J. Igarashi, Y. Kobayashi / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 6381–6384
6383
conversion of 11 to 12 and with 3% HCl in MeOH at
room temperature used for deprotection of the TBDPS
(SiPh2Bu-t) of 13.
easy isolation of the corresponding amines 23–25 by
chromatography.
In summary, the synthesis of quinine (1) and quinidine
(2) was accomplished with the N-Teoc group in shorter
steps and higher overall yield than those recorded in the
original synthesis: with the Teoc group, nine steps from
N-Bn piperidine 4, 22.1% and 18.2% yields for 1 and 2,
respectively; with the original groups, 12 steps from 4,
17.2% and 12.8% yields. Moreover, the last two reac-
tions (deprotection and cyclization) proceeded in a dom-
ino fashion quite cleanly and efficiently with CsF.
Deprotection of the Teoc group in 6b was first carried
out according to the literature procedure7b with Bu4NF
(3 equiv) in refluxing THF. The deprotection proceeded
quite successfully as expected. However, piperidine 16
thus formed was contaminated with the chromatograph-
ically inseparable amine(s) probably attributed to
amine(s) derived from Bu4NF and/or an impurity in-
volved in the commercial bottle.9 The amine impurity
was not separated even after its conversion to quinine
(1).
Acknowledgements
Inorganic salts such as KF and CsF were next examined
as a reagent for deprotection of the Teoc group using a
model compound 10. Reaction with KF (10 equiv) in
refluxing MeCN and that in refluxing DMF proceeded
marginally in both runs, and 10 was recovered un-
changed. On the other hand, deprotection with CsF
(5 equiv) in refluxing MeCN (bp 81 °C) was observed
to a slight extent. Attempts to speed up the deprotection
in other solvents such as EtCN (bp 97 °C), MeCN/DMF
(9:1), and MeCN/DMI (9:1) under reflux were unsuc-
cessful. In contrast, complete deprotection was realized
with CsF (5 equiv) in DMF at 90 °C.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scien-
tific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science,
Sports, and Culture, Japan.
References and notes
1. Igarashi, J.; Katsukawa, M.; Wang, Y.-G.; Acharya, H.
P.; Kobayashi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3783–3786.
2. StorkÕs approach to quinine seems inapplicable to that of
quinidine, and JacobsenÕs synthesis of the quinine alka-
loids suffer from low stereoselectivity in the preparation of
the piperidine ring: (a) Stork, G.; Niu, D.; Fujimoto, R.
A.; Koft, E. R.; Balkovec, J. M.; Tata, J. R.; Dake, G. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3239–3242; (b) Raheem, I.
T.; Goodman, S. N.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 706–707.
Keeping in mind the above conditions for deprotection
of the N-Teoc group and the conditions for the subse-
quent quinuclidine ring formation by the intramolecular
attack of the nitrogen to the epoxy carbon, reaction of
6b with CsF was conducted in DMF/t-BuOH (9:1) at
110 °C for 12 h. The domino reaction proceeded cleanly,
and quinine (1) was obtained in 78% yield from 6b after
chromatography on silica gel.
3. (a) Cooley, J. H.; Evain, E. J. Synthesis 1989, 1–7; (b)
Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Wiley
& Sons: New
York, 1999; (c) Bhat, R. G.; Ghosh, Y.; Chandrasekaran,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7983–7985.
4. (a) Sieber, P. Helv. Chim. Acta 1977, 60, 2711–2716; (b)
Carpino, L. A.; Tsao, J.-H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1978, 358–359; (c) Carpino, L. A.; Sau, A. C.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 514–515; (d) Meyers,
A. I.; Babiak, K. A.; Campbell, A. L.; Comins, D. L.;
Fleming, M. P.; Henning, R.; Heuschmann, M.; Hudsp-
eth, J. P.; Kane, J. M.; Reider, P. J.; Roland, D. M.;
Shimizu, K.; Tomioka, K.; Walkup, R. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1983, 105, 5015–5024; (e) Forsch, R. A.; Rosowsky,
A. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 1305–1309; (f) Kim, G.; Chu-
Moyer, M. Y.; Danishefsky, S. J.; Shulte, G. K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 30–39.
Similarly, diastereomeric epoxide 7b furnished quinidine
(2) in 75% yield upon exposure to CsF under the above
reaction conditions (Scheme 3).
Finally, generality of the new protocols for the trans-
protection with 8 synthesized in situ and for the CsF-
promoted deprotection of the N-Teoc group was briefly
studied. As is summarized in Scheme 4, trans-protec-
tion of N-Bn amines 17–19 in toluene at room temper-
ature proceeded in high yields and deprotection of
the N-Teoc amines 20–22 with CsF was cleanly
accomplished in DMF at 90 °C for 1 h, thus allowing
5. (a) Reagents/conditions used for deprotection of N-CO2R
groups
(CO2CH2CCl3
with
Zn
in
AcOH,5a
CO2CH(Cl)CH3 in MeOH,5b–d and CO2CH@CH2 with
Br2 or NBS5e) seemed incompatible with our strategy for
synthesis of the quinine alkaloids due to hard conditions,
instability of the protective group as such, and/or incon-
venience of the reagent Montzka, T. A.; Matiskella, J. D.;
Partyka, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 1325–1327; (b)
Olofson, R. A.; Martz, J. T.; Senet, J.-P.; Piteau, M.;
Malfroot, T. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 2081–2082; (c)
Ph
N
N
R
R
17, R = Bn
18, R = Bn
21, R = Teoc
24, R = H
85%
90%
78%
89%
20, R = Teoc
23, R = H
´
Gubert, S.; Braojos, C.; Sacristan, A.; Ortiz, J. A.
Synthesis 1991, 318–320; (d) Yang, B. V.; OÕRourke, D.;
Li, J. Synlett 1993, 195–196; (e) Olofson, R. A.; Schnur, R.
C.; Bunes, L.; Pepe, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 1567–
1570.
Ph
19, R1 = TBS, R2 = Bn
22, R1 = TBS, R2 = Teoc
25, R1 = R2 = H
73%
99%
R1O
N
R2
6. The Cbz group used in JacobsenÕs synthesis is removed by
Scheme 4.
using Et2AlCl/thioanisole.2b