Palladium-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of heterocyclic silanolates with substituted aryl iodides and bromides

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/ol053165r

Sodium silanolates derived from a number of heterocyclic silanols undergo cross-coupling with a variety of aromatic iodides and bromides under mild conditions. In situ deprotonation of the silanols with an equivalent amount of sodium hydride in toluene ge

Full text of DOI:10.1021/ol053165r

ORGANIC
LETTERS
2006
Vol. 8, No. 4
793-795
Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions of Heterocyclic Silanolates
with Substituted Aryl Iodides and
Bromides
Scott E. Denmark* and John D. Baird
Roger Adams Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Illinois,
Urbana, Illinois 61801
denmark@scs.uiuc.edu.
Received December 30, 2005
ABSTRACT
Sodium silanolates derived from a number of heterocyclic silanols undergo cross-coupling with a variety of aromatic iodides and bromides
under mild conditions. In situ deprotonation of the silanols with an equivalent amount of sodium hydride in toluene generates the sodium salt
that couples with iodides under the action of Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 in good yield at room temperature to 50 °C. The aromatic bromides also couple
with these salts under the action of the Pd(I) catalyst 12.
The Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of organometallic donors
including organostannane,1 -borane,2 and -zinc3 reagents is
among the most important modern synthetic methods for the
formation of carbon-carbon bonds.4 In recent years, we have
developed organosilanols as a new class of donors for a
myriad of cross-coupling processes.5 In addition to the many
advantages of organosilanols, we have demonstrated two
mechanistically distinct modes of activation: the classic
fluoride-induced couplings6a and the couplings promoted by
various Bronsted bases (KOSiMe3, Cs2CO3, NaOtBu, NaH).6b
The unique advantages of the latter mode are the avoidance
of corrosive fluoride sources which are incompatible with
silicon protecting groups. More importantly, fluoride-
activated coupling is often plagued by protiodemetalation
which is a particularly difficult problem for electron-rich
heterocyclic coupling partners.
Heterocyclic compounds are of prime importance in
pharmaceutical, natural products, and materials chemistry.
Unfortunately, the cross-coupling of heterocyclic donors is
of only limited utility for many classes of heterocyclic
systems.7 The cross-coupling of electron-rich heterocyclic
stannanes typically requires rather forcing conditions, and
their inherent toxicity poses a serious drawback.8 Although
(1) Mitchell, T. N. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; de
Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004;
Vol. 1, Chapter 3.
(2) (a) Miyaura, N. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; de
Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004;
Vol. 1, Chapter 2. (b) Suzuki, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147-
168. (c) Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457-2483.
(3) Knochel, P.; Calaza, M. I.; Hupe, E. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
Coupling Reactions; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Vol. 2, Chapter 11.
(4) Echavarren, A. M.; Cardenas, D. J. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
Coupling Reactions; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, Germany, 2004; Vol. 1, Chapter 1.
(5) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions; de Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2004; Vol. 1, Chapter 4. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Ober, M. H.
Aldrichimica Acta 2003, 36, 75-85. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 835-846. (d) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6439-6440.
(6) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F.; Wehrli, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 4865-4875. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Sweis, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 4876-4882.
(7) The parent indole can be used to prepare 2- or 3-substituted indoles.
Lane, B. S.; Brown, M. A.; Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8050-
8057.
10.1021/ol053165r CCC: $33.50
© 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/24/2006

the cross-coupling of arylboronic acids has enjoyed great
success, many heterocyclic boronic acids remain problematic
as they are unstable to long-term storage and suffer rapid
protiodeborylation under reaction conditions.9 We have
recently reported the cross-coupling of N-Boc(2-indolyl)-
dimethylsilanol (1) with aryl iodides under mild conditions
in good yields.10a The silanol is a robust, shelf-stable reagent
that is ideally suited for the synthesis of 2-substituted indoles.
In our hands, the corresponding boronic acid decomposed
within days.
method was compatible with aryl iodides bearing nitrile
groups, which were previously problematic when using
NaOtBu, to furnish 3c in 81% yield (entry 3).10a
A series of electron-rich heterocyclic 2-silanols were
prepared including pyrrolyl (4), thienyl (5), and furyl (6).11
These silanols were all easily obtained by metalation and
trapping with either hexamethylcyclotrisiloxane or trapping
with dimethyldichlorosilane followed by aqueous hydrolysis.
The N-Boc (2-pyrrolyl)dimethylsilanol 4 was chosen for ease
of removal of the Boc protecting group.12,13
The original procedure for the cross-coupling of 1 with
iodides required the use of CuI (1.0 equiv) and NaOtBu (2
equiv) along with Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 (5 mol %).10a Under
Bronsted base activation, we propose that the cross-coupling
proceeds through a key silicon-oxygen-palladium inter-
mediate prior to the transmetalation step.6b The activator
serves to generate a metal silanolate which then forms a
palladium-silanolate complex. The role of CuI in the
reaction remains unclear. We hypothesized that if the sodium
silanolate was generated by deprotonation with NaH the
requisite sodium silanolate would be formed quantitatively
without a conjugate acid in the medium.
We were delighted to find that the sodium silanolates
generated in situ from NaH were active in the cross-coupling
reaction and that these reactions proceeded smoothly in the
absence of CuI. In the cross-coupling of 4-iodoanisole (2a),
the previous conditions required heating the reaction at 50
°C for 24 h to furnish the product in 72% yield. Using the
in situ formed silanolate, this product is generated in a
comparable 68% yield in just 3 h at 80 °C without CuI (Table
1, entry 1).
Following the conditions outlined above, 4 coupled
smoothly with ethyl 4-iodobenzoate (2b) and 2-iodotoluene
(2d) but required mild heating to effect the cross-coupling
of 2a (Table 2, entries 1-3). Other in situ generated
heterocyclic silanolates were also tested. For example, Na+5-
provided the desired cross-coupling products from 2b and
2d in 3 h at room temperature; however, 2a required heating
to effect complete conversion (entry 4). Furylsilanol 6
exhibited enhanced reactivity with 2b, furnishing the desired
product in 1 h in 82% yield. Tolyl derivate 2d reacted with
Na+6- in a manner similar to that of Na+4- and afforded
9d in 61% yield in 3 h. Surprisingly, the cross-coupling of
2a with Na+6- proved challenging and required a catalytic
amount of (2-furyl)3As to reach completion (entry 7).
Table 2. Cross-Coupling of Heterocyclic Silanols with Aryl
Iodides
Table 1. Formation of Sodium Silanolate Na+1- in Situ and
Cross-Coupling with Aryl Iodides
entry
X
R
temp, °C time, h product yield,a %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7b
8
9
N-Boc 4-OMe
N-Boc 4-CO2Et
N-Boc 2-Me
50
rt
rt
80
rt
rt
50
rt
rt
36
3
3
24
3
3
24
1
3
7a
7b
7d
8a
8b
8d
9a
9b
9d
72
76
80
72
78
79
71
82
61
S
S
S
4-OMe
4-CO2Et
2-Me
entry
R
temp, °C
time, h
product
yield,a %
O
O
O
4-OMe
4-CO2Et
2-Me
1
2
3
4-OMe
4-CO2Et
4-CN
80
rt
rt
3
3
3
3a
3b
3c
68
82
81
a Yield of chromatographed products purified by recrystallization or
sublimation. b Required the use of 0.2 equiv of (2-furyl)3As for complete
conversion.
a Yield of chromatographed, recrystallized products.
Because NaOtBu can induce transesterification, we sur-
mised that the milder silanolate base would be compatible
with ester groups. Indeed, the in situ prepared Na+1- afforded
smooth conversion to the desired product 3b in 82% yield
in 3 h at room temperature (entry 2). Further, the in situ
The positive results with aryl iodides encouraged us to
investigate the cross-coupling of aryl bromides with in situ
(11) The synthesis of 2-substituted thiophenes can be achieved from
silanes. Nakao, Y.; Imanaka, H.; Sahoo, A. K.; Yada, A.; Hiyama, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6952-6953.
(12) The corresponding N-Boc(2-pyrrolyl)boronic acid is a poor substrate
for cross-coupling reactions as it suffers from rapid protiodeborylation and
also undergoes a competing homodimerization. Johnson, C. N.; Stemp, G.;
Anand, N.; Stephen, S. C.; Gallagher, T. Synlett 1998, 1025-1027.
(13) Cross-coupling reactions of 2-thienyl- and 2-furylboronic acids
typically employ 2.0 equiv of the boronic acids. Kondolff, I.; Doucet, H.;
Santelli, M. Synlett 2005, 2057-2061.
(8) (a) Labadie, S. S.; Teng, E. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4250. (b) Kang,
S.; Baik, T.; Song, S. Synlett 1999, 327-329.
(9) Tyrrell, E.; Brookes, P. Synthesis 2004, 469-483.
(10) Denmark, S. E.; Baird, J. D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3649-3652. See
also: (b) Denmark, S. E.; Kallemeyn, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2839-
2842.
794
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006

generated sodium silanolates. For optimization studies, we
chose Na+5- and 4-bromoanisole (10a) as the electrophile.
Initial conditions using Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 (5 mol %) were
unsuccessful, so we surveyed several Pd sources with 1,1-
di-tert-butylphosphinobiphenyl 11 at 50 °C which has been
successfully employed with aryl bromides in other cross-
coupling studies within our group.14
Disappointingly, PdCl2 and PdBr2 did not catalyze the
cross-coupling of 6 with 10a in the presence of 11 (Table 3,
entries 1-3). The use of an allylpalladium chloride dimer
in conjunction with 11 brought about complete conversion
in 3 h, although the desired arene 8a was accompanied with
11% of the homocoupling product (entry 4). The Pd(I)
catalyst 12, which has been shown to be a highly active Pd
source for the cross-coupling of arylboronic acids, afforded
clean conversion to 8a within 3 h without the formation of
the homocoupling side product (entry 5).15 Furthermore, the
loading of 12 can be decreased to 2.5 mol % with no loss in
activity.
a hexane solution of 1 to a stirred suspension of 1.0 equiv
of NaH in toluene afforded a white precipitate whose identity
was confirmed by NMR and HRMS as Na+1-. The salt was
a stable, free-flowing white powder. We were pleased to find
that this reagent possessed reactivity similar to that for the
in situ prepared silanolate in reaction with 2b and Pd2(dba)3‚
CHCl3 to afford 3b in 76% yield. The other silanolates,
Na+5- and Na+6-, were prepared analogously but were
formed as stable waxes which were nonetheless still easily
manipulated. The cross-coupling of Na+5- and Na+6- with
2b and Pd2(dba)3‚CHCl3 gave the desired products in 87%
and 79% yields, respectively. Storing the active silicon
species as the sodium salt provides two advantages. First,
the reaction procedure is simplified by only having to charge
the active silanolate into the reaction vessel instead of adding
both the silanol and the activator. Second, the dimerization
of silanols to their corresponding disiloxanes17 is prevented
by storing the sodium salts.
Table 4. Cross-Coupling of Silanolates with Substituted Aryl
Bromides
Table 3. Catalyst and Ligand Optimization for the
Cross-Coupling of Aryl Bromide 10a with Na+5-
entry
X
R
time, h
product
yield,a %
1
2
3
4
5
6
7c
8
S
S
S
S
S
4-OMe
4-CO2Et
4-CN
2-Me
4-CF3
b
3
3
3
3
3
7
6
3
3
3
3
6
8a
8b
8c
8d
8e
8f
9a
9b
9c
9d
9e
9f
71
67
78
77
86
74
66
60
73
71
71
69
entry
Pd source
PdCl2
PdBr2
PdBr2
[allylPdCl]2
Pd(I) catalyst
ligand,a mol % time, h conversion, %b
1
2
3
4
5
10
10
20
20
0
12
12
24
3
trace
4
trace
100c
100
S
3
O
O
O
O
O
O
4-OMe
4-CO2Et
4-CN
2-Me
4-CF3
b
a Employed 1,1-di-tert-butylphosphinobiphenyl as an additive. b Area %
by GC analysis. c Accompanied with 11% of the product of aryl bromide
9
1
homocoupling, as determined by H NMR analysis.
10
11
12
The cross-coupling of Na+5- and Na+6- proceeded
smoothly with a range of aryl bromides providing the desired
products in moderate to good yields (Table 4). Most reactions
were complete within 3 h, although the cross-coupling of
1-bromonaphthalene was slower requiring 7 and 6 h to reach
completion for Na+5- and Na+6-, respectively. However,
the cross-coupling of Na+6- with 10a stalled at 78%
conversion to give the product in 66% yield (entry 7).16
To corroborate our hypothesis that the sodium silanolate
is the active silicon intermediate, we prepared Na+1- and
tested its competence under the reaction conditions. Adding
a Yield of chromatographed products purified by sublimation. b 1-
Bromonaphthalene. c Reaction stalled at 78% conversion.
In conclusion, we have developed a simplified and general
procedure for the cross-coupling of in situ generated and
isolated heterocyclic silanolates with aryl iodides and
bromides. Extension to more complex heterocycles is in
progress.
Acknowledgment. We are appreciative for generous
financial support from the National Institutes of Health
(R01GM61738). J. D. B. acknowledges the University of
Illinois for a graduate fellowship.
Supporting Information Available: Preparation of Na+1-
and all sodium silanolates, detailed experimental procedures,
and full characterization of all products. This material is
available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
(14) Wolfe, J. P.; Singer, R. A.; Yang, B. H.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 9550-9561.
(15) (a) Weissman, H.; Ray, C. R.; Elliott, E. L.; Moore, J. S. AdV. Synth.
Catal., submitted for publication. (b) Weissman, H.; Shimon, L. J.; Milstein,
D. Organometallics 2004, 23, 3931-3940.
(16) The cross-coupling of the N-Boc-(2-indolyl)- and (2-pyrrolyl)-
dimethylsilanols with arylbromides was unsuccessful. Significant amounts
of phenol were observed when the reactions were run at 80 °C. We believe
the phenol is derived from a competing reductive elimination to form a
dimethylsilyl ether that is hydrolyzed upon aqueous workup.
OL053165R
(17) Lickiss, P. D. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 42 147-262.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 4, 2006
795