strategy is based on a free-radical carboazidation6 of a chiral
allylsilane as a key step,7 the silicon group being used both
to ensure a high level of 1,2-stereocontrol8 and as a latent
hydroxy group.9
As the absolute configuration of natural hyacinthacine A1
was unknown, we envisioned two different routes starting
from diastereomeric allylsilanes 6 and 7 that could lead to
both enantiomers of 3 (Scheme 2). Disconnection of 3 and
The scope of the carboazidation reaction was studied using
enantiomerically pure allylsilanes 10a-c, easily obtained
through Roush allylation of aldehyde 9.11 We first observed
that better yields were obtained when the alcohol function
â to silicon (C2) was protected. A rapid survey of the reaction
conditions and variation of the protective group was thus
carried out, the results of which are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Free-Radical Carboazidation of Allylsilanes 10a-c
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic Analysis
olefin
(equiv)
xanthate
(equiv)
t
yield
(%)c
entry
(°C)
syn/anti
1
2
3
4
5
10a (2)
10a (2)
10a (1)
10b (2)
10c (2)
1
1
2
1
1
80
60
60
60
60
84:16a
85:15a,b
70:30a
80:20a
61:39a
74
84
87
30
52
1
a Ratio estimated from H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. b Ratio
estimated from 28Si NMR of the crude reaction mixture. c Isolated yield.
The acetate group afforded the best results, with the syn-
carboazidation product 11a obtained as the major isomer with
reasonable diastereocontrol (Table 1, entries 1 and 2).12
Interestingly, lowering the temperature led to no change in
the diastereocontrol but gave consistently better yields,
indicating that some of the carboazidation product may be
decomposed at 80 °C (Table 1, entry 2). The reaction is
generally best carried out using 2 equiv of allylsilane for 1
equiv of xanthate, the excess of allylsilane being recovered
by chromatography. Reversal of the ratio also led to good
yield, albeit with slightly lower diastereocontrol (Table 1,
entry 3).
The use of a MOM ether (i.e., 10c) gave modest diaste-
reocontrol and lower yield, probably because of hydrogen
abstraction on the MOM group (vide infra). The benzoate
10b, which was difficult to isolate in pure form, also afforded
a small amount of carboazidation product. Finally, the use
of 3-pyridylsulfonyl azide (PyrSO2N3) instead of PhSO2N3
made the purification of the products easier and provided
higher yields.13 The study was next extended to the car-
boazidation of the acetate-protected anti/syn allylsilane 12.
Surprisingly, reaction under the above optimized conditions
led to azide 14 as a single isomer (stereochemistry not
determined at the anomeric center) and no trace of the
ent-3 thus reveals that both rings should be formed late in
the synthesis, with the ring closure occurring from intermedi-
ates 4 and 5, having the four contiguous stereogenic centers
correctly set up. The configuration of the C3 center would
be imposed by the use of aldehyde 9, readily available from
D-mannitol.10 Intermediates 4 and 5 would be accessible
through carboazidation of allylsilanes 6 and 7, followed by
Tamao-Fleming oxidation of the PhMe2Si group with
retention of configuration. Reduction of the azido group of
4 or 5 with concomitant ring closure would then lead to 3
or ent-3.6b,c While ring closure from mesylate 5 is expected
to occur with inversion of configuration at C3, leading to
ent-3, the synthesis of 3 from 4 would require a double
inversion (retention) at C3. This study showed that a careful
choice of the alcohol protective groups and the inversion of
the C3 configuration prior to ring closure were critical for
completion of the total synthesis of 3.
(6) (a) Ollivier, C.; Renaud, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4717-
4727. (b) Ollivier, C.; Renaud, P.; Penchaud, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 3460-3462. (c) Panchaud, P.; Ollivier, C.; Renaud, P.; Zigmantas,
S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2755-2759.
(7) Chabaud, L.; Landais, Y.; Renaud, P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4257-
4260.
(8) Chabaud, L.; James, P.; Landais, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3173-
(11) Roush, W. R.; Grover, P. T. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1981-1998.
(12) Relative configuration of our products were determined through a
stereospecific fluoride-mediated â-elimination of the â-silyl azide; see: (a)
Masterson, D. S.; Porter, N. D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4253-4256. (b) Chabaud,
L.; Landais, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6995-6998.
3199.
(9) (a) Fleming, I. Chemtracts: Org. Chem. 1996, 1-64. (b) Landais,
Y.; Jones, G. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7599-7662. (c) Tamao, K. In AdVances
in Silicon Chemistry; Jai Press Inc.: Greenwich, 1996; Vol. 3, pp 1-62.
(10) Schmid, C. R.; Bryant, J. D. Org. Synth. 1995, 72, 6-13.
(13) Panchaud, P.; Renaud, P. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 34, 925-928.
2588
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 13, 2005