Communications
[4] a) G. M. Tsivgoulis, J.-M. Lehn, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1188 –
1191; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1119 – 1122;
b) N. P. M. Huck, B. L. Feringa, J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun.
1995, 1095 – 1096; c) H. Spreitzer, J. Daub, Liebigs Ann. 1995,
1637 – 1641; d) J. Daub, M. Beck, A. Knorr, H. Spreitzer, Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 1399 – 1404; e) T. Inada, S. Uchida, Y.
Yokoyama, Chem. Lett. 1997, 321 – 322; f) A. Fernandez-
Acebes, J.-M. Lehn, Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 1519 – 1522; g) S.
Tsuchiya, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 48 – 53; h) J. M. Endtner,
F. Effenberger, A. Hartschuh, H. Port, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 3037 – 3046; i) T. B. Norsten, N. R. Branda, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 1784 – 1785; j) V. W.-W. Yam, C.-C. Ko, N. Zhu, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12734 – 12735.
[5] a) H. Spreitzer, J. Daub, Chem. Eur. J. 1996, 2, 1150 – 1158; b) J.
Achatz, C. Fischer, J. Salbeck, J. Daub, J. Chem. Soc. Chem.
Commun. 1991, 504 – 507; c) L. Gobbi, P. Seiler, F. Diederich, V.
Gramlich, Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1711 – 1723; d) T. Mrozek,
J. Daub, A. Ajayaghosh in Molecular Switches (Ed.: B. L.
Feringa), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2001, pp. 63 – 106; e) J. Daub,
C. Trieflinger, O. Kushnir, R. Prochazka, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst.
2005, 430, 115 – 122.
[6] a) H. Görner, C. Fischer, S. Gierisch, J. Daub, J. Phys. Chem.
1993, 97, 4110 – 4117; b) J. Ern, M. Petermann, T. Mrozek, J.
Daub, K. Kuldovꢀ, C. Kryschi, Chem. Phys. 2000, 259, 331 – 337;
c) V. De Waele, U. Schmidhammer, T. Mrozek, J. Daub, E.
Riedle, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2438 – 2439.
[7] a) J. Karolin, L. B.-A. Johansson, L. Strandberg, T. Ny, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 7801 – 7806; b) M. Kollmannsberger, T.
Gareis, S. Heinl, J. Breu, J. Daub, Angew. Chem. 1997, 109,
1391 – 1393; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1333 – 1335;
c) J. Daub, K. Kelnhofer, T. Gareis, A. Knorr, M. Kollmanns-
berger, Y.-H. Tak, H. Bꢁssler, Polym. Prepr. Am. Chem. Soc. Div.
Polym. Chem. 1997, 38, 339 – 340; d) R. Y. Lai, A. J. Bard, J.
Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5036 – 5042; e) P. Toele, H. Zhang, C.
Trieflinger, J. Daub, M. Glasbeek, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 368,
66 – 75.
[8] The ECL measurements were carried out with an unstirred
solution (c = 1 10ꢀ3 m; supporting electrolyte: 0.1m Bu4NPF6) in
an electrochemical cell: Stefan Hien, PhD Thesis, University of
Regensburg, 1995. The potential was switched with alternation
between the oxidation and reduction potentials (see inset of
Figure 2, electrochemical switching frequency 1 sꢀ1, scan rate of
the spectrometer: 240 nmminꢀ1). The spectrum consisting of
discrete signals is the result of the relatively slow switching
frequency. The bathochromic shift of ca. 20 nm between the
fluorescence and the ECL spectrum is well known and can be
attributed to reabsorption effects as a result of the higher dye
concentration used in the ECL experiment and the different
dielectric properties of the supporting electrolyte.
[9] VHF was reported to be entirely nonfluorescent, see ref. [6a].
[10] For a description of the analysis of FRET processes, see P. Wu, L.
Brand, Anal. Biochem. 1994, 218, 1 – 13. The following equations
apply: kFRET = (1/tD)(R0/r)6 with r being the distance between the
FRET partners and tD the lifetime of the unperturbed donor 3
(5.15 ns in CH2Cl2). R06 = 8.875 10ꢀ5(k2FDJ/n4) mit J =
sFD(l)eA(l)l4dl, where J is the overlap integral between the
fluorescence of the donor (i.e. 3 in CH2Cl2) and the absorption of
the acceptor, obtained after deconvolution of the absorption
spectrum of 1b, k2 = 2/3 is a geometry factor for random
orientation of the two subunits, FD is the fluorescence quantum
yield of the unperturbed donor (here, for model 3: FD = 0.95 in
CH2Cl2), and n is the refractive index of the solvent.
corresponds within Æ 0.2 to the distance between the BDP
core and the center of the VHF unit as obtained for the
ground-state geometry optimized by semiempirical AM1
calculations. Moreover, the absence of solvatokinetic behav-
ior of 1b, that is, that the quenching process is not significantly
accelerated upon increasing the polarity of the solvent, led us
to assume that photoinduced electron transfer (PET) plays a
negligible role here. Control experiments with 2, where the
DHA/VHF moiety has been replaced with a nonswitchable
dihydro-VHF group that isolates the p-dicyanovinylbiphenyl
from the cycloheptatrienyl fragment (Scheme 1c), support
these findings. The spectral characteristics of the BDP
fluorophore in 2 are very similar to those of 1a/1b
(Table 2). Furthermore, the fluorescence of 2 in nonpolar
solvents is as bright as that of 1a. Upon increasing solvent
polarity, a slight quenching of the BDP emission in 2 is
observed. The latter is apparently connected to the moderate
PETactivity of the para-cyanovinylbiphenyl group,[12] empha-
sizing the fact that the entire VHF unit is mandatory for the
performance of 1b. As expected, after the photoreaction to
1b, the latter remains ECL-silent, and 1b thus represents the
OFF state of the system.
In conclusion, we have presented a photochromic pair of
BDP-DHA/VHF dyads as a versatile all-optically control-
lable switch, for which irradiation with near-UV light serves
as the input and luminescence at 540 nm as the output.
Furthermore, the readout signal of the ON state 1a can be
generated by conventional photoexcitation as well as electro-
chemically; in other words, the system shows photogated
electrochemiluminescence. Light-induced conversion of 1a to
1b is accompanied by a 50-fold decrease of luminescence,
defining the system as a true ON/OFF photoswitch. We have
demonstrated here that the outstanding photo- and electro-
chemical properties of both modules, DHA/VHF and BDP,
can be combined synergistically for highly interesting all-
optical photochromic molecular switches. The ECL findings
also indicate potential applications in gated organic light-
emitting diodes (OLEDs).[13]
Received: May 9, 2005
Published online: October 10, 2005
Keywords: boron dipyrromethene · electrochemiluminescence ·
.
fluorescence · molecular switches · photochromism
[1] a) M. A. van der Horst, K. J. Hellingwerf, Acc. Chem. Res. 2004,
37, 13 – 20; b) F. M. Raymo, Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 401 – 414; c) J.-
M. Lehn, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4763 – 4768;
d) A. P. de Silva, N. D. McClenaghan, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10,
574 – 586.
[2] a) R. R. Rando, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1881 – 1896; b) W. R.
Briggs, E. Huala, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 1999, 15, 33 – 62;
c) A. R. Cashmore, J. A. Jarillo, Y. L. Wu, D. M. Liu, Science
1999, 284, 760 – 765; d) Y. Han, S. Braatsch, L. Osterloh, G. Klug,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 12306 – 12311.
[3] a) M. Irie, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1683; b) J.-M. Lehn, Supra-
molecular Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1995, pp. 124 – 138; c) J.
Daub, J. Salbeck, T. Knöchel, C. Fischer, H. Kunkely, K. M.
Rapp, Angew. Chem. 1989, 101, 1541 – 1542; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. Engl. 1989, 28, 1494 – 1496.
[11] If no other deactivation processes are present, kFRET can be also
expressed as kFRET = (1/tDA)ꢀ(1/tD) with tDA being the fluores-
cence lifetime of the FRET ensemble. By combining the
equations in refs.[10] and [11] one may calculate a value for r.
ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6943 –6947