TABLE 1. Cyclodimerization Attempts with 9a To Give 10a
reagents
solvent
concn (mM)
temp (°C)
time
yield (%)
CuI/DBU
toluene
2.5
2.5
rt, then 85
24 h, then 16 h
16 h
0
0
CuI/DBU
toluene
toluene
THF
50
CuI/DIPEA
2.5
45
6 days
0
CuI/DIPEA
2.5
45
7 days
16
45
20
64
9
CuI/DIPEA
THF
0.25
2.5
45
28 days
CuI/DIPEA
CH3CN
CH3CN
t-BuOH/H2O 4:1
45
24 h
CuI/DIPEA
0.25
2.5
45
3 days
CuSO4/sodium ascorbate
rt, then 70
48 h, then 7 days
was concentrated. The product was purified with flash chroma-
tography (toluene/EtOAc 2:5, Rf ) 0.25) followed by size-
exclusion chromatography to give 9a (333 mg, 67%) as a white
foam. [R]22D -16 (c 0.5, DMSO); 1H NMR (MeOH-d4, 400 MHz)
δ 7.87 (m, 4H, Bz-o), 7.52 (m, 2H, Bz-p), 7.37 (m, 4H, Bz-m),
6.98 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H, Tyr-Hδ), 6.83 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H, Tyr-
ꢀ
Hδ), 6.68 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H, Tyr-H ), 6.55 (d, J ) 8.5 Hz, 2H,
ꢀ
Tyr-H ), 5.69 (dd, J ) 10.6 Hz, J ) 9.4 Hz, 1H, H-3), 5.37 (t, J
) 9.6 Hz, 1H, H-4), 4.73 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-1), 4.51 (dd, J )
9.4 Hz, J ) 5.2 Hz, 1H, Tyr-HR), 4.43 (dd, J ) 9.0 Hz, J ) 4.8
Hz, 1H, Tyr-HR), 4.18 (dd, J ) 10.6 Hz, J ) 8.4 Hz, 1H, H-2),
4.07 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.56 (s, 1H, CH), 3.54 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.50 (m,
1H, H-6), 3.37 (dd, J ) 13.5 Hz, J ) 2.6 Hz, 1H, H-6), 2.91 (dd,
J ) 14.1 Hz, J ) 5.1 Hz, 1H, Tyr-Hâ), 2.80 (dd, J ) 14.1 Hz, J
) 4.8 Hz, 1H, Tyr-Hâ), 2.64 (dd, J ) 14.2 Hz, J ) 9.4 Hz, 1H,
Tyr-Hâ), 2.48 (dd, J ) 14.1 Hz, J ) 9.0 Hz, 1H, Tyr-Hâ); HRMS
(FAB) calcd for C42H40N6O11Na (M + Na) 827.2653, found
827.2666.
Protected Tyr-Tyr-Containing Macrocycle (10a). Com-
pound 9a (50.0 mg, 62.1 µmol) was dissolved in CH3CN (250
mL) and CuI (3.5 mg, 19 µmol) and DIPEA (11 µL, 62 µmol)
were added. The mixture was stirred at 45 °C under N2 for 72
h and then concentrated. The residue was suspended in CH2-
Cl2/MeOH 1:1 and filtered through Celite. The filtrate was
concentrated and the product was purified with flash chroma-
tography (CH2Cl2/MeOH 10:1, Rf ) 0.18) to give 10a (31.9 mg,
64%) as a white amorphous solid. [R]21D -49 (c 0.5, DMSO); 1H
NMR (DMSO-d6, 300 MHz) δ 9.09 (s, 4H, Tyr-OH), 8.58 (d, J )
9.0 Hz, 2H, NH), 8.51 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz, 2H, NH), 8.41 (s, 2H,
triazole), 7.92 (m, 6H, Bz-o + NH), 7.79 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 4H, Bz-
o), 7.65 (m, 4H, Bz-p), 7.53 (t, J ) 7.7 Hz, 4H, Bz-m), 7.46 (t, J
) 7.5 Hz, 4H, Bz-m), 6.82 (d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 4H, Tyr-Hδ), 6.79 (d,
FIGURE 1. Superimposed structures of the 25 conformers
with lowest energy found in the conformational search with
11b (left) and the global minimum shown alone (right). Similar
results were obtained with 11a.
Conformational searches carried out on macrocycles
11a,b in MacroModel 8.5 (MMFFs force field in water,
all backbone torsions were selected for variation, 20 000
steps) show that the strategy to incorporate 1,2,3-
triazoles into macrocyclic carbohydrate/amino acid hy-
brids in order to obtain more rigid macrocycles with more
open structures is valid. The low-energy conformers of
macrocycles 11a,b have relatively open structures with
a central cavity (Figure 1), whereas our previous macro-
cycles with three amino acids, instead of one 1,2,3-triazole
and two amino acids, had formed collapsed structures.4
In conclusion, the work herein describes the first
synthesis of C2-symmetic carbohydrate/amino acid hybrid
macrocycles through copper(I)-catalyzed formation of
1,2,3-triazoles. The starting material for the cyclodimer-
ization can be prepared in a relatively small number of
steps, thus making this an efficient synthesis of macro-
cyclic carbohydrate/amino acid hybrid molecules. The
rigidity conferred by the triazole rings leads to open cleft-
like macrocycles as promising candidates for artificial
receptors in water.
ꢀ
J ) 8.7 Hz, 4H, Tyr-Hδ), 6.52 (d, J ) 8.7 Hz, 4H, Tyr-H ), 6.49
ꢀ
(d, J ) 8.6 Hz, 4H, Tyr-H ), 5.45 (t, J ) 9.8 Hz, 2H, H-3), 4.78
(m, 6H, H-4 + H-5 + H-6), 4.71 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2H, H-1), 4.50
(m, 4H, H-6 + Tyr-HR), 4.23 (m, 2H, Tyr-HR), 3.93 (m, 2H, H-2),
3.42 (s, 6H, OMe), 2.40 (m, 6H, Tyr-Hâ), 2.06 (t, J ) 12.3 Hz,
2H, Tyr-Hâ); HRMS (FAB) calcd for C84H80N12O22Na (M + Na)
1631.5408, found 1631.5408.
Deprotected Tyr-Tyr-Containing Macrocycle (11a). Com-
pound 10a (20.2 mg, 12.5 µmol) was dissolved in MeOH (5 mL)
and NaOMe in MeOH (1.0 M, 50 µL) was added. The solution
was stirred for 24 h, then neutralized with AcOH and concen-
trated. The product was purified using preparative HPLC (C18
column, 0 f 30% B in A over 60 min, A ) H2O + 0.1% TFA, B
) CH3CN + 0.1% TFA, tR ) 35 min) to afford 11a (9.5 mg, 63%)
as a fluffy white powder after lyophilization. [R]21 -55 (c 0.3,
D
DMSO); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δ 9.12 (s, 2H, Tyr-OH),
9.10 (s, 2H, Tyr-OH), 8.66 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 2H, NH), 8.32 (s, 2H,
triazole), 7.91 (d, J ) 9.0 Hz, 2H, NH), 7.78 (d, J ) 8.9 Hz, 2H,
NH), 7.05 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 4H, Tyr-Hδ), 6.89 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 4H,
ꢀ
Tyr-Hδ), 6.62 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz, 4H, Tyr-H ), 6.57 (d, J ) 8.3 Hz,
ꢀ
4H, Tyr-H ), 5.39 (d, J ) 5.1 Hz, 2H, OH-4), 4.87 (d, J ) 5.3 Hz,
Experimental Section
2H, OH-3), 4.65 (m, 4H, H-6), 4.46 (m, 2H, Tyr-HR), 4.36 (m,
2H, Tyr-HR), 4.15 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 2H, H-1), 3.56 (m, 2H, H-5),
3.30 (m, 4H, H-2+H-3), 3.03 (m, 8H, H-4, OMe), 2.94 (dd, J )
13.9 Hz, J ) 4.2 Hz, 2H, Tyr-Hâ), 2.69 (m, 6H, Tyr-Hâ); 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 125 MHz) δ 170.8 (Tyr-C′), 170.6 (Tyr-C′), 159.5
(triazole-C′), 155.70 (Tyr-Cú), 155.68 (Tyr-Cú), 142.0 (triazole-
C4), 130.4 (Tyr-Cδ), 129.7 (Tyr-Cδ), 127.9, 127.7, 127.4 (Tyr-Cγ,
Propiolyl-Tyr-Tyr/Azidoaminosugar Hybrid (9a). Com-
pound 8a (279 mg, 0.615 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (9.5
mL) and Et3SiH (245 µL, 1.54 mmol) and TFA (4.7 mL) were
added. The mixture was stirred for 4 h and then concentrated
together with toluene. The crude free acid and compound 5 (262
mg, 0.615 mmol) were dissolved in THF (12 mL) and HOBt (83.1
mg, 0.615 mmol) and DIC (106 µL, 0.677 mmol) were added.
After stirring for 16 h, MeOH (3 mL) was added and the mixture
ꢀ
ꢀ
Tyr-Cγ, triazole-C5), 115.0 (Tyr-C ), 114.7 (Tyr-C ), 101.7 (SAA-
C1), 73.9 (SAA-C3), 72.9 (SAA-C5), 71.0 (SAA-C4), 56.0 (Tyr-CR),
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 70, No. 12, 2005 4849