C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
then easily cleaved by acidic hydrolysis in one step to afford
optically pure (3R,4S)-statine (4) in high yield. To our knowledge,
this approach represents one of the most convenient and direct
syntheses of 3 and 4 reported to date.17
In summary, we have developed a highly efficient and practical
approach for the synthesis of enantiomerically pure â-amino
alcohols by the SmI2-mediated reductive cross-coupling of chiral
N-tert-butanesulfinyl imines with aldehydes. This method is found
to be very effective for the preparation of a broad range of chiral
â-amino alcohols, including functionalized ones under mild condi-
tions. Diastereoselectivities and enantioselectivities in these reac-
tions are excellent in most cases. Moreover, it provides a solution
to a long-standing difficulty in direct construction of enantiopure
â-amino alcohols via the pinacol-type cross-coupling between
carbonyls and imines. We believe that both this methodology and
the obtained â-amino alcohols will find wide use in asymmetric
synthesis. The application in natural product synthesis is currently
in progress.
product (entries 8 and 9). As previously reported,11 these two
substrates are subject to easy homocoupling under the similar
reaction conditions. Fortunately, the absolute structure of the
obtained cross pinacol product was unambiguously established by
X-ray crystallography, and the stereochemistry of the two newly
formed carbon centers was revealed to possess R,S-configuration.12
When the R1 or R2 substituent became more bulky, the coupling
reaction still proceeded well (entries 2, 3, 12, and 13). In the reaction
with isobutyraldehyde, different substituted aromatic imines gave
similar selectivities (entries 1 and 6-13), suggesting that the
diastereoselectivity was primarily controlled by the stereochemistry
of the N-sulfinyl group rather than by the electronic effect. However,
the diastereoselectivity was found to be influenced by the steric
hindrance of the aldehyde substrate (entries 1-5). Less hindered
aldehydes, such as hexanal and 3-phenylpropanal, resulted in a
decrease in diastereoselectivity (91:9 and 88:12) (entries 4 and 5).
Besides the aromatic N-sulfinyl imines, we also evaluated the cross-
coupling of aliphatic imines with isobutyraldehyde and found that
the reactions could equally be accomplished in high yields and high
diastereomeric ratios (entries 14-17). Thus, the reaction substrate
scope is largely expanded, indicating the great compatibility and
efficiency of the method. Notably, for those â-amino alcohol
products 2h-2k, the para-halogen, acetoxy, or methoxy substituent
on the benzene ring would be a useful functionality for further
modification, such as adjustment of the solubility or attachment
onto support materials via O-alkylation or coupling reactions.13 For
product 2q, it is also worth noting that removal of the N-sulfinyl
and benzyl groups will afford the chiral 2-amino-1,3-propanediol
derivative, which is a synthetically very useful building block.
Cleavage of the sulfinyl group under acidic conditions (HCl/
MeOH) was subsequently accomplished to afford â-amino alcohols
in high yields. Very gratifyingly, excellent enantiomeric excesses
(>95%) were observed in all cases (Table 1). These results clearly
indicate that the N-sulfinyl serves as a powerful chiral directing
group and predominates the stereoselectivity of the reaction.
As described above, this highly diastereo- and enantioselective
crossed pinacol coupling method offers a significantly more efficient
and direct construction of â-amino alcohol scaffolds. To further
demonstrate the synthetic value, the rapid preparation of two
biologically active compounds D-erythro-sphinganine (3) and
(3R,4S)-statine (4) was then carried out (Scheme 2).
Acknowledgment. Financial support from the NSFC (20402018,
203900506), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (05QMX1467), the
Major State Basic Research Development Program (G2000077506),
and the Chinese Academy of Sciences is acknowledged.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization data, including X-ray data of 2i. This material is
References
(1) Lee, H.-S.; Kang, S. H. Synlett 2004, 1673.
(2) For reviews, see: (a) Ager, D. J.; Prakash, I.; Schaad, D. R. Chem. ReV.
1996, 96, 835. (b) Pu, L.; Yu, H.-B. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 757.
(3) For reviews on the synthesis of â-amino alcohols, see: (a) Bergmeier, S.
C. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 2561. (b) Reetz, M. T. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99,
1121. For selected recent examples, see: (c) Trost, B. M.; Terrell, L. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 338. (d) List, B.; Pojarliev, P.; Biller, W.
T.; Martin, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 827. (e) Matsunaga, S.;
Yoshida, T.; Morimoto, H.; Kumagai, N.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 8777.
(4) (a) Roskamp, E. J.; Pedersen, S. F.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 6551.
(b) Shono, T.; Kise, N.; Kunimi, N.; Nomura, R. Chem. Lett. 1991, 2191.
(c) Shono, T.; Kise, N.; Fujimoto, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 525.
(d) Hanamoto, T.; Inanaga, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 3555. (e)
Guijarro, D.; Yus, M. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 7761. (f) Shono, T.; Kise,
N.; Fujimoto, T.; Yamanami, A.; Nomura, R. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
1730. (g) Machrouchi, F.; Namy, J. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1315.
(h) Shimizu, M.; Iwata, A.; Makino, H. Synlett 2002, 1538. (i) Masson,
G.; Py, S.; Valle´e, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1772. For an
example using chiral imine derived from (R)-phenylglycinol methyl ether
to give moderate dr and ee, see: (j) Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4469.
(5) (a) Taniguchi, N.; Uemura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 8301. (b)
Tanaka, Y.; Taniguchi, N.; Uemura, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 835. (c) Tanaka,
Y.; Taniguchi, N.; Kimura, T.; Uemura, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9227.
(d) Chavarot, M.; Rivard, M.; Rose-Munch, F.; Rose, E.; Py, S. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 2330.
(6) For recent reviews on the chemistry of sulfinimines, see: (a) Ellman, J.
A.; Owens, T. D.; Tang, T. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 984. (b) Zhou,
P.; Chen, B.-C.; Davis, F. A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8003.
(7) Zhong, Y.-W.; Xu, M.-H.; Lin, G.-Q. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3953.
(8) Namy, J. L.; Souppe, J.; Kagan, H. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 765.
(9) Detected by HPLC-MS and 1H NMR analysis of the crude material.
t
(10) Only 47% of the yield was achieved in the absence of BuOH.
(11) Zhong, Y.-W.; Isumi, K.; Xu, M.-H.; Lin, G.-Q. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4747.
(12) For X-ray structure and related data, see Supporting Information.
(13) For an example, see: Edwards, C. W.; Haddleton, D. M.; Morsley, D.;
Shipton, M. R.; Wills, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 5823.
(14) A larger excess was used for its poor solubility in THF at -78 °C.
(15) Yield based on recovered starting material.
(16) Sato, M. Synthesis 1985, 672.
The cross-coupling of palmitaldehyde 5 (4 equiv)14 with imine
1q was performed at -78 °C under standard conditions to provide
6 as a single diastereomer in 64% yield.15 Removal of the benzyl
and sulfinyl groups gave D-erythro-sphinganine (3) in 90% overall
yield with 97% ee. When aldehyde 716 (2 equiv) was treated with
N-sulfinyl imine 1r under similar reaction conditions, 8 was isolated
in 58% yield with 99% de. The tert-butyl ester and N-sulfinyl were
(17) For selected recent approaches to D-erythro-sphinganine, see: (a) So, R.
C.; Ndonye, R.; Izmirian, D. P.; Richardson, S. K.; Guerrera, R. L.;
Howell, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3233. (b) Yun, J. M.; Sim, T. B.;
Hahm, H. S.; Lee, W. K.; Ha, H.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7675. For
(3R,4S)-statine and its stereoisomers, see: (c) Pesenti, C.; Bravo, P.;
Corradi, E.; Frigerio, M.; Meille, S. V.; Panzeri, W.; Viani, F.; Zanda,
M. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5637. (d) Andre´s, J. M.; Pedrosa, R.; Pe´rez,
A.; Pe´rez-Encabo, A. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 8521.
JA054401W
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 34, 2005 11957