Communications
4901; g) B. Grant, C. Djerassi, J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 968 – 970;
h) S. E. Denmark, T. K. Jones, J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4595 –
4597; i) K. Kakinuma, T. Matsuzawa, T. Eguchi, Tetrahedron
1991, 47, 6975 – 6982; j) B. Caro, M.-C. SØnØchal-Tocquer, F. R.-
L. Guen, P. LePoul, J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 585, 43 – 52; k) K.
Ohmori, T. Suzuki, K. Taya, D. Tanabe, T. Ohta, K. Suzuki, Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 1057 – 1060; l) T. Suzuki, K. Ohmori, K. Suzuki,
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1741 – 1744; m) K. Ohmori, Y. Hachisu, T.
Suzuki, K. Suzuki, Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1031 – 1034.
[4] K. Tomooka, M. Kikuchi, K. Igawa, M. Suzuki, P.-H. Keong, T.
Nakai, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 4676 – 4679; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2000, 39, 4502 – 4505.
[5] It is well known that hydroalumination of a propargylic alcohol
system proceeds significantly faster than that of a homopropar-
gylic alcohol system; a) S. Ma, F. Liu, E. Negishi, Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 3829 – 3832; b) B. Crousse, M. Alami, G.
Linstrumelle, Synlett 1997, 992 – 994.
Finally, we examined expansion of this methodology to a
carbon–carbon bond-forming reaction, that is, carbolithiation
of propargylic alcohol.[16] The reaction of alcohol 7c with
nBuLi in the presence of N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenedi-
amine (TMEDA) gave allylic alcohol 19, with a trisubstituted
alkene moiety, in 80% yield with excellent group selectivity.
The stereochemistry of the resulting alkene was determined
as the E configuration by transformation to the g-lactone 20
through CO2 trapping of vinyl lithium [Eq. (6)].
[6] The difference in bulkiness between TMS and TBDPS plays an
important role in the diastereoselectivity of the [1,2]-Wittig
À
rearrangement which forms a C C bond between C4 and C5; see
ref. [4].
[7] Quite recently, Suzukiꢀs group has developed a chelation-
controlled diastereoselective hydroalumination in a 1,1-bis-
(alkynyl) alcohol system. They performed stereoselective con-
struction of continuous pseudoquaternary chiral centers by using
this method; see ref. [3k–m].
[8] The produced alcohols (that is, 4 and 5) were easily distinguished
1
by H and 13C NMR analysis after selective desilylation at the
alkyne terminal.
[9] It has been reported that a phenyl substituent increases the
electrophilicity of alkynes. For example, Slaughꢀs group reported
that the reaction of diphenylacetylene with LiAlH4 proceeds
markedly faster than the same reaction of dialkylacetylene: E. F.
Magoon, L. H. Slaugh, Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 4509 – 4515.
In summary, we have described a remarkable acceleration
effect of phenyl-substituted silyl groups in hydroalumination
and carbolithiation reactions of propargylic alcohols. These
results clearly show that an arylsilyl group can act not only as
a protecting group but also as an activating group of the
alkynyl moiety. This work provides an efficient group-
selective approach to multifunctionalized alkenes. Further
work is underway in our group to expand the utility of this
interesting phenomenon.
À
[10] Hyperconjugative interaction between the Si C s* orbitals and
the p* orbitals of the phenyl and alkynyl moieties was observed
by electron transmission spectroscopy in trimethylsilylbenzene
and trimethylsilylacetylene: a) A. Modelli, D. Jones, G. Diste-
fano, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 86, 434 – 437; b) J. C. Giordan, J. H.
Moore, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6541 – 6544; c) J. C.
Giordan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6544 – 6546.
[11] It has been reported that hydroalumination of alkynes with an
ate-complex aluminum reagent is strongly dependent on the
electrophilicity of the alkyne. Kakinuma, Matsuzawa, and
Eguchi discussed the relationship between the LUMO level of
the alkyne and the reactivity of the propargylic alcohols in
hydroalumination with LiAlH4; see ref. [3i].
Received: September 7, 2005
Published online: November 28, 2005
Keywords: alkenes · carbolithiation · hydroalumination ·
.
hyperconjugation · substituent effects
[12] These calculations were performed at the B3LYP/6À31 + G(d)//
B3LYP/6À31G(d) level with Gaussian 98.
[13] For more detailed discussion, calculation of a transition-state
model is needed.
[1] For leading reviews of hydrometalation, see: a) J. A. Labinger in
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 8 (Eds.: B. M. Trost, I.
Fleming), Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, pp. 667 – 702; b) N. Asao, Y.
Yamamoto, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2000, 73, 1071 – 1087.
[2] For reviews of hydroalumination, see: a) G. Zweifel, J. A. Miller
in Organic Reactions, Vol. 32 (Ed.: W. G. Dauben), Wiley, New
York, 1984, pp. 375 – 517; b) J. J. Eisch in Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis, Vol. 8 (Eds.: B. M. Trost, I. Fleming),
Pergamon, Oxford, 1991, pp. 733 – 761.
[3] For representative studies on hydroalumination of propargylic
alcohols, see: a) J. D. Chanley, H. Sobotka, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1949, 71, 4140 – 4141; b) E. B. Bates, E. R. H. Jones, M. C.
Whiting, J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 1854 – 1860; c) B. Franzus, E. I.
Snyder, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 3423 – 3429; d) E. I. Snyder,
J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 3531 – 3534; e) E. J. Corey, J. A.
Katzenellenbogen, G. H. Posner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
4245 – 4247; f) W. T. Borden, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 4898 –
[14] We have found that measurement of the Dd value of the ethyne
carbon atoms (db-carbonÀdg-carbon) in 13C NMR analysis can predict
the reactivity of silyl-substituted propargylic alcohols. Actually,
the Dd value of 10 was higher than that of the less reactive one
(10: 22.4; 11: 21.8; 12: 13.1), which means that the Dd value
shows a polarization of the ethyne carbon atoms and electro-
deficiency on the b-carbon atom.
[15] Recently, Gevorgyanꢀs group reported that regiochemistry of the
palladium-catalyzed hydrostannation is predictable from the Dd
value of the ethyne carbon atoms in a diarylacetylene system; M.
Rubin, A. Trofimov, V. Gevorgyan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
10243 – 10249.
[16] Carbolithiation of propargylic alcohols has been reported in only
a few cases of highly activated alkynyl systems. For the reaction
of g-phenylpropargyl alcohol, see: L.-I. Olsson, A. Claesson,
Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 2161 – 2162.
234
ꢀ 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 232 –234