A. D. Brown et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 1280–1283
1283
apical to basal flux rate through a monolayer of CaCo-2
cells. This assay suggested that not only did 7 possess
intrinsically poor cell permeability but it was also highly
effluxed by transporter proteins. This in vitro data com-
bined with the low microsomal stability demonstrated
that 7 should have low oral bioavailability due to poor
absorption through the gut wall and high first pass
metabolism. Analogue 7 was progressed into rat
in vivo studies and following intra venous administration
the volume of distribution was high (Vd = 14 L/kg),
however, with a clearance of greater than liver blood
flow (103 ml/min/kg) the measured half life was 1.6 h.
An oral cross over was conducted and confirmed that
in rat the oral bioavailability was <5%. This pharmaco-
kinetic profile added to the confidence that any swal-
lowed fraction of the inhaled dose in man would not
contribute to the systemic exposure of 7. Compound 7
was also screened for off target pharmacology and
showed no significant affinity (<100 nM) for other
receptors, enzymes or ion channels.
ery of high quality material for subsequent clinical
studies.
In conclusion, we have described our efforts to deliver
a b2-adrenoreceptor agonist that has a longer duration
of action in pre-clinical models than salmeterol. Addi-
tionally a key design feature was to ensure that com-
pounds would have low oral bioavailability compared
to salmeterol to reduce systemic effects through the
swallowed fraction after inhalation. This was achieved
through introducing amide functionality with high
hydrogen bonding potential to limit absorption while
also ensuring high first pass metabolism by the liver.
Furthermore, through collaboration with experts in
large scale chemistry 10 was designed with the goal
of delivering an optimised synthetic route at time of
nomination to expedite delivery of bulk material for
clinical trials.
Acknowledgments
Attention now turned to reordering the synthetic route
to maximise the number of crystalline intermediates
and minimise synthetic complexity. Within the early dis-
covery phase of the project the amide coupling was per-
formed as the final step to allow rapid variation of the
amine expression. However, there were no crystalline
intermediates in the route which presented difficulties
in purification when scaling up the final optimised com-
pound. It was decided that with such a chemically ro-
bust adamantyl expression the amide coupling could
be performed earlier in the route. This had the advan-
tage that the new intermediate 10 required was highly
crystalline and precipitated from the reaction solvents
as the hydrochloride salt and could be isolated by filtra-
tion. Amide coupling of 1-adamantylamine and cleavage
of the benzylamine chiral auxiliary generated 12 which
could again be purified by recrystallisation. The synthe-
sis was completed with installation of the saligenin
expression, hydrogenation and cleavage of the benzyl
protecting group and finally removal of the silicon pro-
tecting group. This could be achieved using L-tartaric
acid which performed the protodesilylation and salt for-
mation to give crystalline, high purity final material.
This focus on route optimisation, collaboration with
large scale chemistry experts and selection of a clinical
candidate using synthetic expedience as a key criterion
was a highly successful approach to ensure a rapid deliv-
The authors recognise Michele Coghlan, Susan Sum-
merhill and Karen Wright, for their expertise in generat-
ing and analysing the biological data.
References and notes
1. Waldeck, B. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 445, 1.
2. Siafakas, N. M.; Vermeire, P.; Price, N. B. Eur. Respir. J.
1995, 8, 1398.
3. Johnson, M. Med. Res. Rev. 1995, 153, 225.
4. Anderson, G. P. Life Sci. 1993, 52, 2145.
5. Palmqvist, M.; Persson, G.; Lazer, L.; Rosenborg, J.;
Larsson, P.; Lotvall, J. Eur. Respir. J. 1997, 10, 2484.
6. Brown, A. D.; Bunnage, M. E.; Glossop, P. A.; James, K.;
Jones, R.; Lane, C. A. L.; Lewthwaite, R. A.; Mantell, S.;
Perros-Huguet, C.; Price, D. A.; Trevethick, M.; Webster,
R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4012.
7. Bennett, J. A.; Harrison, T. W.; Tattersfield, A. E. Eur.
Respir. J. 1999, 13, 445.
8. Artursson, P.; Palm, K.; Luthman, K. Adv. Drug Delivery
Rev. 1996, 12, 67.
9. Nials, A. T.; Sumner, M. J.; Johnson, M.; Coleman, R. A.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 108, 507.
10. Austin, R. P.; Barton, P.; Bonnert, R. V.; Brown, R. C.;
Cage, P. A.; Cheshire, D. R.; Davis, A. M.; Dougall, I. G.;
Ince, F.; Pairaudeau, G.; Young, A. J. Med. Chem. 2003,
46, 3210.