T. Rosenau, A. Stanger / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005) 7845–7848
7847
Oxidation of both compounds 3 and 4 was carried out
Acknowledgements
by either Ag2O or elemental bromine at room tempera-
ture. For determination of the transient ortho-quinone
The financialsupport by the Austrian Fonds zur Fo¨rde-
rung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Project P-17428
is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would like to
thank Dr. Andreas Hofinger, Department of Chemistry
at the University of NaturalResources and Applied Life
Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, for recording the NMR
spectra.
methides, we used the fast trapping reaction in excess
10
ethylvinylether, as described in eariler work.
Upon
oxidation, compound 3 afforded the two oQMs 3a and
3b which were trapped as 5 and 6 in a 48/52 ratio inde-
pendent of the oxidant used, which proved that there
was no oxidation regioselectivity at all.11 In the case of
compound 4, the two ortho-quinone methides 4a and
4b were even formed in a perfect 50/50 ratio as reflected
by the 50/50 ratio found for the two trapping products 7
and 8 (Scheme 3).
References and notes
1. Packer, L.; Fuchs, J. Vitamin E in Health and Disease;
MarcelDekker: New York, 1993; For a generalreview on
chromans and tocopherols, see: Parkhurst, R. M.; Skin-
ner, W. A. In Chromans and Tocopherols in Chemistry of
Heterocyclic Compounds; Ellis, G. P., Lockhardt, I. M.,
Eds.; Wiley: New York, 1981; Vol. 36.
2. For a recent review on oQM chemistry, see: van de Water,
R. W.; Pettus, T. R. R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5367–
5405.
3. Original work: (a) Mills, W. H.; Nixon, I. G. J. Chem. Soc.
1930, 2510–2525; See also a later review: (b) Badger, G. M.
Q. Rev. Chem. Soc. 1951, 5, 147.
4. Rosenau, T.; Ebner, G.; Stanger, A.; Perl, S.; Nuri, L.
Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 280–287.
5. For the definition of SIBL (Strain Induced Bond Local-
ization), see: (a) Stanger, A.; Ashkenazi, N.; Boese, R.;
Stellberg, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1997, 542, 19; Stanger,
A.; Ashkenazi, N.; Boese, R.; Stellberg, P. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1997, 548, 113; Stanger, A.; Ashkenazi, N.; Boese,
R.; Stellberg, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 556, 249; (b)
Stanger, A.; Tkachenko, E. J. Comp. Chem. 2001, 22,
1377, footnote 6; For recent reviews and investigation of
SIBL/Mills-Nixon effect see also: (c) Frank, N. L.; Siegel,
J. S. In Advances in Theoretically Interesting Molecules;
JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1995; Vol. 3, pp 209–260; (d)
It was shown that the oQM, which is formed upon oxi-
dation of the phenol, is similar to the intermediate which
is formed after the rate determining step, which, in turn,
contains the rate determining transition state.4 Thus, the
two possible oQMs for 3 and 4 (3a/3b and 4a/4b, respec-
tively) were calculated. The energy differences between
3a and 3b and 4a and 4b are small: 3b is by
0.1 kcalmol ꢀ1 more stable than 3a (ZPE corrected DE,
both have the same DH), and 4b is by 0.4 kcalmol ꢀ1
more stable than 4a (both ZPE corrected DE and DH),
that is, within the limitations of the theoretical method
each pair shows a comparable stability. The equal stabil-
ity of the different oQM isomers is perhaps best demon-
strated by comparing the energy of the isodesmic
equations 3a with 3b, and 4a with 4b. Within
0.2 kcalmol ꢀ1, each pair of equations shows the same
energy. Thus, it is clear from the calculations that in
the non-annulated systems there is no preference for
one of the two possible oQMs, in strong contrast to
the situation in the annulated systems.
3 þ 4a ! 4 þ 3a
ð3aÞ
DH = ꢀ0.9
´
´
´
´
Maksic, Z. B.; Eckert-Maksic, M.; Mo, O.; Yanez, M.
˜
DE(ZPE corrected) = ꢀ0.9 kcalmol ꢀ1
,
,
,
PaulingÕs Legacy: Modern Modelling of the Chemical
Bond. In Theoretical Computer Chemistry; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1999; Vol. 6, p 47; (e)
Stanger, A.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53,
4889; (f) Rappoport, Z.; Kobayashi, S.; Stanger, A.;
Boese, R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4370.
kcalmol ꢀ1
3 þ 4a ! 4 þ 3b
DE(ZPE corrected) = ꢀ0.7 kcalmol ꢀ1
ð3bÞ
DH = ꢀ0.8
kcalmol ꢀ1
6. (a) Isler, O.; Brubacher, G. Vitamins I; George Thieme:
Stuttgart, 1982; p 126; (b) Kamal-Eldin, A.; Appelqvist, L.
A. Lipids 1996, 31, 671–701; (c) Skinner, W. A. J. Med.
Chem. 1967, 10, 657–661; (d) Ref. 3b.
3 þ 4b ! 4 þ 3b
DE(ZPE corrected) = ꢀ0.3 kcalmol ꢀ1
ð4aÞ
DH = ꢀ0.4
7. 3-Ethyl-4-isopropoxy-2,5,6-trimethylphenol (3), fluffy pre-
kcalmol ꢀ1
1
cipitate of white, long needles, mp 123–125 ꢁC. H NMR:
3
d 1.21 (t, 3H, CH2–CH3, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.28 (d, 6H, CH–
3 þ 4b ! 4 þ 3a
ð4bÞ
(CH3)3, 3J = 6.2 Hz), 2.03, 2.09, 2.14 (3 · s, 3 · 3H,
3 · CH3), 2.61 (q, 2H, CH2–CH3, 3J = 7.6 Hz), 4.25 (sept,
1H, CH–(CH3)3, 3J = 6.2 Hz), 4.55 (s, 1H, OH). 13C
NMR: d 11.8, 12.1, 12.9 (3 · CH3), 13.2 (CH2–CH3), 19.8
(CH2–CH3), 22.0 (CH–(CH3)3), 75.7 (CH–(CH3)3), 114.8,
118.3, 119.1, 120.1, 145.6, 146.9 (ArC). Anal. Calcd for
C14H22O2 (222.33): C, 75.63; H, 9.97. Found: C, 75.47; H,
9.86.
DE(ZPE corrected) = ꢀ0.5 kcalmol ꢀ1
,
DH = ꢀ0.4
kcalmol ꢀ1
.
These results clearly disprove the notion that electronic
substituent effects exerted on the aromatic ring via C-4a
and O-1 determine the regioselectivity in oxidations of
vitamin E-like compounds. The observed regioselectiv-
ity is due to the annulation of the aromatic system to
an alicyclic ring, rather than due to mere substitution
at C-4a and O-1. The effect of the annulation strain on
the oxidation selectivity, that is, the ratio of the two pos-
sible ortho-quinone methides, can be smoothly explained
8. 4-Methoxy-2,3,6-trimethyl-5-(3-methyl-butyl)phenol (4),
1
white powder, mp 131–132 ꢁC. H NMR: d 1.07 (d, 6H,
CH–(CH3)2, 3J = 7.0 Hz), 1.60 (q, 2H, CH–CH2), 1.71 (m,
1H, CH(CH3)2), 2.05, 2.06, 2.12 (3 · s, 3 · 3H, 3 · CH3),
3
2.58 (t, 2H, ArC–CH2, J = 7.3 Hz), 6.12 (s, 1H, OH). 13C
NMR: d 12.1, 12.1, 12.8 (3 · CH3), 20.4 (ArC–CH2), 21.0
(CH–(CH3)2), 27.1 (CH–(CH3)2), 44.4 (CH–CH2), 56.9
(OCH3), 115.4, 117.6, 119.3, 121.1, 145.9, 148.2 (ArC).
4
by the SIBL modelas mentioned above.