may or may not contain a substituent in the C8 position,
according to our different retrosynthetic pathways. Our
results are summarized in Table 1.
Scheme 1
Table 1. Ring-Size Selectivity of RCM
cat.
5 mol %
time
(h)
ring
size 8/9a
conva
(%)
entry R1
R2
R3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Mom
Mom
Mom
Mom
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
CORf
Ab
Bc
Cd
De
A
B
C
D
B
96
17
96
17
96
96
96
96
17
17
96
6
5
80
60
99
16
70
7
55
75
1/7
<1/>99
1/6.5
<1/>99
1/9
1/2.7
<5/>95
<5/>95
Me
Me
Me Mom
In pathway B, a regioselective CM provides an intermedi-
ate that can be converted to the 8-substituted RCM precursor
5 by deprotection and esterification. It was envisaged that
the selectivety in the CM of 6 and 4 could be controlled
either by chelating effects or by the steric hindrance of the
protecting group PG′.7 Following the synthesis of intermedi-
ate 2 by either pathway A or B, esterification and deprotec-
tion would then give phomopsolide C.
The main challenge in this strategy is controlling the ring-
size selectivity of RCM, because of the possibility of either
forming the desired six- or the undesired five-membered ring.
A number of examples where a six-membered ring has been
formed selectively are known, e.g., natural (5′-oxoheptene-
1′E,3′E-dienyl)-5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one,8 (+)-strictifo-
lione,9 and spicigerolide10 by using either the Grubbs catalyst
I or II. These examples have two important structural
differences to our precursor for RCM as given in pathway
A: (1) no substitution in the C5 position and (2) a substituent
in the C8 position (see Scheme 1). It has been demonstrated
in related systems having no substitution in the C8 position
that mixtures of five- and six-membered rings are obtained.11
RCM of precursors with a protected hydroxy group at the
C5 position and no substitution in postion C8 (e.g., (-)-
muricatacin12 and rollicosin13) result in the formation of the
five-membered ring exclusively when using Grubbs catalyst
II.
10
11
12
H
D
A-D
D
>95
<5
>99
H
H
>99/<1
1
a Estimated from H NMR of the crude reaction mixure. In each case,
the remainder was the starting material. b Grubbs I: PhCHdRuCl2(PCy3)2.
c Grubbs II: PhCHdRuCl2(PCy3)(IHMes). d Hoveyda: o-isopropoxy-
PhCHdRuCl2(PCy3). e See Scheme 2. f See 5 (Scheme 1)
In the case where R1 ) R2 ) R3 ) H (entries 1-4), the
first-generation Grubbs and Hoveyda catalysts gave exclu-
sively the five-membered ring, in agreement with previously
reported studies.12,13 Interestingly, though, the second-genera-
tion catalysts yielded appreciable amounts of 8. We hypoth-
esised that the double bond on which metathesis commenced
governed the size selectivity of the RCM. For this reason,
we investigated the use of the methoxymethylene protecting
group (Mom) in order to pre-coordinate the catalyst at OR2
(entries 5-8). We hoped that this would encourage reaction
at the neighboring alkene, favoring six-membered ring
formation. In most cases, the amount of 8 was increased
appreciably. This is the first time that formation of a six-
membered ring, for a system substituted at the C5 position
but with no substitution at the C8 position, has been
observed. We were also interested in the effect of incorporat-
ing an electron withdrawing enone at R3 (entry 12). Gratify-
ingly, it was found that metathesis with this substrate led
exclusively to the six-membered ring 8 in excellent yield.
We now had conditions for RCM that we hoped would
give us the core of phomopsolide C. Our model studies
indicated that the electron-withdrawing side chain of the
natural product precursor 5 would control the reaction
outcome, directing the metathesis to the sterically less
hindered, more electron rich double bond of the allylic
alcohol. This would give the six-membered ring 16 (Scheme
2).
Bearing these results in mind, we first investigated reaction
conditions for the exclusive formation of the six-membered
ring 8 when starting from a 5-substituted precursor 7 which
(7) BouzBouz, S.; Simmons, R.; Cossy, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 20, 3465.
(8) BouzBouz, S.; de Lamos, E.; Cossy, J.; Saez, J.; Franck, X.; Figadere,
B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2615.
(9) BouzBouz, S.; Cossy, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1995.
(10) Falomir, E.; Murga, J.; Ruiz, P.; Carda, M.; Marco, J. A. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 5672.
(11) Virolleaud, M.-A.; Piva, O. Synlett. 2004, 12, 2087.
(12) Quinn, K. J.; Isaacs, A. K.; Arvary R. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 23, 4143.
(13) Quinn, K. J.; Isaacs, A. K.; DeChristopher, B. A.; Szklarz, S. C.;
Arvary R. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1243.
The precursor for CM 12 was available in a few steps
starting from commercial diethyl L-tartrate 10. After protec-
5514
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 24, 2005