, TMS): δ = 7.4 (2H, s), 2.3 (6H, s) ;13
NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz, TMS); δ = 137.2, 135.9, 122.9, 23.1.
C
2.2.2. Synthesis of C6H2(CH2Br)2Br2 (1c)
To a two-necked round flask was added compound 1b (52.7 g,
ꢀ
200 mmol), NBS (71.2 g, 400 mmol), 1,1 - azobis (cyanocyclohex-
ane) (0.1 g). After vacuum and refunding nitrogen for three times,
the CCl4 (800 mL) was added. After the resulting mixture was
stirred at RT for 1 hour, it was elevated to refluxing until the
1b was consumed and monitored by TLC analysis. Then the re-
sulting mixture was filtrated at room temperature and washed
with CH2Cl2. The combined CH2Cl2 layer was washed with brine
for 3 times and filtrated, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, evapo-
rated and recrystallized in anhydrous EtOH. The white needles
solid product was obtained (yield 43%). mp:156−158 °C; 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz, TMS): δ = 7.7 (2H, s),4.5 (4H, s);13C NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz, TMS): δ = 138.0, 134.3, 122.3, 30.5.
2−
2.3.3. Synthesis of [C6H2(CH2NHMe2SbPh2)2]2+[ClO4]
(4)
To a 50 mL tube was added complex 2 (0.2052 g, 0.276 mmol)
and HClO4 (0.055 g, 0.552 mmol). After three cycles of vacuum-
and-nitrogen purging, the mixture was added anhydrous THF
(5 mL) and anhydrous CH3CN (5 mL), and the resulted mixture was
stirred at RT for 2 h. The resulted mixture was subject to evapora-
tion to afford the formation of a white solid (yield 94%). mp > 300
°C; δH (400 MHz; acetone-d6; TMS) 7.67 (2H, s, ArH), 7.39−7.51
(20H, s, 2(Ph2Sb)), 4.71 (4H, s, 2CH2), 2.92 (12H, s, 2NMe2). Ele-
mental Analysis calculation (%) for C36H40Cl2N2O8Sb2: C, 45.85; H,
4.27; found: C, 45.89; H, 4.20.
2.2.3. Synthesis of C6H2(CH2NMe2)2Br2 (1)
To a 250 mL two-necked round flask was added compound 1c
(8.435 g, 20.0 mmol). After vacuum and refunding nitrogen for 3
times, then the Me2NH in ether solution (100 mL, 320 mmol) was
added and stirred for 4 h at RT. Then washed with water and dried
with Na2SO4, filtrated and evaporated. The resulted residue was re-
crystallized in petroleum ether and the white solid was hence ob-
tained (yield 81%). mp:74−75 °C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, TMS):
δ = 7.6 (2H, s), 3.5 (4H, s), 2.3 (12H, s), 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz,
TMS): δ = 138.5, 134.4, 134.1, 123.3, 62.5, 45.5, 45.4.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Physicochemical properties
The complexes 2 − 4 remain intact in the open air for a test
period of one year. The Lewis acidity of complexes 2 − 4 as esti-
mated by the Hammett indicator method are 6.8 < Ho < 7.2, 4.8 <
Ho < 6.8 and 4.8 < Ho <6.8 (Ho is Hammett acidity function), re-
spectively (detail procedure see SI), indicating that there is increase
of Lewis acidity with the incorporation of HX. According to the
colour change of indicators, complex 3 is in fact higher than com-
2.3. Synthesis and spectral data of precursor of 2–4 (Scheme 2)
2.3.1. Synthesis of catalyst C6H2(CH2NMe2SbPh2)2 (2)
To a 50 mL tube was added compound 1 (0.631 g, 1.803 mmol),
after vacuum and refunding nitrogen for 3 times, 10 mL anhydrous
Et2O was added, until the compound 1 was completely dissolved
in Et2O. The solution was setting in −60 °C and the 2.4 M n-BuLi
(1.58 mL, 3.787 mmol) in hexane was dropping added with syringe.
−
plex 4 in Lewis acidity, in agreement with the fact that C8F17 SO3
−
is higher than ClO4 in electron-withdrawing ability. The TG-DSC
result shows that complex 3 is thermal stable up to 150 °C (Fig. 1).
2