Beinhoff et al.
smaller dendrimers can be expected to form more open
structures in contrast to larger molecules that should
have more spherical shapes with a denser packing. As a
consequence, site isolation by encapsulation, for example,
strongly depends on the solvent properties.7 Structural
and solvent effects can also be expected to have a strong
influence on the efficiency of excimer-like interactions as
well as energy and electron transfer, processes that
strongly rely on the relative positions and energies of the
photoexcited states of the involved chromophores and
redox-active groups, respectively.8
of dendrimers. However, the possible variation of the
solvent density inside a dendrimer that could strongly
affect the microenvironment and especially the local
polarity at each site has not received much attention. If
the density of a dendrimer gradually decreases from its
interior to its exterior as, e.g., SANS measurements6,14
and computational studies6,15 indicate, the local polarity
created by generation-specific penetration of polar solvent
molecules would be expected to increase in the same
direction resulting in a polarity gradient, especially for
spherical dendrimers with a high degree of symmetry. A
similar polarity gradient has been supposed to have an
effect on the charge-transfer efficiency of photoexcited
polyelectrolyte multilayer systems.16 Such an effect could
be applied for dendritic systems that are equipped with
electron acceptors at defined generations to realize a
stepwise electron transfer through the dendritic frame-
work. A different stabilization of the formed radical
anions17 after charge separation due to different degrees
of solvation in each generation could provide the free-
energy gradient as the necessary driving force.
In our concept, we will apply fluorescent polarity
probes to study the possible polarity gradient in dendritic
structures with the probes incorporated at specific gen-
erations.18 Because of the bulkiness of such probes in
comparison to the dendrimer skeleton, the concept in-
volves so-called volume dummies. They will be attached
to those generations that do not carry the probes in order
to maintain the same sterical and solvation situation in
comparable generations of a set of dendrimers, Figure
1a.
In this project, the cyano-substituted phenyl pyrene
derivative 1 (Figure 1b) will be applied as fluorescence
probe. 1 was found to be a suitable probe due to its strong
solvatochromic effect and sufficient fluorescence quantum
yield.19 For mixtures of 1 and 2, it was already
shown that 1 fulfills the requirement to be exclusively
photoexcitable in the presence of the volume dummy
2.19
The tuning of the properties of dendrimers is commonly
achieved by derivatization of the peripheral end groups
or the core moiety. Contrary to this approach, the
internal functionalization of the volume between is
pursued with less activity.20 Especially the site-specific
incorporation of functional groups by premodified branch-
ing units seems to be a valuable goal, since there are only
a handful of examples known at present.21
The attachment of functional probes has facilitated the
detailed investigation of these properties.
A generation-dependent accessibility was shown for
dendrons by incorporating anthracene as a single fluo-
rescent probe unit in a specific location and studying the
accessibility of these locations using an intermolecular
photoinduced electron-transfer-based fluorescence quench-
ing process.9 Especially pyrene has been applied as a
probe due to its well-known fluorescence characteristics.
The relative structural permeabilities of a single pyrenyl
residue attached to an amine within a series of symmetric
poly(amido) dendrimers was investigated by quenching
experiments. The increasing blocking of a pyrenyl residue
with the growing dendrimer network could be shown.10
Pyrene photoactive cores were used as probes to inves-
tigate the isolation of the core functionality by fluores-
cence quenching, energy transfer, and solvatochromic
methods. With increasing chain length as well as solvent
polarity enhanced site isolation was found.5 Pyrene
moieties in poly(propylene imine) dendrimers were used
to probe the extent of steric crowding. More excimer
emission was observed for higher generations with little
evidence of interdendrimer interactions.11 Pyrenes were
also used for studies of the energy transfer in dendrimers.
Energy transfer from pyrene units at the periphery to a
diphenylanthracene core was observed for dendrons in
solution and particles of dendrimer aggregates.12 Excimer
emission was also observed as the predominant fluores-
cence in a series of pyrene-capped dendrons that can be
effectively quenched when a suitable donor group is
attached at the focal point. These results indicate sub-
stantial electronic coupling between the appended chro-
mophores and a suitable donor as the core unit.13
A more detailed knowledge of generation-specific sol-
vent effects should contribute to the basic understanding
(6) Ballauff, M.; Likos, C. N. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 3060-3082;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2998-3020.
(14) (a) Poetschke, D.; Ballauff, M.; Lindner, P.; Fischer, M.; Voegtle,
F. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 4079-4087. (b) Poetschke, D.; Ballauff,
M.; Lindner, P.; Fischer, M.; Voegtle, F. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2000,
201, 330-339. (c) Ballauff, M. Top. Curr. Chem. 2001, 212, 176-194.
(15) (a) Mansfield, M. L.; Klushin, L. I. Macromolecules 1993, 26,
4262-4268. (b) Boris, D.; Rubinstein, M. Macromolecules 1996, 29,
7251-7260. (c) Murat, M.; Grest, G. S. Macromolecules 1996, 29, 1278-
1285. (d) Wallace, E. J.; Buzza, D. M. A.; Read, D. J. Macromolecules
2001, 34, 7140-7146. (e) Maiti, P. K.; Cagin, T.; Wang, G.; Goddard,
W. A., III. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 6236-6254.
(7) Chasse, T. L.; Sachdeva, R.; Li, Q.; Li, Z.; Petrie, R. J.; Gorman,
C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8250-8254.
(8) (a) Hofkens, J.; Zatterini, L.; De Belder, G.; Gensch, T.; Maus,
M.; Vosch, T.; Karni, Y.; Schweitzer, G.; De Schryver, F. C.; Hermann,
A.; Muellen, K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 304, 1-9. (b) Gorman, C. B.;
Smith, J. C.; Hager, M. W.; Parkhurst, B. L.; Gracz, H. S.; Haney, C.
A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9958-9966. (c) Thomas, K. R. J.;
Thompson, A. L.; Sivakumar, A. V.; Bardeen, C. J.; Thayumanavan,
S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 373-383.
(9) Sivanadan, K.; Aathimanikandan, S. V.; Arges, C. G.; Bardeen,
C. J.; Thayumanavan, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2020-2021.
(10) Cardona, C. M.; Wilkes, T.; Ong, W.; Kaifer, A. E.; McCarley,
T. D.; Pandey, S.; Baker, G. A.; Kane, M. N.; Baker, S. N.; Bright, F.
V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 8649-8656.
(16) Tedeschi, C.; Li, L.; Moehwald, H.; Spitz, C.; von Seggern, D.;
Menzel, R.; Kirstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3218-3227.
(17) Reichardt, C. Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry,
2nd ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1988.
(18) Beinhoff, M.; Modrakowski, C.; Weigel, W.; Rettig, W.; Schluet-
er, A. D. Am. Chem. Soc., Polym. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2001, 84, 751-752.
(19) Beinhoff, M.; Weigel, W.; Jurczok, M.; Rettig, W.; Bruedgam,
I.; Hartl, H.; Modrakowski, C.; Schlueter, A. D. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 3819-3829.
(20) Hecht, S. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2003, 41, 1047-
1058.
(11) Baker, L.-A.; Crooks, R. M. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 9034-
9039.
(12) Kobayashi, M.; Machida, S.; Takahashi, S.; Horie, K.; Yoshika-
wa, H.; Masuhara, H. Chem. Lett. 2002, 394-395.
(13) Stewart, G. N.; Fox, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4354-
4360.
6584 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 17, 2005