4196
M. Dakanali et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 4193–4196
6. Kikuchi, K.; Komatsu, K.; Nagano, T. Curr. Opin. Chem.
Biol. 2004, 8, 182–191.
7. Lim, N. C.; Schuster, J. V.; Porto, M. C.; Tanudra, M. A.;
of this study are very similar to those published for zinc
fluorescent sensor RF2.14 Binding by these metal ions
appears to be weak, since the presence of metals does
not reduce the fluorescence ratio of the dye and subse-
quent addition of Zn2+ to these TREN-probe solutions
enhances fluorescence. As expected, the latter effect is
cancelled in the case of paramagnetic Ni2+ and Cu2+
ions due to their fluorescence quenching properties.
Yao, L.; Freake, H. C.; Bruckner, C. Inorg. Chem. 2005,
¨
44, 2018–2030.
8. Lim, N. C.; Freake, H. C.; Bruckner, C. Chem. Eur. J.
¨
2005, 11, 38–49.
9. Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 3–
40.
10. de Silva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.;
Huxley, A. J. M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice,
T. E. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566.
In conclusion, we have synthesized a new UV-excited
fluorescent TREN-type Zn2+ indicator incorporating
the coumarin chromophore, and studied the spectral
profile of its free and Zn2+ bound forms. The compound
exhibits a Zn2+ dissociation constant of 18.0 lM. The
fluorescence spectra of the probe showed a clear shift
in excitation wavelength maxima upon Zn2+ binding,
indicating its potential use as a ratiometric zinc
indicator.
11. Selected data. Compound 1: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz):
d 7.27 (d, J = 9 Hz, 1H, Ar), 6.53 (br d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H,
Ar), 6.43 (br s, 1H, Ar), 5.91 (br s, 1H, CH3–C@CH), 3.18
(br t, J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, NHCH2), 2.79 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H,
CH2NH2), 2.73 (t, J = 5.5 Hz, 4H, NCH2), 2.58 (t,
J = 5.5 Hz, 2H, CH2N), 2.29 (s, 3H, CH3). ESI-MS
(positive ion mode): m/z 305 [M+H]+; ESI-ion trap MSn
(positive ion mode): MS2 m/z 305!288 [M+HꢀNH3]+,
MS3 m/z 288!271 [Product ion(288)ꢀNH3]+, MS4 m/z
271!214 [Product ion(271)ꢀ2C2H4ꢀHÅ]+, MS5 m/z
214!186 [Product ion(214)ꢀCO]+, MS6 m/z 186!158
[Product ion(186)ꢀC2H4]+.
Acknowledgements
12. Grynkiewicz, G.; Poenie, M.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem.
1985, 260, 3350–3440.
13. Kikuchi, K.; Urano, Y.; Higuchi, T.; Nagano, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1052–1054.
14. Burdette, S. C.; Lippard, S. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41,
6816–6823.
This project was supported by grants from the EPEAEK
program of the Greek Ministry of Education and
funded in part by a grant from NINDS (to A.R.K.).
The authors thank Professor S. Pergantis at the Univer-
sity of Crete, for his help with the ESI/MS experiments.
15. Lim, N. C.; Bruckner, C. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1094–
¨
1095.
16. Lim, N. C.; Yao, L.; Freake, H. C.; Bruckner, C. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 2251–2254.
References and notes
¨
17. NIST Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal
Complexes: Version 8.0, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
18. Prodi, L.; Bolletta, F.; Montalti, M.; Zaccheroni, N. Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 455–460.
1. Cotton, F. A.; Wilkinson, G. Advanced Inorganic Chem-
istry, 15th ed.; Wiley, 1988.
2. Cuajungco, M. P.; Lees, G. J. Neurobiol. Dis. 1977, 4, 137–
196.
19. Fabbrizzi, L.; Licchelli, M.; Parodi, L.; Poggi, A.; Tagli-
etti, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 35–39.
20. Koike, T.; Watanabe, T.; Aoki, S.; Kimura, E.; Shiro, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 12696–12703.
3. Kimura, E.; Koike, T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 179–184.
4. Jiang, P.; Guo, Z. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 205–229.
5. Chang, C. J.; Nolan, E. M.; Jaworski, J.; Burdette, S. C.;
Sheng, M.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 203–210.