C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
Acknowledgment. Financial support from NSERC and the
University of Alberta is gratefully acknowledged. R.M. is affiliated
with the Department of Chemistry X-ray Crystallography Labora-
tory.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
complete characterization data for all new compounds; details of the
X-ray crystallography for complexes 12-14 and 18. This material is
References
(1) See, for example: (a) Salzer, A.; Werner, H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1975,
87, 101-108. (b) Bennett, M. A.; Matheson, T. W. J. Organomet. Chem.
1978, 153, C25-27. (c) Salzer, A.; Bigler, P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1981,
48, 199-203. (d) Williams, G. M.; Fisher, R. A.; Heyn, R. H. Organo-
metallics 1986, 5, 818-819. (e) Chen, W.; Sheridan, J. B.; Cote, M. L.;
Lalancette, R. A. Organometallics 1996, 15, 2700-2706 and references
therein.
Scheme 3
(2) Nonconjugated pentahapticity (invariably as η2,η3-coordination) occurs
more commonly in larger rings with greater coordination strain and/or
conformational barriers: (a) Lewis, J.; Parkins, A. W. J. Chem. Soc. (A)
1969, 953-957. (b) Bennett, M. A.; Matheson, T. W.; Robertson, G. B.;
Smith, A. K.; Tucker, P. A. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 2353-2365. (c) Itoh,
K.; Nagashima, H.; Ohshima, T.; Oshima, N.; Nishiyama, H. J. Orga-
nomet. Chem. 1984, 272, 179-188 and references therein.
(3) An early claim2a that protonation of (C5H5)Co(η4-cycloheptatriene)
provides (C5H5)Co(η2,η3-cycloheptadienyl)+ is not supported by spectro-
scopic data and remains unsubstantiated. The isolated product of this
reaction was subsequently identified as the expected η5-cycloheptadienyl
complex.1c
(4) (a) Schwiebert, K. E.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8275-
8276. (b) Etkin, N.; Dzwiniel, T. L.; Schwiebert, K. E.; Stryker, J. M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9702-9703. (c) Dzwiniel, T. L.; Etkin, N.;
Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10640-10641. (d) From
cyclopentenyl ring expansion: Dzwiniel, T. L.; Stryker, J. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 9184-9185.
complex converts slowly and quantitatively at room temperature
to η5-pentadienyl complex 8. Similarly, solvolysis of allyl chloride
complex 1b15 in trifluoroethanol containing DMAD gives the
analogous but neutral vinyl olefin complex 10 in near quantitative
yield.9
Complexes 9 and 10 transform selectively to η1,η4-cycloadducts
on treatment with a second alkyne. Optimal yields and selectivity
are obtained from neutral complex 10 under conditions of assisted
ionization, providing η1,η4-cycloheptadienyl complexes 11 and 13
from the reactions of ethyne and 2-butyne, respectively (Scheme
1).9,16 Structurally distinct minor products are isolated from each
reaction, including the unusual acyclic η3,η2-heptadienyl complex
12, which presumably arises from allylic C-H bond activation
following migratory insertion of ethyne. Structural assignments for
complexes 12, 13, and 14 have been confirmed by X-ray crystal-
lography.9
(5) Mn/η3-allyl/R,ω-diyne: (a) Tang, J.; Shinokubo, H.; Oshima, K. Orga-
nometallics 1998, 17, 290-292. (b) Nishikawa, T.; Kakiya, H.; Shinokubo,
H.; Oshima, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4629-4630.
(6) Other recent [3 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition reactions: (a) Baluenga, J.; Barrio,
P.; Lo´pez, L. A.; Toma´s, M.; Garc´ıa-Granda, S.; Alvarez-Ru´a, C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3008-3011. (b) Saito, S.; Masudo, M.;
Komegawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10540-10541.
(7) (a) Lutsenko, Z. L.; Aleksandrov, G. G.; Petrovskii, P. V.; Shubina, E.
S.; Andrianov, V. G.; Struchkov, Y. T.; Rubezhov, A. Z. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1985, 281, 349-364. (b) Lutsenko, Z. L.; Petrovskii, P.; Bezrukova,
A.; Rubezhov, A. Z. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR 1988, 735-738.
(8) Older, C. M.; Stryker, J. M. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5596-5598.
(9) Complete experimental details are provided as Supporting Information.
(10) The minor product 3 is spectroscopically very similar to Rubezhov’s
[(C6H6)Ru(2,3,4,5-tetramethyl-1-methanocyclohexadiene)]+PF6- complex.7b
(11) Complex 4 is spectroscopically identical to the known PF6 salt.2c
-
(12) The substitution pattern for η5-cycloheptadienyl complex 5 is identical to
that obtained from (C5Me5)Co(allyl)OTf and 3,3-dimethyl-1-butyne.4b
(13) Phenylacetylene undergoes oligomerization rather than cyclization. Di-
substituted alkynes undergo exclusive [3 + 2] cycloaddition with
concomitant demethylation of the hexamethylbenzene ligand.8 Reactions
involving 2-butyne (g2 equiv) diverge substantially and will be discussed
elsewhere.
The unique coordination of the η1,η4-cycloheptadienyl ring
suggested the use of oxidative bond heterolysis as a novel
demetalation strategy, simultaneously effecting both scission of the
metal-carbon σ-bond and minimization of metal-diene back-
bonding.17 In the event, exhaustive iodinolysis indeed mediates the
decomplexation of cycloadducts 7 and 11, returning the unusual
tricyclic lactones 17 in moderate to good yields (Scheme 3).9,18
The Ru(III) coproduct was identified crystallographically as triiodide
salt 18,9 accounting for the unexpected stoichiometry in iodine.
Direct chromatography of the crude reaction mixture without
thiosulfate workup unmasks the latent seven-membered ring,
providing cycloheptatriene 19 exclusively.9,19 Iodinolysis of complex
13 leads directly to cycloheptatriene anhydride 20 in as yet variable
yields,9 a bicyclic ring system of considerable synthetic interest.20
The use of stoichiometric (but recyclable) ruthenium obviously
limits the potential use of this cycloaddition reaction in organic
synthesis. Nonetheless, the strong preference for η1,η4-coordination
of the seven-membered ring is unique in transition metal chemistry,
offering mechanistic insight and raising new opportunities for
developing synthetically valuable metal-mediated cycloaddition and
demetalation reactions.
(14) Neither the cobalt nor the iridium system reacts with DMAD. No tractable
product was obtained from the reaction of DMAD with (C6H6)Ru(allyl)+.7
(15) Bennett, M. A.; Huang, T.-N.; Turney, T. W. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1979, 312-313.
(16) That η1,η4-complexes 7, 11, and 13 face no significant kinetic barrier to
conjugation is strongly suggested by the isolation of η5-cycloheptadienyl
complex 15 in modest yield (42%) as the major among many products
obtained from the reaction of complex 10 with phenylacetylene:9
(17) This demetalation strategy fails in the cobalt η5-cycloheptadienyl series.
(18) This extensive transformation presumably involves intramolecular iodo-
lactonization/iodide elimination, with concomitant iodide-mediated ester
demethylation. Related, completely organic, transformations are known:
Garratt,D.G.;Ryan,M.D.;Beaulieu,P.L. J.Org.Chem.1980,45,839-845.
(19) This process nominally involves lactone elimination followed, presumably,
by cycloreversion driven by norcaradiene/cycloheptatriene equilibration.
(20) See, for example: (a) Tanino, K.; Shimizu, T.; Miyama, M.; Kuwajima,
I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6116-6117. (b) Wockenfufl, B.; Wolff,
C.; Tochtermann, W. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13703-13708. (c) Bowden,
S. L.; Harris, S. A.; Heller, H. G.; Hewlins, M. J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1992, 725-728. (d) Rainer, H. Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1985, 24, 594-596.
JA0556023
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 41, 2005 14203