J. M. D. Storey, M. M. Ladwa / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 381–383
383
Me
N
cient route to synthesise 5-azaoxindoles and spirocyclic
5-azaoxindoles. Clearly, the main limitation to this
method is the instability of the a-bromoamide cyclisa-
tion precursors making this method poor when second-
ary a-bromoamides are involved, and inappropriate
when primary a-bromoamides are involved.
Me
N
Me
N
O
i
O
O
n
N
N
Br
N
n
n
5a. n = 1
5b. n = 2
5c. n = 3
5d. n = 4
6a. n = 1
6b. n = 2
6c. n = 3
6d. n = 4
7a. n = 1
7b. n = 2
7c. n = 3
7d. n = 4
Acknowledgements
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) Bu3SnH, AIBN, toluene,
110 °C.
We gratefully thank Kingston University and The Uni-
versity of Aberdeen for financial support for M.M.L. In
addition, we would like to thank Dr Steve Hilton for
helpful discussions and the EPSRC National Mass Spec-
troscopy Centre at the University of Wales, Swansea for
providing accurate mass measurements.
phosphorus. Each was purified by fractional distillation
prior to coupling with 1 under the conditions previously
adumbrated to give the cyclisation precursors 5b–d in
86%, 85% and 81% yields, respectively. For the prepara-
tion of 5a, 1-bromocyclopropanecarbonyl chloride was
synthesised by intramolecular cyclisation of 2,4-bromo-
butanoate in the presence of tetrabutylammonium
hydrogen sulfate and potassium carbonate in toluene,
to give the monobromoester. This was then treated with
6 M HCl to furnish the bromoacid, followed by conver-
sion to the acid chloride by treatment with thionyl chlo-
ride giving 1-bromocyclopropanecarbonyl chloride in
56% yield.12 This was then coupled with 1 to give 5a
in 83% yield.
References and notes
1. Recent examples include: McLoughlin, P. T. F.; Clyne, M.
A.; Aldabbagh, F. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8065–8071;
´
Nu´nez, A.; Sanchez, A.; Burgos, C.; Alvarez-Builla, J.
˜
Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6217–6224.
2. Recent leading references include: Review: Studer, A.;
Bossart, M. In Organic Synthesis; Renaud, P., Sibi, M. P.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 2, p 62; Bowman,
W. R.; Cloonan, M. O.; Fletcher, A. J.; Stein, T.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1460–1467; Allin, S. M.;
Barton, W. R. S.; Bowman, W. R.; McInally, T. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2002, 41, 4191–4193; Escolano, C.; Jones, K.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1453–1464; Bowman, W. R.; Mann,
E.; Parr, J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2991–
2999; Harrowven, D. C.; Sutton, B. J.; Coulton, S.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 3387–3400; Flannagan, S. R.;
Harrowven, D. C.; Bradley, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 1795–1798.
The cyclisation of substrates 5a–d (Scheme 3) afforded a
range of spiro azaoxindoles in reasonable yields (entries
8–11). With the exception of the cyclisation of 5a it
would appear that the size of the spirocyclic ring has lit-
tle effect on the selectivity between cyclisation and direct
reduction with TBTH. Interestingly, the cyclisation of
5a gave significantly less cyclisation product than the
other cases investigated even though the reactivity of a
cyclopropyl radical has been shown to be similar to a
vinyl radical. This is about one order of magnitude less
reactive than a phenyl radical, but considerably more
reactive than an alkyl radical in addition reactions to
b-methylstyrene, styrene and benzene.13 These are all
of course electron-rich aromatic systems compared to
pyridine. Of the four tertiary radicals being considered
in this series, the cyclopropyl radical resulting from 5a
is the least nucleophilic14 and consequently the rate of
cyclisation of this radical would be expected to be the
slowest of those investigated with the electron-poor
pyridine ring system.
3. Beckwith, A. L. J.; Storey, J. M. D. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1995, 977–978.
4. Beckwith, A. L. J.; Bowry, V. W.; Bowman, W. R.; Mann,
E.; Parr, J.; Storey, J. M. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 95–98.
5. Murphy, J. A.; Sherburn, M. S. Tetrahedron 1991, 47,
4077–4088.
´
6. Bacque, E.; El Qacemi, M.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2004, 21,
3671–3674.
7. Wood, E. R.; Kuyper, L.; Petrov, K. G.; Hunter, R. N.;
Harris, P. A.; Lackey, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004,
14, 953–957.
8. Tagliabue, E.; Castiglioni, F.; Ghirelli, C.; Modugno, M.;
Asnaghi, L.; Somenzi, G.; Melani, C.; Menard, S. J. Biol.
Chem. 2000, 275, 5388–5394.
As all the reactions were conducted under essentially
identical conditions, the ratio of cyclised to reduced
products for each substrate provides an approximate
value for kc/kH, where kc is the rate constant for the
rate-determining step of cyclisation, and kH is the rate
constant for hydrogen atom transfer from the TBTH
to the uncylised radical. Knowing the rate of the bimole-
cular hydrogen atom transfer process, a rate for cyclisa-
tion into the pyridine ring can be calculated. This work
is ongoing in our laboratories.
9. Smith, K.; El-Hiti, G. A.; Pritchard, G. J.; Hamilton, A.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 2299–2303.
´
10. Mazeas, D.; Guillaumet, G.; Viaud, M. C. Heterocycles
1999, 50, 1065–1080; Robinson, R. P.; Donahue, K. M.
J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4805–4806.
11. Kemal, O.; Reese, C. B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1981, 1569–1573.
12. Hoffmann, H. M. R.; Eggert, U.; Walenta, A.; Weineck,
E.; Schomburg, D.; Wartchow, R.; Allen, F. H. J. Org.
Chem. 1989, 54, 6096–6100.
13. Johnston, L. J.; Scaiano, J. C.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 4877–4881.
14. Walborsky, H. M. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 1625–1651.
In general, we have demonstrated the feasibility of using
homolytic aromatic substitution onto pyridine as an effi-