Figure 4. Crystal structure of 4 with selected bond lengths [Å]
and angles [deg]: O2-C1 1.3587(15), O2-C3 1.5114(13), C1-
C2 1.5025(17), C2-C3 1.5374(17), C3-C4 1.5118(16), C4-C5
1.5251(18), C1-O2-C3 91.11(8), C4-C3-C2 116.60(11), C3-
C4-C5 112.03(10).
Figure 2. Crystal structure of 2 with selected bond lengths [Å]
and angles [deg]: O12-C11 1.347(3), O12-C14 1.465(2), C11-
C12 1.496(3), C12-C13, 1.535(3), C13-C18 1.521(3), C13-C14
1.548(3), C14-C15 1.519(3), C11-O12-C14 112.07(17), O12-
C11-C12 110.54(17), C11-C12-C13 105.48(17), C18-C13-
C14 114.36(16), C12-C13-C14 103.95(16), O12-C14-C13
104.98(15), C15-C14-C13, 113.95(17), C14-C15-C16, 111.16-
(17), C17-C16-C15 111.37(17).
decomposition of the intermediate monodiazoacetate is
slower than that for 1.
(E,E)-2,4-Hexadien-1,6-diyl bis-diazoacetate 5 was se-
lected for examination of double diastereoselection in
dirhodium(II)-catalyzed intramolecular cyclopropanation re-
actions (Table 2). Two diastereomeric products were
(4S/R-MEOX)4, and Rh2(4S-IBAZ)4 (Table 1, entries 2-5),
and enantioselectivities associated with its formation were
exceptional. The bis-spirolactone product 4 was a minor
product only formed in reactions with 1 catalyzed by Rh2-
(MEOX)4 and Rh2(5S-MEPY)4 (Table 1, entries 2-4), and
efforts to increase its production were not successful. The
major competing process in these reactions was “carbene
dimer” formation, especially with the more reactive catalysts,
such as Rh2(OAc)4, Rh2(4S-IBAZ)4, and Rh2(5S-MEPY)4;
only the sterically hindered oxaimidazolidine-ligated cata-
lysts, Rh2(4S-MPPIM)4 and Rh2(4S,S-BSPIM)4, suppressed
the formation of these products. Ordinarily, increasing the
time of addition of the diazo compound to the reaction
mixture containing the catalyst reduces this undesirable
reaction. However, in several instances, decreasing the time
for addition from 10 h (procedure B) to 2 h (procedure A)
led to a reduction in these dimeric and oligomeric products.
Furthermore, changes in addition time changed the ratio of
2:3:4, indicating that the diazoacetate remaining from the
first C-H insertion was being preferentially drawn down
this pathway, further suggesting that the rate for diazo
Table 2. Diastereoselectivity and Enantioselectivity from
Catalytic Double Cyclopropanation Reactions of 5a
yieldb
(%)
ee of 6bd
entry
catalyst
Rh2(OAc)4
6a:6bc
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
trace
54
79
21
78
91
90
79
78
Rh2(CAPY)4
48:52
45:55
33:67
24:76
18:82
7:93
Rh2(R/S-MEPY)4
Rh2(4R-MEAZ)4
Rh2(4R-MEOX)4
Rh2(5R-MEPY)4
Rh2(4R-MPPIM)4
Rh2(4S,S-BSPIM)4
Rh2(4S,R-MNACIM)4
11
82
86
96
99
99
99
4:96
5:95
a Reactions were performed by addition of 5 in CH2Cl2 over 10 h to a
refluxing CH2Cl2 solution of the catalyst (1.0 mol %). b Isolated yield after
chromatography. c Determined by 1H NMR in CD3CN. d Determined by
GC on Chiraldex B-DM column.
formed: 6a (1S,5R,6R,1′R,5′S,6′S)-[6,6′]bi(3-oxabicyclo-
[3.1.0]hexyl)-2,2′-dione, which is the meso product, and a
enantiomeric pair of R-6b, (1R,5S,6S,1′R,5′S,6′S)-[6,6′]bi-
[3-oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexyl]-2,2′-dione, and S-6b, (1S,5R,6R,1′S,
5′R,6′R)-[6,6′]bi[3-oxabicyclo[3.1.0]hexyl]-2,2′-dione. To de-
termine diastereoselectivity for the double cyclopropanation
reaction in the absence of the effects related to chiral ligands
Figure 3. Crystal structure depicting the (3aR,5R,7aR)-3 enanti-
omer with selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [deg]: O2-C1
1.359(3), C1-C2 1.509(4), C2-C3 1.524(4), C3-C8 1.502(4),
C7-C9 1.516(4), C7-C8 1.527(4), C9-C10 1.508(4), C10-O3
1.348(4), C1-C2-C3 85.2(2), C8-C3-C2 117.0(2), C9-C7-
C8 111.0(2), C3-C8-C7 112.5(2), C10-C9-C7 102.2(2).
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005
5037