Chemistry Letters Vol.34, No.10 (2005)
1383
*
(CH2)n
5*
4*
CH3B
*
CH=N
4’
TiCH3(4*)
TiCH2-(5*)
TiCH2-(5*)
4’
*
*
*
*
8.0
7.0
6.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
PPM
Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra (270 MHz: BrC6D5) of [C6F5N=CH(2-O-C6H4)]TiMeþ[MeB(C6F5)3]ꢁ (4ꢀ, bottom) and [C6F5N=CH(2-
O-C6H4)]Ti(CH2CH2)nMeþ[MeB(C6F5)3]ꢁ (5ꢀ, top). The asterisks indicate protio impurities of NMR solvent and pentane.
pairs with metallocene dialkyls,1 also resulted in oily precipita-
References and Notes
1
2
E. Y.-X. Chen and T. J. Marks, Chem. Rev., 100, 1391 (2000).
H. Makio, N. Kashiwa, and T. Fujita, Adv. Synth. Catal., 344, 477
(2002).
tion in toluene at 8.1 mM [Ti], implying significant cation–anion
separation of this species.12 Sterically much less encumbered
complex 4 with B(C6F5)3 also gave an oily species (4ꢀ) in tol-
uene-d8 (13.3 mM [Ti]), thus the origin of the ion separation is
not primarily steric. 1H NMR spectra of 4ꢀ verify the formation
of a cationic methyl species with some minor species (40) that is
not observed for 3ꢀ. The identity of the minor species is un-
known at this moment but could be a Me-bridged dinuclear spe-
cies due to reduced steric bulk of 4ꢀ. The 1H NMR shifts of
3
4
a) M. Mitani, J. Mohri, Y. Yoshida, J. Saito, S. Ishii, K. Tsuru, S.
Matsui, R. Furuyama, T. Nakano, H. Tanaka, S. Kojoh, T.
Matsugi, N. Kashiwa, and T. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124,
3327 (2002). b) M. Mitani, R. Furuyama, J. Mohri, J. Saito, S.
Ishii, H. Terao, T. Nakano, H. Tanaka, and T. Fujita, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 125, 4293 (2003).
P. D. Knight, A. J. Clarke, B. S. Kimberley, R. A. Jackson, and
P. Scott, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 2002, 352.
H. Makio and T. Fujita, Macromol. Symp., 213, 221 (2004).
K.-H. Thiele, P. Zdunneck, and D. Baumgart, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem., 378, 62 (1970).
ꢁ
MeB(C6F5)3 for 4ꢀ as a measure of ionic character13 are ca.
5
6
0.8 ppm in both toluene and bromobenzene that is almost identi-
cal to LiMeB(C6F5)3. We attribute this enhanced ion separation
to the formation of sterically more relaxed five-coordinated
trigonal bipyramidal cationic species that can compensate for
the energy gain due to the charge separation.
7
1H NMR (270 MHz, benzene-d6) ꢂ 7.55 (s, 1H, HC=N), 7.47 (s,
1H, HC=N), 7.44 (dd, J ¼ 3:6, 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.41 (dd,
J ¼ 3:6, 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.91 (dd, J ¼ 7:9, 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH),
6.81 (dd, J ¼ 7:9, 1.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.69 (dt, J ¼ 7:6, 1.7 Hz,
1.51 (s, 9H, tBu); 13C NMR (67.5 MHz, benzene-d6) ꢂ 174.7,
174.0, 163.7, 162.9, 140.2, 139.2, 136.2, 135.1, 134.6, 134.1,
124.6, 123.7, 121.0, 86.3, 35.5, 29.8–29.3; Anal. Found: C,
51.16; H, 2.86; N, 3.44%. Calcd for C28H16F10N2O2Ti: C,
50.81; H, 3.53; N, 3.39%. The discrepancy in elemental analyses
is due to instability of the complex.
Upon addition of ethylene (ca. 5 equiv. to [Ti]) to 4ꢀ in bro-
mobenzene-d5, peak intensity of species 4ꢀ decreases along with
the appearance of new signals as shown in Figure 2. Particularly
notable are the signals at 2.88 and 1.45 ppm that are assignable
to the diastereotopic ꢀ-methylene protons of the propagating
‘‘living’’ species (5ꢀ). The minor species (40) is virtually inactive
to ethylene polymerization and there is no double bond forma-
tion indicative of chain transfers. It should be noted that NMR
experiments were conducted at room temperature and that after
9 h, species 5ꢀ remained almost unchanged though 4ꢀ slightly
decreased in intensity. The same experiment for 3ꢀ also exhibits
a living propagating species (4.59 and 3.15 ppm for –CH2Ti),
although it was rather difficult to control the reaction due to
the high activity of this species14 under the conditions currently
applied.
In conclusion, we have shown that monomethyl and dimeth-
yl Ti-FI catalysts with perfluorinated N-aryl groups are accessi-
ble. These complexes can be activated by common boron coca-
talysts without the use of alkylaluminums and thus without re-
duction of the imine and Ti. The species obtained are similar
to MAO derived species in character and prove the extraordinary
robust livingness. The living propagating species can be ob-
served even at room temperature. In order to investigate dynam-
ic solution structure and polymerization mechanism of FI Cata-
lysts, including the proposed ortho-F–ꢁ-H interaction,3 and con-
figurational fluxionality,3b,15 more extensive NMR and other
spectroscopic studies are currently underway and will be report-
ed in due course.
t
2H, ArH), 1.97 (d, J ¼ 2:0 Hz, 3H, CH3-Ti), 1.57 (s, 9H, Bu),
8
9
D. Duncan and T. Livinghouse, Organometallics, 18, 4421 (1999).
1H NMR (270 MHz, benzene-d6) ꢂ 7.52 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.45 (dd,
J ¼ 7:6, 1.7 Hz, 2H, ArH), 6.88 (dd, J ¼ 7:6, 1.7 Hz, 2H, ArH),
6.72 (t, J ¼ 7:7 Hz, 2H, ArH), 1.65 (s, 6H, CH3-Ti), 1.58 (s,
t
18H, Bu); 19F NMR (471 MHz, benzene-d6) ꢂ ꢁ149:3 (d, o-F),
ꢁ160:3 (t, p-F), ꢁ164:2 (m, m-F); Anal. Found: C, 56.12; H,
3.07; N, 3.60%. Calcd for C36H32F10N2O2Ti: C, 56.71; H, 4.23;
N, 3.67%. The discrepancy in elemental analyses is due to instabil-
ity of the complex.
10 1H NMR (270 MHz, toluene-d8) ꢂ 7.38 (s, 2H, HC=N), 7.11–7.05
(m, 2H, ArH), 6.81–6.77 (m, 4H, ArH), 6.59 (dt, J ¼ 7:6, 1.0 Hz,
2H, ArH), 1.67 (s, 6H, CH3-Ti); 19F NMR (471 MHz, benzene-d6)
ꢂ ꢁ147:0, ꢁ149:5 (br, o-F), ꢁ160:9 (t, p-F), ꢁ163:3, ꢁ164:6 (br,
m-F); Anal. Found: C, 50.69; H, 1.33; N, 4.22%. Calcd for
C
28H16F10N2O2Ti: C, 51.72; H, 2.48; N, 4.31%. The discrepancy
in elemental analyses is due to instability of the complex.
11 In fact, a 1:1 mixture of 3ꢀ and 2 gave a similar spectrum to 2ꢀ.
12 C. Zuccaccia, N. G. Stahl, A. Macchioni, M.-C. Chen, J. A.
Roberts, and T. J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126, 1448 (2004).
13 S. Beck, S. Lieber, F. Schaper, A. Geyer, and H.-H. Brintzinger,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 123, 1483 (2001).
14 R. Furuyama, M. Mitani, J. Mohri, R. Mori, H. Tanaka, and T.
Fujita, Macromolecules, 38, 1546 (2005).
15 Y. Tohi, H. Makio, S. Matsui, M. Onda, and T. Fujita, Macromo-
lecules, 36, 523 (2003).
Published on the web (Advance View) September 10, 2005; DOI 10.1246/cl.2005.1382