A convenient and efficient workup of ozonolysis reactions using triethylamine

Article abstract of DOI:10.1080/00397919308011249

Comparisons were made between triethylamine and methyl sulfide for their use as a quenching agent in the ozonolysis of a variety of alkenes. The reactions involving triethylamine often gave better yields and proceeded faster than those of involving methyl sulfide. The role of triethylamine played as base instead of reducing agent in the reaction.

Full text of DOI:10.1080/00397919308011249

This article was downloaded by: [Monash University Library]
On: 07 January 2015, At: 22:31
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954
Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,
UK
Synthetic Communications: An
International Journal for Rapid
Communication of Synthetic
Organic Chemistry
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
A Convenient and Efficient
Workup of Ozonolysis
Reactions Using Triethylamine
Yung-Son Hon a , Sheng-Wun Lin b & Yao-Jung Chen b
a Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica , Nankang,
Taipei, Taiwan , 11529, R.O.C
b Department of Chemistry , National Chung-Hsing
University , Taichung, Taiwan, 40227, R.O.C.
Published online: 23 Sep 2006.
To cite this article: Yung-Son Hon , Sheng-Wun Lin & Yao-Jung Chen (1993) A
Convenient and Efficient Workup of Ozonolysis Reactions Using Triethylamine,
Synthetic Communications: An International Journal for Rapid Communication of
Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 23:11, 1543-1553, DOI: 10.1080/00397919308011249
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397919308011249
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with

primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions