amine under relatively mild conditions. Unfortunately, side
reactions are quite common, including addition at the
4-position, counteranion (X-) addition at the 2- and 4-posi-
tion, and amination of the activating agent directly with the
amine nucleophile. Several clever solutions to these prob-
lematic side reactions appeared in the literature4a,c recently
that carefully modulate reaction conditions to minimize side
products. In these optimized cases, however, the amine
substrate scope is narrow, thus limiting broad applicability.
Table 1. Reaction Optimization for the Amination of
Pyridine-N-oxide with Cyclohexylaminea
entry
additive
base
solvent
temp (°C)
yield
We were interested in expanding and improving the
reactivity of amines with pyridine-N-oxides while minimizing
some of the more common side reactions. Since most of the
reaction side products were due to the activating agent, we
began our search for suitable alternatives. Phosphorus
oxychloride and related reagents, when combined with
pyridine-N-oxides, affect nonregioselective chlorination of
the 2- and 4-position in a manner similar to the activating
agents shown above.5 In these cases, the strength of
phosphorus-oxygen bond formation provides a strong
thermodynamic drive for reaction completion. We surmised
that we could take advantage of this same principle with
more specific phosphonium salts. Although most commonly
used as amide coupling reagents,6 phosphonium salts (Py-
BroP,7 BroP, PyBOP, and BOP)8 have also been shown to
activate carbon-oxygen bonds for nucleophilic displacement
reactions.9 Additionally, phosphorus activated carbon-oxygen
bonds can function as effective partners in cross-coupling
reactions.10 To our knowledge, however, there have been
no reports of phosphonium salt activation of pyridine-N-
oxides.
1
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
PyBroP
BroP
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
DBU
2,6-lutidine
NEt3
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
iPr2EtN
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
DCE
DMF
EtOAc
THF
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
25
25
25
25
0f25
70
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
82
75
41
69
55
53
n/re
62
70
n/r
40
78
83
n/r
n/r
n/r
2b
3c
4d
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
PyBop
BOP
Ph3PBr2
a Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were conducted at 0.25 M
concentration with 6 (1.00 equiv), 7 (1.25 equiv), base (3.75 equiv), and
additive (1.30 equiv). b 1.00 equiv of 7. c 5.00 equiv of 7. d 0.10 M
concentration. e No reaction.
(entry 16) were ineffective. Nontrialkylamine bases (entries
10 and 11) performed poorly under the reaction conditions.
A solvent screen demonstrated that dichloromethane (0.25
M) gave the highest yields (entries 1, 4, and 7-9). Interest-
ingly, elevated temperature (entry 6) had a detrimental effect
on the observed yield. Under our optimized conditions, we
used N-oxide 6 as the limiting reagent with a small excess
of 7 (1.25 equiv), PyBroP (1.30 equiv), and a 3-fold excess
of iPr2EtN (3.75 equiv) compared to the amine nucleophile.
The reactions were complete in 5-15 h at room temperature.
The order of reagent addition had no impact on observed
yields.
We next applied the optimized reaction conditions to a
variety of amine nucleophiles (Table 2). When pyridine-N-
oxide 6 was combined with each amine in dichloromethane
and treated with iPr2EtN and PyBroP, we were pleased to
obtain the corresponding 2-aminopyridines in modest to
excellent yields. In none of these instances did we observe
reaction at the 4-position of the pyridine-N-oxide. As shown
in Table 2, primary and secondary aliphatic amines were
very effective nucleophiles (entries 1-6).11 Ammonia (entry
15) also showed modest reactivity under our conditions. The
steric bulk of the amine had little impact on the reaction
outcome, as t-butylamine performed well (entry 12). Ami-
nations with allylic and benzylic amines (entries 7 and 8)
proceeded smoothly as did those with heterocyclic amines
To assess the feasibility of using phosphonium salts as a
means to introduce amines onto pyridine-N-oxides, we
attempted the coupling of pyridine-N-oxide 6 with cyclo-
hexylamine 7 (Table 1). When a basic mixture of 6 and 7
was treated with PyBroP (bromo-tris-pyrrolidino-phospho-
nium hexafluorophosphate), we were delighted to obtain 8
as the major product of the reaction. Remarkably, no addition
at the 4-position of the pyridine-N-oxide was observed. After
reaction optimization, we found that Hunig’s base (iPr2EtN)
and dichloromethane as a base/solvent pair worked most
effectively (entry 1). PyBroP and the closely related BroP
(entry 13) were the only phosphonium salts that afforded
the desired product. Although BroP (83%) slightly outper-
formed PyBroP (82%), we chose not to use BroP due to the
generation of carcinogenic HMPA as a byproduct (vide
infra). Hydroxybenzotriazole-based phosphonium salts (en-
tries 14 and 15) and bromo-triphenylphosphonium bromide
(5) (a) Alcazar, J.; Alonso, J. M.; Bartolome, J. M.; Iturino, L.; Matesanz,
E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 8983–8986. (b) Yamanaka, H.; Araki, T.;
Sakamoto, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1988, 36, 2244–2247.
(6) Han, S.; Kim, Y. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 2447–2476.
(7) Castro, B.; Coste, J. PCT Int. Appl. WO90/10009, 1990.
(8) Abbreviations: PyBroP ) bromo-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium hexaflu-
orophosphate; BroP ) bromo-tris-dimethylamino-phosphonium hexafluo-
rophosphate; PyBOP ) benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-pyrrolidino-phosphonium
hexafluorophosphate; BOP ) benzotriazole-1-yl-oxy-tris-dimethylamino-
phosphonium hexafluorophosphate.
(9) Wan, Z.; Wacharasindhu, S.; Levins, C. G.; Lin, M.; Keiko Tabei,
K.; Mansour, T. S. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 10194–10210.
(10) Kang, F.; Sui, Z.; Murry, W. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
11300–11302.
(11) For entry 6, as anticipated, no racemization and no protecting-group
degredation occurred. Chiral purity was determined on a Chiralpak AD
Column, 5% IPO/heptanes with 0.1% DEA, 210 nm, 1 mL/min flow rate,
and compared to a racemic standard.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 22, 2010
5255