A R T I C L E S
Myers et al.
addition, called the Stetter reaction, employs conjugate acceptors
and produces 1,4-dicarbonyl products.40,41 The continued de-
velopment of these two related reactions has received significant
attention recently and offers new opportunities for unconven-
tional synthetic strategies.
nation R-keto acids in the presence of thiamin diphosphate-
dependent enzymes address these criteria well (eq 1). Although
the biochemical aspects of these enzymes have been studied
extensively, significant potential exists to utilize this process
for carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions.6,7,59-62 The genera-
tion of carbonyl anions in this manner has been applied to both
the benzoin and the Stetter reaction. For example, Mu¨ller63-65
and Patel66 have separately reported cross-benzoin reactions
between R-keto acids and aldehydes catalyzed by various
decarboxylase enzymes. In a seminal study, Stetter demonstrated
that R-keto acids add to unsubstituted vinyl ketones in organic
media catalyzed by thiazolium salts in the presence of an amine
base.67 These mechanistically related systems provided the
impetus for us to initiate a study to fully explore this carbonyl
anion strategy in the broadest context possible. In general, the
addition of nucleophiles to â-substituted conjugate acceptors is
considerably more challenging than adding to related vinyl
ketones because they are far less reactive due to steric
congestion.68 Furthermore, we anticipated that the investigation
of this reaction manifold with various classes of conjugate
acceptors would expand the synthetic utility of this process. We
also predicted that the neutral aqueous environment of the
original thiamin-dependent enzymes would ultimately be the
best conditions to generate useful carbonyl anions. These
buffered catalytic conditions would have the potential to tolerate
base- or acid-labile functionality and/or protecting groups that
could be present when combining complex and/or sensitive
fragments.69-71 We report herein that simple analogues of
thiamin diphosphate catalyze the conjugate addition of R-keto
salts (2) to R,â-unsaturated 2-acyl imidazoles (3) under neutral
aqueous conditions to afford 1,4-dicarbonyl compounds in
excellent yield (eq 2).
Many catalytic benzoin and Stetter reactions utilize aldehydes
as the nucleophilic precursor. These approaches can be com-
plicated by the intrinsic high reactivity of the aldehyde because
the intermediate carbonyl anion produced during the reaction
can undergo addition to the starting aldehyde, thereby affording
self-condensation products. A successful strategy to minimize
this potential problem is to generate an intramolecular system
by tethering the aldehyde functional group to the electrophile.42-45
An alternative approach is to utilize a carbonyl anion precursor
that does not possess an aldehyde, thus removing this reactive
moiety from the reaction completely. The identification and
development of such a precursor should consequently provide
the opportunity for a general intermolecular carbonyl anion
process. In general, this strategy should allow for a broad
inclusion of many classes of electrophiles, and the carbonyl
anion generated in situ would not compete between addition to
the desired substrate and addition to the aldehyde precursor.
Our laboratory has recently reported that intermolecular con-
jugate addition reactions and additions to activated imines with
acylsilanes as the carbonyl anion precursors can be catalyzed
by thiazolium-derived carbenes.46-48 The use of these silicon-
based carbonyl anion precursors avoids self-condensation, and
we have demonstrated that acylsilanes undergo 1,2-silyl shifts
(Brook rearrangements)49-51 in the presence of neutral Lewis
bases, which in turn generate competent carbonyl anions. The
use of acylsilanes as carbonyl anions is well documented, and
this strategy can offer distinct advantages over aldehydes when
employing this Umpolung reactivity pattern.52-58
During our studies with acylsilanes, we initiated an investiga-
tion of additional carbonyl anion precursors that would undergo
Stetter-type reactions under catalytic conditions and avoid any
potential self-condensation problems. Interestingly, the combi-
(37) Ide, W. S.; Buck, J. S. Org. React. 1948, 4, 269-303.
(38) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Teles, J. H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996, 79, 1217-
1221.
(39) Knight, R. L.; Leeper, F. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 1891-
1893.
(40) Stetter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 639-712.
(41) Stetter, H.; Kuhlmann, H. Org. React. 1991, 40, 407-496.
(42) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Runsink, J.; Teles, J. H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996,
79, 1899-1902.
(43) Kerr, M. S.; de Alaniz, J. R.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
10298-10299.
(44) de Alaniz, J. R.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6284-6289.
(45) Hachisu, Y.; Bode, J. W.; Suzuki, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8432-
8433.
(46) Mattson, A. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 2314-2315.
Results and Discussion
(47) Mattson, A. E.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4363-4366.
(48) Bharadwaj, A. R.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2465-2468.
(49) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77-84.
(50) Brook, A. G.; LeGrow, G. E.; MacRae, D. M. Can. J. Chem. 1967, 45,
239-253.
Our initial investigations focused on combining R-keto acids
and thiazolium salts with a conjugate acceptor that would
(51) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065-2084.
(52) Page, P. C. B.; Klair, S. S.; Rosenthal, S. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1990, 19, 147-
195.
(59) Kluger, R.; Chin, J.; Smyth, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 884-888.
(60) Polovnikova, E. S.; McLeish, M. J.; Sergienko, E. A.; Burgner, J. T.;
Anderson, N. L.; Bera, A. K.; Jordan, F.; Kenyon, G. L.; Hasson, M. S.
Biochemistry 2003, 42, 1820-1830.
(53) Cirillo, P. F.; Panek, J. S. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1992, 24, 553-582.
(54) Degl’Innocenti, A.; Ricci, A.; Mordini, A.; Reginato, G.; Colotta, V. Gazz.
Chim. Ital. 1987, 117, 645-648.
(61) Chen, Y. T.; Jordan, F. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5029-5038.
(62) Frank, R. A. W.; Titman, C. M.; Pratap, J. V.; Luisi, B. F.; Perham, R. N.
Science 2004, 306, 872-876.
(55) Ricci, A.; Degl’Innocenti, A.; Chimichi, S.; Fiorenza, M.; Rossini, G. J.
Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 130-133.
(56) Schinzer, D.; Heathcock, C. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 1881-1884.
(57) Linghu, X.; Bauch, C. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
1833-1840.
(63) Demir, A. S.; Dunnwald, T.; Iding, H.; Pohl, M.; Muller, M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4769-4774.
(64) Dunnwald, T.; Demir, A. S.; Siegert, P.; Pohl, M.; Muller, M. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 2161-2170.
(58) Nahm, M. R.; Linghu, X.; Potnick, J. R.; Yates, C. M.; White, P. S.;
Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2377-2379.
(65) Pohl, M.; Lingen, B.; Muller, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 5289-5295.
9
14676 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 42, 2005