12
G. Abbas et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1050 (2013) 10–14
Table 2
Table 4
Data collection of 2-{(E)-[(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)imino]methyl}phenol.
Selected optimized bond lengths in Angstrom (Å), bond angles and dihedral angles
(degrees) at the B3LYP/6-31G** and 6-31 + G* level of theories.
Radiation source: SuperNova (Mo) X-ray source
Detector resolution: 10.4223 pixels mmꢁ1
1731 independent
reflections
1448 reflections with
Bond lengths
Bond angles
Dihedral angles
B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory
I > 2r(I)
N2AC4
C4AC5
N1AC4
N1AC26
1.343 N2AC4AC5
1.400 N2AC4AN1
1.408 C4AN1AC26
122.73 N2AC4AN1AC26
119.81 C4AN1AC26AC16
120.13 O3AC17AC16AC26 ꢁ0.00
ꢁ0.04
x
scans
Rint = 0.027
180.00
Absorption correction: multi-scan
Empirical absorption correction (CrysAlis RED,
Oxford Diffraction)
hmax = 25.0°, hmin = 3.3°
h = ꢁ53
1.298 N1AC26AC16 121.67
C16AC26 1.444 C16AC17AO3 121.76
O3AC17 1.338
Tmin = 0.563, Tmax = 1.000
2539 measured reflections
k = ꢁ1110
l = ꢁ1629
6-31 + G* level of theory
N2AC4
C4AC5
N1AC4
N1AC26
1.343 N2AC4AC5
1.401 N2AC4AN1
1.409 C4AN1AC26
122.64 N2AC4AN1AC26
120.01 C4AN1AC26AC16
120.42 O3AC17AC16AC26 ꢁ0.007
0.23
ꢁ179.98
Table 3
Refinement Data of 2-{(E)-[(6-methylpyridin-2-yl)imino]methyl}phenol.
1.297 N1AC26AC16 122.04
C16AC26 1.448 C16AC17AO3 121.86
O3AC17 1.344
Refinement on F2
Hydrogen site location: inferred from
neighboring sites
Experimental data
Least-squares matrix: full
H atoms treated by a mixture of
independent and constrained
refinement
N2AC4
C4AC5
N1AC4
N1AC26
1.338 N2AC4AC5
1.390 N2AC4AN1
1.417 C4AN1AC26
123.34 N2AC4AN1AC26
119.43 C4AN1AC26AC16
119.13 O3AC17AC16AC26 ꢁ1.26
4.25
179.27
R[F2 > 2
r
(F2)] = 0.059
w = 1/[r
2(Fo2) + (0.1264P)2 + 0.6527P]
wR(F2) = 0.179
1.300 N1AC26AC16 121.27
where P ¼ ðF2o þ 2Fc2Þ=3
C16AC26 1.441 C16AC17AO3 120.90
O3AC17 1.360
S = 0.88
1731 reflections
153 parameters
0 restraints
Primary atom site location:
structure-invariant direct
methods
(D/r)max < 0.001
D
D
q
q
max = 0.20 e Åꢁ3
min = ꢁ0.26 e Åꢁ3
Extinction correction: none
Absolute structure: Flack H D (1983),
Acta Cryst. A39, 876–881
Secondary atom site location:
difference Fourier map
Flack parameter: 3 (4)
Scheme 1. Schematic representation of the synthesis of (1) with chemical
structure.
Fig. 3. Atomic numbering scheme for MPMP used for computational analysis.
studies. Thermal analysis and electronic spectra were also deter-
mined. The results from TGA/DSC indicate that the compound
decomposes in a single step between the temperature ranges
170–234 °C. The heat flow indicates two prominent endothermal
changes, one at 64.69 °C which is due to the melting of compound
and other at 238.09 °C.
Thus we selected the B3LYP/6-31 + G* level of theory for further
investigations.
3.2. Electronic properties
We were interested in exploring the electronic structure and
HOMO/LUMO make up of (1). For this purpose, first the geometry
was optimized using DFT (B3LYP with 6-31G** and 6-31 + G* basis
sets), the initial structure coordinates were taken from XRD data.
Electronic spectrum was computed using time-dependent DFT
(TD-B3LYP with basis set 6-31 + G*). The effect of different solvents
such as DMF, DMSO, MeOH and EtOH on the absorption spectra
was evaluated using PCM.
In Fig. 4 the distribution patterns of frontier molecular orbitals,
i.e., highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs), first highest
occupied molecular orbitals (HOMOs-1), lowest unoccupied
molecular orbitals (LUMOs) and first lowest unoccupied molecular
orbitals (LUMOs + 1) at the ground state have been shown. The
HOMO and HOMO-1 are delocalized throughout the backbone.
The electron activating group (methyl) has no any contribution
in the formation of HOMO and HOMO-1. The LUMO is distributed
on whole of the compound while LUMO + 1 is localized on pyridine
moiety and methyl group. The nitrogen of pyridine has small con-
tribution in the formation of HOMO and HOMO-1. Contrary, more
charge is localized on nitrogen in LUMO and LUMO + 1. The oxygen
of hydroxyl group is taking part in the formation of HOMO and
HOMO-1 while little participation in the formation of LUMO and
no contribution in LUMO + 1. The HOMO, HOMO-1, LUMO,
LUMO + 1 energies, HOMO–LUMO energy gap (Eg) in eV for S0 state
at the B3LYP/6-31G** and B3LYP/6-31 + G* level of theories have
been presented in Table 5. The HOMO, HOMO-1, LUMO and
LUMO + 1 energies are smaller at B3LYP/6-31 + G* level of theory
3.1. Geometries
The geometrical parameters i.e., bond lengths, bond angles and
dihedral angles have been presented in Table 4, atomic numbering
scheme is given in Fig. 3. The bond lengths and bond angles at
B3LYP/6-31G** and B3LYP/6-31 + G* level of theories are in good
agreement with the experimental parameters. The torsion angles
at B3LYP/6-31 + G* level of theory are in better agreement with
experimental data. From Table 4, it can be seen that B3LYP/6-
31 + G* level of theory is better than B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory.