Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.7 (2005)
907
OH
OTBS
O
O
OH OH
b
e
OBn
TBDPSO
R
RO
O
O
17 R = CH2OBn
18 R = CH2OH
e
O
15 R = H
16 R = TBDPS
OEt
OR
c
c
a
PMBO (CH2)13
R
d
5 R = CHO
27 R = OH
28 R = I,
a
b
7
R1
OPMB
R2
+
30 R = PMB
31 R = H
2-E-isomer
E:Z = 5:1
h
d
O
O
29 R = +PPh3I
O
O
32
TBDPSO
R
Scheme 5. (a) Ph3P, imidazole, I2, benzene, rt, 90%. (b) Ph3P,
CH3CN, reflux, 48 h, 95%. (c) NaHMDS, 2, THF, À78 ꢀC, 75%.
(d) DDQ, CH2Cl2/H2O (17:1), rt, 70%. (e) i) LiOH, THF/
MeOH/H2O, rt; ii) 2,4,6-trichlorobenzoyl chloride, i-Pr2NEt,
toluene, DMAP, 90 ꢀC; iii) TBAF/AcOH (1:1), THF, rt, 70%
in three steps.
22 R1 = OTBDPS, R2 = SO2Ph
23 R1 = OTBDPS, R2 = H
19 R = CO2Et
20 R = CH2OH
21 R = CH2Br
i
j
f
g
24 R1 = OH, R2 = H
k
l
25 R1 = I, R2 = H
3 R1
=
+PPh3 I , R2 = H
Scheme 3. (a) TBDPSCl, imidazole, CH2Cl2, 84%. (b) Me2C-
(OMe)2, CSA, 97%. (c) Raney Ni, EtOH, 98%. (d) (COCl)2,
DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, À78 ꢀC–0 ꢀC. (e) triethylphosphono-
Now we have succeeded in the removal of PMB protecting
group, and the yield of the resulting hydroxy ester needs to be
improved. The total synthesis of macrolactin A is underway.
ꢀ
crotonate, LiOH, 4 A MS, THF, reflux, 10 h, 62% in two steps.
(f) DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, À78 ꢀC, 1 h, 92%. (g) NBS, PPh3,
CH2Cl2, À78 ꢀC, 30 min, 95%. (h) 6, n-BuLi, and then 21,
THF, À78 ꢀC; 93%. (i) 6% Na–Hg, Na2HPO4, MeOH, 0 ꢀC,
66%. (j) TBAF, THF, 89%. (k) Ph3P, imidazole, I2, benzene,
0 ꢀC, 92%. (l) Ph3P, CH3CN, reflux, 48 h, 97%.
This work was supported by a grant from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China and a grant from the State
Key Laboratory of Bio-organic and Natural Products Chemistry.
References
1
a) K. Gustafson, M. Roman, and W. Fenical, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 111, 7519 (1989). b) S. D. Rychnovsky, D. J. Skalitzky,
C. Pathirana, P. R. Jensen, and W. Fenical, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
114, 671 (1992).
H. H. Kim, W. G. Kim, I. J. Ryoo, C. J. Kim, J. E. Suk, K. H.
Han, S. Y. Hwang, and I. D. Yoo, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 7,
429 (1997).
OTBS
OTBS
Z:E = 98:2
2
+
P+Ph3I
O
CO2Et
OPMB
NaHMDS
CO2Et
OPMB
2
3
THF, 78°C
O
79%
O
O
´
a) T. J. Benvegnu and R. L. Gree, Tetrahedron, 52, 11821
O
26
3
(1996). b) S. Tanimori, Y. Morita, M. Tsubota, and M.
´
´
Nakayama, Synth. Commun., 26, 559 (1996). c) A. Gonzalez,
Scheme 4.
´
´
J. Aiguade, F. Urpı, and J. Vilarrasa, Tetrahedron Lett., 37,
8949 (1996). d) R. J. Boyce and G. Pattenden, Tetrahedron
Lett., 37, 3501 (1996). e) S. Li and W. A. Donaldson, Synthe-
sis, 2003, 2064, and references were cited therein.
a) S. Li, R. Xu, and D. Bai, Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 3463 (2000).
b) S. Li, R. Xu, X. Xiao, and D. Bai, Chin. J. Chem., 18, 910
(2000).
C24 segment 3.
With the advanced segments 2 and 3 in hand, the coupling of
two segments via Wittig reaction in the presence of NaHDMS
smoothly provided the fully protected sec-precursor 26 in 79%
yield (Scheme 4). The Z:E ratio of the newly formed double
bond is 98:2. In order to test the deprotection of PMB group
and the macrocyclization of the sec-precursor 26, an analogue
of 26, compound 30 was thus designed and synthesized
(Scheme 5). The coupling of segment 2 and phosphonium salt
29, which was synthesized from monoprotected 1,12-dodecane-
diol 27, succussfully provided 30. Deprotection of PMB ether in
30 gave 31 in 70% yield.11 Saponification of ester 31 with LiOH,
followed by the Yamaguchi macrolactonization12 of the result-
ing hydroxy acid in situ gave the protected macrolide, which
was deprotected with TBAF–AcOH, obtaining the macrolide an-
alogues of macrolactin A, 7 and 32 in 28% and 42% yields for
three steps respectively. During the reaction, the Z-double bond
of C2–C3 in 31 was partially converted into E-form.13
4
5
a) A. B. Smith, III and G. R. Ott, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 13095
(1996). b) Y. Kim, R. A. Singer, and E. M. Carreira, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 37, 1261 (1998). c) J. P. Marino, M. S.
McClure, D. P. Holub, J. V. Comasseto, and F. C. Tucci,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 1664 (2002).
K. Ando, J. Org. Chem., 62, 1934 (1997).
M. Bessodes, D. Komiotis, and K. Antonakis, Tetrahedron
Lett., 27, 579 (1986).
T. Katsuki, A. W. M. Lee, P. Ma, V. S. Martin, S. Masamune,
K. B. Sharpless, D. Tuddenham, and F. J. Walker, J. Org.
Chem., 47, 1378 (1982).
J. M. Takacs, M. R. Jaber, F. Clememt, and C. Walters, J. Org.
Chem., 63, 6757 (1998).
6
7
8
9
In summary, a synthesis of a sec-precursor of macrolactin A
was achieved through a highly convergent and efficient route. In
the synthesis, the Wittig reaction and the Horner–Emmons reac-
tion were utilized to construct the three characteristic E,Z- and
E,E-dienes. An ꢀ-alkylation of sulfone stabilized anion with
allyl bromide was used for the synthesis of C11–C24 segment.
The macrolide analogues of macrolactin A were also synthesized
using this strategy.
10 H. A. Bates, J. Farina, and M. Tong, J. Org. Chem., 51, 2637
(1986).
11 Y. Oikawa, T. Yoshioka, and O. Yonemitsu, Tetrahedron Lett.,
23, 885 (1982).
12 J. Inanaga, K. Hirata, H. Saeki, T. Katsuki, and M. Yamaguchi,
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 52, 1989 (1979).
13 Y. Kobayashi, A. Fukuda, T. Kimachi, M. Ju-ichi, and Y.
Takemoto, Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 677 (2004).
Published on the web (Advance View) July 5, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.906