purple; pink solution in Et2O). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
dH(ppm): 128.26 (2H), 83.28 (2H), 12.53 (2H), 10.02 (2H), 7.69
(2H), 6.96 (2H), 6.47 (2H), 5.12 (2H), −0.08 (1H), −60.22
(2H), −63.42 (2H). 19F-NMR (400 MHz, C6D6) dF(ppm): −93.2
(brs, 2F), −110.8 (brs, 2F), −150.78 (s, 2F), −156.05 (s, 2F),
−157.67 (s, 2F). UV-Vis. (CH2Cl2) k (Abs.) 10−3 × e (M−1 cm−1):
328 (10.7), 360 (11.4), 410 (19.3), 552 (5.5), 626 (1.4 sh),
754 (1.6) nm. MS (ESI+, m/z) = 958.3 [M]+, HR-MS (ESI+,
m/z) = 958.1078 (Calcd for C48H22F10FeN7O). Anal. Calcd for
C48H22F10FeN7O·H2O·3EtOH: C, 58.18; H, 3.80; N, 8.79; Cl,
0.00; Found: C, 58.56; H, 3.41; N, 8.23; Cl, 0.40. TLC (silica,
Et2O 100% vol.) Rf 0.72.
and Pt ring (Pine Instruments, N0 = 22.5%, r10 = 2.5 mm,
r20 = 3.75 mm, and r30 = 4.25 mm). The collection efficiency
of the Pt ring towards H2O2 was determined as a function of
the rotation speed13 by carrying out the O2 reduction at a bare
EPG disk of the EPG-disk/Pt-ring rotating electrode. A BAS CV-
50 W potentiostat (Bioanalytical Systems) and a Pine AFCBP1
bipotentiostat (Pine Instruments) with an ASR speed controller
(Pine Instruments) were used for rotating disk and ring-disk
experiments, respectively. The auxiliary electrode was a Pt mesh
and the reference electrode was a low flow rate saturated calomel
electrode. All potentials are given with respect to the normal
hydrogen electrode (ESCE = 0.243 V vs. NHE).
The Pt ring was cleaned with 0.05 micron c-alumina paste for
1 min followed by sonication in methanol. The EPG disk was
cleaned with a 600 grit SiC paper and sonicated for 1 min in
methanol immediately prior to depositing a catalytic film. The
catalysts were deposited on the electrode surface by syringing
a 0.6–2.0 lL aliquot of a fresh 0.25–0.5 mM solution in a
dimethoxyethane/water mixture (5.6 : 1 vol.) or acetone on a
vertically positioned rotating electrode (300 rpm). The stability
of the catalysts was verified in every experiment by measuring
the voltammetric response at 200 rpm before and after the set of
catalytic waves at different rotations was collected. The limiting
current value varied by only 2–4%. The presented data are
representative of at least 10 separate measurements. Measurements
were conducted at ambient temperature, 22 2 ◦C, in N2 deaerated
solutions when necessary.
5,15-Bis(pentafluorophenyl)-10-(2-3-(1-imidazolylmethyl)-benza-
midophenyl)-corrole cobalt(III) [Co(mapc-t)] (6). Corrole
6
was prepared from the adaptation of a reported method12c by
dissolving H3(mapc-t) (22.6 mg, 25 lmol), Co(OAc)2·4H2O
(30 mg, 120 lmol) and NaOAc (30 mg, 366 lmol) in ethanol
(10 mL) and stirring the resulting solution for 2 h at 25 ◦C. After
evaporation of the solvent, the residue was subjected to
chromatography (SiO2, 17 × 2 cm, loading CH2Cl2, eluent
CH2Cl2). 6 was obtained in 78.8% yield (19 mg, dark brown;
brown solution in CH2Cl2). Limited amount of dimer was
1
obtained. H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) dH(ppm): 9.02 (d, 2H,
J = 4.4 Hz), 8.95 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 8.37 (d, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz),
8.18 (d, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 8.12 (d, 2H, J = 4.4 Hz), 7.95 (d, 1H,
J = 6.0 Hz), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.86 (s, 1H), 7.77 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz),
7.40 (t, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 7.19 (t, 1H, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1H,
J = 5.6 Hz), 5.02 (s, 1H), 4.06 (s, 1H), 3.89 (s, 2H), 3.28 (s, 1H),
2.58 (s, 1H). 19F-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) dF(ppm): −137.52
(dd, J = 25.2 Hz, J = 7.6 Hz, 2F), −139.45 (dd, J = 26.0 Hz,
J = 7.6 Hz, 2F), −153.62 (t, J = 19.6 Hz, 2F), −161.35 (dt, J =
25.2 Hz, 2F), −162.26 (dt, J = 26.0 Hz, 2F). 13C-NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3) dC(ppm): 163.25, 150.14, 147.26, 145.97, 144.89, 143.00,
138.62, 136.81, 135.57, 135.47, 135.23, 132.64, 130.98, 130.53,
129.66, 129.62, 129.14, 128.57, 128.31, 127.91, 127.57, 125.83,
123.75, 121.98, 120.74, 120.41, 119.58, 118.71, 116.95, 106.80,
50.17, 29.93. UV-Vis. (CH2Cl2) k (Abs.) 10−3 × e (M−1 cm−1): 380
(47.7), 412 (26.2), 546 (7.4), 586 (4.3), 604 (4.2) nm. MS (ESI+,
m/z) = 961.5 [M]+, HR-MS (ESI+, m/z) = 961.1091, MS (ESI−,
m/z) = 960.5 [M − H]− (Calcd for C48H22CoF10N7O). TLC (silica,
CH2Cl2 100% vol.) Rf 0.53 (silica, hexane/ethyl acetate 1 : 1 vol.)
Rf 0.70.
Kinetic analysis
The following simplified general scheme of O2 reduction was used
to analyse the data:
O2 is cathodically reduced either to H2O (with the constant k1)
or to H2O2 (k2). The resulting H2O2 can be further reduced to
H2O (k3), catalytically decomposed on the electrode surface (k4),
or removed into the bulk of the solution.
For such a scheme, the expressions for distinguishing between
various reaction paths from the disk (Id) and ring (Ir) currents
were developed by Bagotskii:14
Materials
NId
Ir
2k1
k2
(k3 + k4) (1 + 2k1/k2) + k3
= 1 +
+
x−1/2
(1)
KNO3 (≥ 99%, Acros) was recrystallized. NaCN (≥ 95%, Baker &
Adamson) was used as supplied. WARNING: Cyanide is highly
toxic, the experiments must be performed in a properly ventilated
area. All discarded electrolytes were neutralized with bleach before
disposal. The buffers employed were (0.1 M): KC8H5O4, pH = 4;
KH2PO4, pH = 4.4; Na2HPO4/KH2PO4, pH = 5.1, 6.2, 7, 8;
Na2CO3/NaHCO3, pH = 9; Na3PO4/NaHCO3, pH = 10, 11.
ZH
O
2
2
N(I1 − Id )
2ZO k3 + k4
2ZO
k2
2
= 1 +
+
2 x1/2
(2)
Ir
ZH
k2
O
2
2
where Id and Ir (A) are the disk and the ring currents, Il (A) is the
limiting diffusion current, N is the collection efficiency of the ring
electrode, Zi = 0.62Di2/3v−1/6, D (cm2 s−1) is a diffusion coefficient,
v (cm2 s−1) is the kinematic viscosity of the solution, x (rad s−1)
is the speed of electrode rotation, ki (cm s−1) are the first-order
heterogeneous rate constants for individual paths of O2 reduction.
The values of the parameters are: D = 1.71 × 10−5 (H2O2) and
2.1 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 (O2), v = 0.01 cm2 s−1, [O2] = 0.24 mM, Il =
84 lA for a 4e− process.
Procedures and instrumentation
Experiments were carried out in a one compartment home-made
glass cell (100 mL) with a tightly fitting lid using an edge plane
graphite (EPG) rotating disk working electrode (Pine Instruments,
0.195 cm2) or a ring-disk electrode with a removable EPG disk
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006
Dalton Trans., 2006, 554–559 | 555
©