Energy and Electron Transfer in ZnP-nT-C60 Linked Triads
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 109, No. 30, 2005 14373
(4) (a) Davis, W. B.; Ratner, M. A.; Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. Phys.
2002, 281, 333. (b) Miller, S. E.; Lukas, A. S.; Marsh, E.; Bushard, P.;
Wasielewski, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7802. (c) Gosztola, D.;
Wang, B.; Wasielewski, M. R. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1996, 102, 71.
(d) Wasielewski, M. R. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 395.
8T-C60 in o-DCB. The intermolecular BET process takes place
near the diffusion-controlled limit (kdiff ) 5.0 × 109 M-1 s-1
in o-DCB).28
Comparison with H2P-nT-C60. In the case of ZnP-nT-
C60, the final CS states depended on the solvent polarity, while
(5) Verhoeven, J. W.; Scherer, T.; Willemse, R. J. Pure Appl. Chem.
1993, 65, 1717.
the final CS state for H2P-nT-C60 was H2P-nT•+-C60
•-
(6) Guldi, D. M.; Asmus, K. D. J. Am. Chem Soc. 1997, 119, 5744.
(7) Verhoeven, J. W. Pure Appl. Chem. 1990, 62, 1585.
(8) Page, C. C.; Moser, C. C.; Chen, X.; Dutton, P. L. Nature 1999,
independent of the solvent property. In o-DCB, the τRIP values
for ZnP-nT•+-C60•- (450-910 µs) were extremely longer than
those for H2P-nT•+-C60•- (14-27 µs). Considering the relation
402, 47.
(9) (a) Luo, C.; Guldi, D. M.; Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Sakata, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6535. (b) Fukuzumi, S.; Imahori, H.; Yamada,
H.; El-Khouly, M. E.; Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O.; Guldi, D. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 2571. (c) Imahori, H.; Tamaki, K.; Guldi, D. M.; Luo. C.;
Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2607.
(d) Imahori, H.; Guldi, D. M.; Tamaki, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Luo, C.; Sakata,
Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6617. (e) Imahori, H.;
Tamaki, K.; Araki, Y.; Sekiguchi, Y.; Ito, O.; Sakata, Y.; Fukuzumi, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5165.
(10) Lindell, P. A.; Kuciauskas, D.; Sumida, J. P.; Nash, B.; Nguyen,
D.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
1400. (b) Carbonera, D.; Di Valentin, M.; Corvaja, C.; Agostini, G.;
Giacometti, G.; Liddell, P. A.; Kuciauskas, D.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T.
A.; Gust, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4398.
(11) (a) Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1956, 24, 966. (b) Marcus, R. A.
J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 867. (c) Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26,
872. (d) Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 679. (e) Marcus, R. A.;
Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265.
(12) Kroto, H. W.; Heath, J. R.; O’Brien, S, C.; Curl, R. F.; Smalley,
R. E. Nature 1985, 318, 162. (b) Sogoshi, N., Kato, Y.; Wakabayashi, T.;
Momose, T.; Tam, S.; DeRose, M. E.; Fajardo, M. E. J. Phys. Chem. A
2000, 104, 3733.
of the energy levels of the CS states (∆GRIP(ZnP-nT•+-C60
)
•-
) ∆GRIP(ZnP•+-nT-C60•-) and ∆GRIP(H2P-nT•+-C60•-) <
∆GRIP(H2P•+-nT-C60•-)), this difference in the τRIP values is
•-
due to the equilibrium of ZnP-nT•+-C60 and ZnP•+-nT-
C60•-, as described in eq 18.
In anisole, the τRIP values of ZnP-nT•+-C60•- (7.7-9.1 µs)
are almost the same values as those of H2P-nT•+-C60•- (5.3-
4.5 µs), since ∆GRIP(ZnP-nT•+-C60•-) < ∆GRIP(ZnP•+-nT-
C60•-) is the same tendency with the ∆GRIP values for H2P-
•-
nT-C60. The final CR process via ZnP-nT•+-C60 may be
relatively slow because of the Marcus inverted region similar
•- 22a
to that of H2P-nT•+-C60
.
Furthermore, the triplet spin
character of this vicinal radical ion pair may also prolong the
lifetimes.31
In PhCN, on the other hand, the τRIP values of ZnP-nT•+-
C60 (0.63-0.83 µs) were shorter than those of H2P-nT•+-
•-
•-
C60 (1.9-2.4 µs), indicating that the CR process may occur
(13) (a) Haddon, R. C. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 243. (b) Haddon, R.
C. Science 1993, 261, 1545.
via ZnP•+-nT-C60•- with a short lifetime, while the CR process
occurs via H2P-nT•+-C60 with a longer lifetime.
•-
(14) (a) Maggini, M.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 9798. (b) Guldi, D. M.; Prato, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 695.
(15) (a) Allemand, P. H.; Koch, A.; Wudl, F.; Rubin, F.; Y.; Diederich,
F.; Alvarenz, M. M.; Anz, S. J.; Whetten, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 1050. (b) Dubois, D.; Kadish, K. M.; Flanagan, S.; Haufler, R. E.;
Chibante, L. P. F.; Wilson, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4364.
(16) (a) D’Souza, F.; Deviprasad, G. R.; Zandler, M. E.; El-Khouly,
M. E.; Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 4801. (b) D’Souza,
F.; Zandler, M. E.; Smith, P. M.; Deviprasad, G. R.; Arkady, K.; Fujitsuka,
M.; Ito, O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 649. (c) D’Souza, F.; Deviprasad,
G. R.; Zandler, M. E.; El-Khouly, M E.; Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O. J. Phys.
Chem. B. 2002, 106, 4952. (d) Fujitsuka, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Ito, O.;
Yamashiro, T.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2001, 27, 73. (e)
Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O.; Yamashiro, T.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. J. Phys. Chem.
A 2000, 104, 4876. (f) Tkachenko, N. V.; Rantala, L.; Tauber, A. Y.; Helaja,
J.; Hynninen, P. V.; Lemmetyinen, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9378.
(g) Schuster, D. I.; Cheng, P.; Wilson, S. R.; Prokhorenko, V.; Katterle,
M.; Holzwarth, A. R.; Braslavsky, S. E.; Klihm, G.; Williams, R. M.; Luo,
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11599. (h) Guldi, D. M.; Garscia, G. T.;
Mattay, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 9679. (i) Guldi, D. M.; Maggini,
M.; Scorrano, G.; Prato, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 974. (j) Bell, T.
D. M.; Smith, T. A.; Ghiggino, K. P.; Ranasinghe, M. G.; Shephard, M. J.;
Paddon-Row: M. N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 268, 223. (k) Imahori, H.;
Hagiwara, K.; Akiyama, T.; Aoki, M.; Taniguchi, S.; Okada, T.; Shirakawa,
M.; Sakata, Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 263, 545. (l) Williams, R. M.; Zwier,
M. N.; Verhoeven, J. W. J Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4093. (m) Imahori,
H.; Cardoso, S.; Tatman, D.; Lin, S.; Noss, L.; Seely, G. R.; Sereno, L.;
Silber, C.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Gust, D. J. Photochem. Photobiol.,
A 1995, 62, 1009.
(17) (a) Smirnov, S. N.; Liddell, P. A.; Vlassiouk, I. V.; Teslja, A.;
Kuciauskas, D.; Braun, C. L.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J.
Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7567. (b) Kodis, G.; Liddell, P. A.; de la Garza,
L.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 2100.
(c) Carbonera, D.; Di Valentin, M.; Corvaja, C. Agostini, G.; Giacometti,
G.; Liddell, P. A.; Kuciauskas, D.; Moore, A. L.; Moore, T. A.; Gust, D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4398. (d) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A.
L.; Macpherson, A. N.; Lopez, A.; DeGraziano, J. M.; Gouni, I.; Bitters-
mann, E.; Seely, G. R.; Gao, F.; Nieman, R. A.; Ma, X. C.; Demanche, L.;
Luttrull, D. K.; Lee, S.-J.; Kerrigan, P. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
11141. (e) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L.; Lee, S.-J.; Bittersmann,
E.; Luttrull, D. K.; Rehms, A. A.; De Graziano, J. M.; Ma, X. C.; Gao, F.;
Belford, R. E.; Trier, T. T. Science 1990, 248, 199.
Conclusion
The charge separation of ZnP-nT-C60 by excitation of the
1ZnP* moiety gave two CS sates; one is ZnP•+-nT-C60
•-
1
generated by the direct CS process via ZnP* with a wirelike
performance of the nT moiety, and the other is CS ZnP-nT•+-
•-
1
C60 generated by the indirect CS process via C60* after the
EN process from ZnP* to C60. ZnP-nT•+-C60 was also
generated by the HS process from ZnP•+-nT-C60•-. The
electron-transfer processes were successfully controlled by the
solvent polarity. In the case of o-DCB, the τRIP values were
estimated to be extremely long compared with those in the other
solvents and H2P-nT•+-C60•- in o-DCB. These long τRIP values
1
•-
•-
may be caused by the equilibrium between ZnP-nT•+-C60
and ZnP•+-nT-C60•- with similar energies in o-DCB. The roles
of the nT moieties vary much with the length, electronic factors,
and medium effects.
Acknowledgment. The present work was partly supported
by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Area (417)
from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of
Japan.
Supporting Information Available: Optimized structures
and the HOMO and LUMO. Tables for free-energy changes
for charge separation and charge recombination. Table for rate
constants and quantum yields. Calculation of energy-transfer
rate constants. Charge-recombination data of H2P-nT-C60 in
anisole. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References and Notes
(18) Ramos, A. M.; Meskers, S. C. J.; van Hal, P. A.; Knol, J.;
Hummelen, J. C.; Janssen, R. A. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 9269.
(19) Sanchez, L.; Perez, I.; Martin, N.; Guldi, D. M. Chem.sEur. J.
2003, 9, 2457.
(1) Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Chem. ReV. 1992, 92, 369.
(2) Langen, R.; Chang, I. J.; Germanas, J. P.; Richards, J. H.; Winkler,
J. R.; Gray, H. B. Science 1995, 268, 1733.
(3) (a) Imahori, H.; Sakata, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2445. (b)
Imahori, H.; Sakata Y. AdV. Mater. 1997, 9, 537.
(20) D’Souza, F.; Zandler, M. E.; Smith, P. M.; Deviprasad, G. R.;
Arkady, K. Fujitsuka, M.; Ito, O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 649.