C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
The fluorescence change for the duplex 3/3′ was quite different.
The change in ln(Φ′(ICT)/Φ(LE)) behaved like that of the single
strand state at temperatures higher than the duplex Tm (41 °C). The
ln(Φ′(ICT)/Φ(LE)) value dropped steeply at approximately 45 °C,
and then, interestingly, linearly decreased with decreasing temper-
ature. These behaviors occurring by hybridization suggest that the
fluorescence emission was under low-temperature limits, where kd
is negligibly small compared with 1/τ′.11a The activation energy
0
for the forward ICT reaction, Ea, which was calculated from the
slope of the line, was estimated to be 9.9 kJ mol-1. For phenyl-
substituted pyrene derivatives, it is known that the viscosity effect
of solvents strongly affects the time-determining step of twisted
ICT (TICT) formation because of the irreversibility of TICT
formation at low temperature.12 In the present case, as a barrier to
the internal rotation of the fluorophore, a narrow free space in the
duplex structure acted instead of viscous solvents. The relaxation
of the fluorophore toward TICT would be difficult in the minor
groove of the duplex.
In conclusion, we have developed a conceptually new nucleoside
modified by the fluorophore with dual fluorescence. The dual
fluorescence was effectively controlled at ambient temperature by
incorporation of the fluorophore into a duplex. The TICT formation
of the fluorophore in the duplex 3/3′ was restricted by the
microstructure near the fluorophore. Our nucleoside with dual
fluorescence serves as a probe for monitoring hybridization with
DNA or RNA by the color change without multilabeling with
fluorescent dyes.
Figure 3. Stevens-Ban plot of the ICT-to-LE fluorescence intensity ratio
of 2, single strand 3, and duplex 3/3′ in 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0)
and 0.1 M sodium chloride. The temperature was changed from 5 to 75
°C; (a) 7.3 µM 2. The line through the data points (its slope equals -∆H/R
under the high-temperature limit condition) corresponds to a stabilization
enthalpy ∆H of -50.1 kJ mol-1; (b) 25 µM 3 (red squares) and 25 µM
3/3′ (blue triangles). Because the slope of the blue straight line is -Ea/R at
the low-temperature limit, the activation energy, Ea, was calculated to be
9.9 kJ mol-1
.
of two colors of orange ICT and blue LE fluorescence (Figure 2b).
The change in the fluorescence color vividly expresses the structural
change in the microenvironment around the fluorophore by
hybridization with the complementary strand. It has previously been
reported that the increase in the LE versus the ICT states is
connected with a conformational relaxation that can be frozen out
by lowering the temperature. Our observation is very similar to
this phenomenon. In our case, it is likely that the dual fluorescence
of the fluorophore was strongly controlled by the duplex formation.
The conformational restriction of the fluorophore in DNA induces
the LE fluorescence band.
To obtain information on an excited-state equilibrium between
LE and ICT states, we examined the temperature dependence of
the fluorescence intensities of 2 and 3 from 5 to 75 °C. The intensity
of the LE fluorescence of 2 increased with increasing temperature,
whereas the ICT fluorescence intensity gradually decreased. The
relation between reaction rate constants and fluorescence quantum
yields is as follows:9
Supporting Information Available: Detailed experimental data
on the synthesis and photochemical assays of the related DNA samples
(in PDF format). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) Lippert, E.; Lu¨der, W.; Boss, H. In AdVances in Molecular Spectroscopy;
Marngini, A., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1962; p 443.
(2) (a) Dobkowski, J.; Waluk, J. Pol. J. Chem. 1993, 67, 1389-1396. (b)
Wiessner, A.; Hu¨ttmann, G.; Ku¨hnle, W.; Staeck, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
99, 14923-14930. (c) Weigel, W.; Rettig, W.; Dekhtyar, M.; Modra-
kowski, C.; Beinhoff, M.; Schlu¨ter, A. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107,
5941-5947.
(3) (a) Rettig, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 971-988. (b)
Grabowski, Z. R.; Rotkiewicz, K.; Rettig, W. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103,
3899-4031.
Φ′(ICT)/Φ(LE) ) (k′/kf) × {ka/(kd + 1/τ′)}
(1)
f
0
The Stevens-Ban plot, the plots of the natural logarithm of the
ICT/LE fluorescence quantum yield ratio versus the reciprocal
absolute temperature,10 for 2 is shown in Figure 3a. Φ′(ICT)/Φ-
(LE) increased upon lowering the temperature and did not deviate
from linear dependence above 20 °C. This means that the high-
(4) (a) Wandelt, B.; Turkewitsch, P.; Stranix, B. R.; Darling, G. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 4199-4205. (b) Changenet, P.; Plaza, P.;
Martin, M. M.; Meyer, Y. H. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 8186-8194.
(c) Techert, S.; Wiessner, A.; Schmatz, S.; Staeck, H. J. Phys. Chem. B
2001, 105, 7579-7587.
(5) See Supporting Information.
temperature limit holds for 2, suggesting that 1/τ′ is negligible
0
(6) (a) Il’ichev, Y.; Ku¨hnle, W.; Zachariasse, K. A. Chem. Phys. 1996, 211,
441-453. (b) Mothilal, K. K.; Inbaraj, J. J.; Gandhidasan, R.; Murugesan,
R. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 162, 9-16.
compared with kd, and a fast equilibrium exists between LE and
ICT states after the excitation of 2.11 A value for the stabilization
enthalpy, ∆H, which was obtained from the slope of this plot, was
(7) These mismatched duplexes also showed dual fluorescence.
(8) (a) Okamoto, A.; Kanatani, K.; Saito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
4820-4827. (b) Okamoto, A.; Kanatani, K.; Saito, Y.; Saito, I. Photomed.
Photobiol. 2004, 26, 77-78.
calculated as -50.1 kJ mol-1
.
The Stevens-Ban plots for the single-stranded DNA 3 and the
duplex 3/3′ are shown in Figure 3b. The fluorescence behavior of
3 in the range of higher temperature (>40 °C) was similar to that
of the nucleoside 2. On the other hand, at lower temperatures, the
data points tended to deviate from linearity. This indicates that the
(9) The ka and kd are the rate constants of the forward and reverse ICT reaction;
τ0′ is the fluorescence lifetime of ICT fluorescence, and kf(LE) and
kf′(ICT) are radiative rate constants.
(10) Stevens, B.; Ban, M. I. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1964, 60, 1515-1523.
(11) (a) Leinhos, U.; Ku¨hnle, W.; Zachariasse, K. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 2013-2021. (b) Druzhinin, S.; Demeter, A.; Niebuer, M.; Tauer, E.;
Zachariasse, K. A. Res. Chem. Intermed. 1999, 25, 531-550.
(12) (a) Lippert, E.; Rettig, W.; Bonacic-Koutecky, V.; Heisel, F.; Miehe´, J.
A. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1987, 68, 1-173. (b) Valeur, B. Molecular
Fluorescence; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
reciprocal ICT state lifetime 1/τ′ of 3 is no longer negligible with
0
respect to kd. It is likely that 3 partially forms a random-coiled
structure, where the ICT formation is unfavorable at low temper-
ature.
JA053609E
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 38, 2005 13129