C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
strates from whole cell lysates will likely require production of
anti-3 specific monoclonal antibodies, which is currently underway.
The method we report here requires a kinase to utilize ATPγS as
a phosphodonor, and although it is unclear what percentage of the
kinome can utilize ATPγS, several kinases have been shown to
thiophosphorylate their substrates (see Supporting Information Table
S5 for a partial list). Combining this purification method with as
kinase substrate labeling should provide a general route to the
identification of direct kinase substrates. Other biological questions
may be approached with tandem chemical/immunological strate-
gies,16 which are providing new routes to interrogate the proteome.
Acknowledgment. The authors are thankful to Mart Loog for
providing Mob1 and Swe1, and Justin Blethrow for Cdk1F80G/
cyclinB and assistance with early histone labeling experiments.
HeLa cells were generously provided by the NCCC. This work
was supported by a grant from the NIH (RO1 EB001987); S.L.
was supported by a NIH grant (1 F32 GM63312-01A1). We
acknowledge Dustin Maly, Matthew Simon, and Zachary Knight
for helpful comments on this manuscript. Mass spectra were
provided by the Center for Mass Spectrometry at UC-San Francisco,
supported by the NIH Division of Research Resources.
Figure 1. Recognition determinants for R-3-IgY immunoreactivity mea-
sured by western blotting; 25 ng of Swe1 or Swe1-PS was treated with
DMSO (lanes 1 and 3) or 2.5 mM PNBM in DMSO (lanes 2 and 4); 15 µg
of WCL was treated with DMSO (lane 5), 2.5 mM PNBM in DMSO (lane
6), and 25 ng of Swe1-PS plus 2.5 mM PNBM in DMSO (lane 7). Lanes
8 and 9 show coomassie staining of samples identical to 6 and 7,
respectively.
Supporting Information Available: Details for experimental
procedures, synthesis of hapten 4, ELISA data, Mob1 Western Blot,
immunoprecipitation controls, and a table of ATPγS utilizing kinases.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Manning, G.; Whyte, D. B.; Martinez, R.; Hunter, T.; Sudarsanam, S.
Science 2002, 298, 1912-1934.
(2) Hubbard, M. J.; Cohen, P. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1993, 18, 172-177.
(3) Beausoleil, S. A.; Jedrychowski, M.; Schwartz, D.; Elias, J. E.; Villen,
J.; Li, J.; Cohn, M. A.; Cantley, L. C.; Gygi, S. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2004, 101, 12130-12135.
Figure 2. Immunoprecipitation of Rh-H1-PS+PNBM measured by fluo-
rescence of the SDS-PAGE resolved immunoprecipitates. WCL* indicates
treatment with PNBM. Lanes 1-3 were treated with R-3-IgY sepharose,
and lanes 4-5 with preimmune IgY sepharose.
(4) Ficarro, S. B.; McCleland, M. L.; Stukenberg, P. T.; Burke, D. J.; Ross,
M. M.; Shabanowitz, J.; Hunt, D. F.; White, F. M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002,
20, 301-305.
(5) (a) Zhou, H.; Watts, J. D.; Aebersold, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 375-
378. (b) Oda, Y.; Nagasu, T.; Chait, B. T. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19,
379-382.
(6) (a) Zhang, H.; Zha, X.; Tan, Y.; Hornbeck, P. V.; Mastrangelo, A. J.;
Alessi, D. R.; Polakiewicz, R. D.; Comb, M. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277,
39379-39387. (b) Kane, S.; Sano, H.; Liu, S. C.; Asara, J. M.; Lane, W.
S.; Garner, C. C.; Lienhard, G. E. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 22115-
22118.
(7) (a) Polson, A. G.; Huang, L.; Lukac, D. M.; Blethrow, J. D.; Morgan, D.
O.; Burlingame, A. L.; Ganem, D. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 3175-3184. (b)
Eblen, S. T.; Kumar, N. V.; Shah, K.; Henderson, M. J.; Watts, C. K.;
Shokat, K. M.; Weber, M. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 14926-14935.
(c) Habelhah, H.; Shah, K.; Huang, L.; Burlingame, A. L.; Shokat, K.
M.; Ronai, Z. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 18090-18095. (d) Shah, K.;
Liu, Y.; Deirmengian, C.; Shokat, K. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1997, 94, 3565-3570.
(8) (a) Mahal, L. K.; Yarema, K. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 1997, 276, 1125-
1128. (b) Khidekel, N.; Arndt, S.; Lamarre-Vincent, N.; Lippert, A.;
Poulin-Kerstien, K. G.; Ramakrishnan, B.; Qasba, P. K.; Hsieh-Wilson,
L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16162-16163.
(9) Saxon, E.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 2000, 287, 2007-2010.
(10) (a) Gigant, B.; Charbonnier, J. B.; Eshhar, Z.; Green, B. S.; Knossow, M.
J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 284, 741-750. (b) Patten, P. A.; Gray, N. S.; Yang,
P. L.; Marks, C. B.; Wedemayer, G. J.; Boniface, J. J.; Stevens, R. C.;
Schultz, P. G. Science 1996, 271, 1086-1091.
immobilized on sepharose beads, were incubated with the rhodamine-
labeled proteins, washed extensively, and the bound proteins
separated by SDS-PAGE and the in-gel fluorescence was imaged.
Rh-H1-PS+PNBM bound to R-3-IgY sepharose beads but not to
preimmune IgY; Rh-H1-PS did not bind to either of the antibody
conjugated beads, verifying that successful immunoprecipitation
requires both the phosphorothioate modification and R-3-IgY
(Supporting Information Figure S4).
To examine the dynamic range of the immunoprecipitation, we
assayed the efficiency of Rh-H1-PS+PNBM recovery in the
presence of varying concentrations of PNBM alkylated cellular
proteins. R-3-IgY or preimmune IgY conjugated beads were
incubated with increasing concentrations of PNBM alkylated WCL
and a constant amount of Rh-H1-PS+PNBM. Recovery of the
Rh-H1-PS+PNBM was still possible in the presence of up to 20
mg of WCL (Figure 2, lane 3), although increasing WCL
concentrations lowered the yield. The amount of Rh-H1-PS+PNBM
present in lane 3, Figure 2, is approximately 800 fmol (∼30 ng), a
quantity suitable for identification by mass spectrometry, indicating
this technique can isolate kinase substrates in cases where the
epitope-tagged protein represents approximately 0.005% of total
protein. As the dynamic range of protein abundance in cells is
∼106,15 and since most proteins are substoichiometrically phos-
phorylated, our results suggest R-3-IgY can enrich for moderately
abundant substrates in WCL or less abundant substrates within
partially purified fractions.
(11) Mouse immune responses were weak (unpublished data).
(12) Ubersax, J. A.; Woodbury, E. L.; Quang, P. N.; Paraz, M.; Blethrow, J.
D.; Shah, K.; Shokat, K. M.; Morgan, D. O. Nature 2003, 425, 859-864.
(13) McMillan, J. N.; Theesfeld, C. L.; Harrison, J. C.; Bardes, E. S.; Lew, D.
J. Mol Biol. Cell 2002, 13, 3560-3575.
(14) Gronborg, M.; Kristiansen, T. Z.; Stensballe, A.; Andersen, J. S.; Ohara,
O.; Mann, M.; Jensen, O. N.; Pandey, A. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2002, 1,
517-527.
(15) Gygi, S. P.; Corthals, G. L.; Zhang, Y.; Rochon, Y.; Aebersold, R. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 9390-9395.
(16) (a) Moore, L. L.; Fulton, A. M.; Harrison, M. L.; Geahlen, R. L. J.
Proteome Res. 2004, 3, 1184-1190. (b) Dickerson, T. J.; Yamamoto,
N.; Ruiz, D. I.; Janda, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11446-11447.
We have described a new affinity purification method based on
sequential chemical labeling and conjugate specific antibody
recognition. Large-scale purification of unknown as kinase sub-
JA050727T
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 15, 2005 5289