Organic Letters
Letter
Further removal of the sulfonyl with LiAlH4 or ring cleavage
with MeMgBr could lead to α-aryl-β,γ-alkenyl α-amino amides
7 and 8 in good yields, while maintaining the same level of
enantioselectivity (eq 2). It is noteworthy that this kind of β,γ-
unsaturated α-amino acid and their derivatives are important
structural motifs presented in many biologically active natural
products and pharmaceutical agents,12 and catalytic asymmetric
approaches to access such quaternary-containing β,γ-unsatu-
rated α-amino acid units remain considerably underdeveloped.
Finally, the availability of the current methodology can also
be featured by the intriguing synthetic transformations of the
alkenylation product 3aa (Scheme 5). Treatment of 3aa with
heterocycle sulfamide derivatives that possess great potential in
drug discovery. We believe that this method will find wide
application in organic synthesis and medicinal chemistry.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
Experimental procedures, characterization data, and
copies of NMR and HPLC spectra (PDF)
Accession Codes
Scheme 5. Transformations of Alkenylation Product 3aa
lographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road,
Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
ORCID
Author Contributions
§Y.L. and B.L. contributed equally.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
allyl bromide in the presence of K2CO3 in DMF at room
temperature for 2 h, followed by the olefin metathesis using the
second-generation Grubbs catalyst, afforded the dihydropyrrole
derivative 9 in 90% yield for two steps. Similarly, treatment of
3aa with 3-bromopropyne, followed by cyclization under
typical Pauson−Khand reaction conditions, efficiently delivered
chiral quaternary carbon-containing fused cyclopenta[c]proline
derivatives 10a and 10b in 34% and 47% yields without erosion
of the ee. The stereochemistry of 10a and 10b were determined
by X-ray crystallographic analysis and NOE experimentation
(see SI), respectively. Furthermore, ammoniation of alkenyla-
tion product 3aa could also be conducted smoothly in the
presence of ammonia or benzylamine to provide the
corresponding products 11 and 12 in excellent yield without
any loss of enantioselectivity. Interestingly, the proton signal
indicated that CN of compound 11 is located outside the
ring, which is different from the case in compound 12.
In summary, we have developed an efficient protocol for the
challenging asymmetric addition of alkenyl nucleophiles to
ketimines. Under rhodium catalysis with a simple open-chain
chiral phosphite-olefin as a ligand, the reaction of diverse
vinylboronic acids with varied 3-substituted-4-aryl-1,2,5-thia-
diazole 1,1-dioxides could proceed smoothly at room temper-
ature, enabling reliable access to a broad range of functional
α,α-disubstituted chiral allylic amines bearing quaternary
stereocenters in high yields with good to excellent enantiose-
lectivities (up to 99% ee). The method is promising and
notable because it can be applied to access highly valuable
enantioenriched β,γ-unsaturated α-amino amides and vicinal
diamines with ease of removal of sulfonyl. Furthermore, the
products can be easily transformed into a series of interesting
■
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(21472205, 81521005, 21502207, 21325209) and the Shanghai
Municipal Committee of Science and Technology
(15YF1414600) for financial support.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Nugent, T. C. Chiral Amine Synthesis: Methods, Developments and
Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2010.
(2) For a review, see: Skoda, E. M.; Davis, G. C.; Wipf, P. Org. Process
Res. Dev. 2012, 16, 26.
(3) For reviews, see: (a) Johannsen, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Rev.
1998, 98, 1689. (b) Trost, B. M.; Crawley, M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
2921. (c) Helmchen, G.; Dahnz, A.; Dubon, P.; Schelwies, M.;
̈
Weihofen, R. Chem. Commun. 2007, 675. (d) Lu, Z.; Ma, S.-M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 258. (e) Hartwig, J. F.; Stanley, L. M. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1461.
(4) For recent representative examples, see: (a) Arnold, J. S.;
Nguyen, H. M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8380. (b) Cai, A.; Guo,
W.; Martínez-Rodríguez, L.; Kleij, A. W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138,
14194. (c) Wang, X.; Guo, P.; Han, Z.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.; Ding, K. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 405. (d) Lafrance, M.; Roggen, M.;
Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3470. (e) Grange, R.
L.; Clizbe, E. A.; Counsell, E. J.; Evans, P. A. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 777.
(f) Kawatsura, M.; Uchida, K.; Terasaki, S.; Tsuji, H.; Minakawa, M.;
Itoh, T. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1470.
(5) For a review, see: (a) Nomura, H.; Richards, C. J. Chem. - Asian J.
2010, 5, 1726. For recent examples, see: (b) Fischer, D. F.; Xin, Z.-Q.;
Peters, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7704. (c) Fischer, D. F.;
Barakat, A.; Xin, Z.-Q.; Weiss, M. E.; Peters, R. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009,
15, 8722. (d) Jiang, G.; Halder, R.; Fang, Y.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 9752. (e) Hellmuth, T.; Rieckhoff, S.; Weiss, M.; Dorst,
K.; Frey, W.; Peters, R. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1850.
D
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX