Published on Web 02/08/2006
Metallophosphite-Catalyzed Asymmetric Acylation of
r,â-Unsaturated Amides
Mary R. Nahm, Justin R. Potnick, Peter S. White, and Jeffrey S. Johnson*
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3290
Received September 1, 2005; E-mail: jsj@unc.edu
Abstract: The l-menthone-derived TADDOL phosphite 6b catalyzes highly enantioselective conjugate
additions of acyl silanes to R,â-unsaturated amides. p-Methoxybenzoyl cyclohexyldimethylsilane adds to a
variety of N,N-dimethyl acrylamide derivatives in the presence of the lithium salt of 6b. In many instances
the R-silyl-γ-ketoamide product undergoes facile enantioenrichment (to 97-99% ee) upon recrystallization.
Desilylation with HF‚pyr affords the formal Stetter addition products. Baeyer-Villiger oxidation of the
desilylated γ-ketoamides affords useful ester products. An X-ray diffraction study of 6b reveals that the
isopropyl group of the menthone ketal influences the position of the syn-pseudoaxial phenyl group in the
TADDOL structure. Through a crossover experiment, the silicon migration step in the reaction mechanism
is shown to be strictly intramolecular.
Introduction
In parallel with the development of aldehydes as acyl donors
for conjugate additions, acyl silanes have shown promise as
suitable pronucleophiles in conjugate addition reactions. As in
the classic Stetter reaction, cyanide and heterazolium carbenes
can trigger the needed umpolung reactivity: -CN-catalyzed
addition of acyl silanes to cyclic enones and acyclic acrylates
was demonstrated by Degl’Innocenti,14 while carbene catalysis
was shown by Scheidt to be effective for the acylation of R,â-
unsaturated esters and ketones.15,16 Since the initiating steps in
these catalytic processes involving acyl silanes are presumed
The conjugate addition of acyl anion equivalents to R,â-
unsaturated carbonyls is a useful and direct approach to the
synthesis of 1,4-dicarbonyl compounds that can simultaneously
introduce two new stereocenters.1 The prototypical catalytic
reaction type involves the use of cyanide or heterazolium
carbenes as umpolung catalysts.2-4 Employing scalemic versions
of the latter, the asymmetric intramolecular Stetter reaction was
recently realized as a useful transformation by Enders and co-
workers.5,6 The transformation has undergone some significant
improvements in enantioselectivity and scope in a body of work
by Rovis and co-workers that now stands as the benchmark in
this family of reactions.7-12 Their optimized process lends itself
to a number of R,â-unsaturated ester and ketone acceptors
delivering the annulated products in high yield and enantiose-
lectivity; however, extension to asymmetric intermolecular
alkene acylation has generally proven challenging. Enders was
the first, to our knowledge, to successfully investigate this
variant, achieving the addition of butanal to chalcone in 4-29%
yield and 30-39% enantiomeric excess;13 these results represent
the current state-of-the-art.
to be carbonyl addition and [1,2]-Brook rearrangement,17,18
a
pressing question related to catalysis was whether other entities
might trigger these events. Indeed, Reich and Takeda had
already shown that lithium phosphites add to acyl silanes and
cause silicon migration.19,20 The latter study was particularly
relevant since a pendant R,â-unsaturated ester was employed
to trap the nascent (siloxy)phosphonate anion.21 The work of
Reich and Takeda was instrumental to our development of chiral
metallophosphites as nucleophilic catalysts for aldehyde and
alkene acylation.22,23 We recently demonstrated a preliminary
asymmetric variant of the alkene acylation reaction that
proceeded in 67% yield and 50% enantiomeric excess using
(1) Stetter, H.; Kuhlmann, H. Org. React. (N. Y.) 1991, 40, 407-496.
(2) Seebach, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 239-258.
(3) Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1326-1328.
(4) For an exception using PBu3, see: Gong, J. H.; Im, Y. J.; Lee, K. Y.;
Kim, J. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1247-1251.
(13) Enders, D.; Balensiefer, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 534-541.
(14) Degl’Innocenti, A.; Ricci, A.; Mordini, A.; Reginato, G.; Colotta, V. Gazz.
Chim. Ital. 1987, 117, 645-648.
(15) Mattson, A. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 2314-2315.
(16) Bharadwaj, A. R.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2465-2468.
(17) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77-84.
(18) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065-2084.
(19) Reich, H. J.; Holtan, R. C.; Bolm, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 5609-
5617.
(20) Takeda, K.; Tanaka, T. Synlett 1999, 705-708.
(21) Koenigkramer, R. E.; Zimmer, H. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 3994-3998.
(22) Linghu, X.; Potnick, J. R.; Johnson, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
3070-3071.
(23) Nahm, M. R.; Linghu, X.; Potnick, J. R.; Yates, C. M.; White, P. S.;
Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2377-2379.
(5) Enders, D.; Breuer, K.; Runsink, J.; Teles, J. H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1996,
79, 1899-1902.
(6) Enders, D.; Breuer, K. In ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen,
E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: New York, 1999; Vol. 3,
pp 1093-1102.
(7) Kerr, M. S.; Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
10298-10299.
(8) Kerr, M. S.; Rovis, T. Synlett 2003, 1934-1936.
(9) Kerr, M. S.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8876-8877.
(10) Read de Alaniz, J.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6284-6289.
(11) Mennen, S. M.; Blank, J. T.; Tran-Dube, M. B.; Imbriglio, J. E.; Miller, S.
J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 195-197.
(12) Christmann, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2632-2634.
9
10.1021/ja056018x CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2006, 128, 2751-2756
2751