Y. S. Sokeirik et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 2821–2824
2823
CH3
(S)
H3C
O
Rs
Rs
Rs: CF3, C3F7, RL: Ar (S)
Rs: Ar, RL: C7F15 (R)
Li
O
H
+
RL
OH
H
O
RL
Scheme 4.
3. Nasipuri, D.; Bhattacharya, P. K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1977, 576–578.
4. Compound 3 is commercially available..
We have reported that the CBS reduction of perflu-
oroalkyl ketones gave a similar result and rationalized
this inversion of optical rotation as the steric effects
5. General procedure for the reduction. To a solution of (S)-1-
phenylethanol (0.46 mmol, 56 mg, 0.055 mL) in dry toluene
(3.0 mL) was added n-BuLi (1.58 M in hexane, 0.29 mL,
0.46 mmol) at 0 ꢁC. To the resulting mixture was added
slowly the corresponding perfluoroalkyl ketone (0.38
mmol). The mixture was stirred for additional 16 h, and
then quenched with 2 N HCl. After separation of the two
phases, the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O (3 ·
5 mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO4,
and evaporated under vacuum. The residue was purified as
shown for each case.
of perfluoroalkyl groups and phenyl group; C7F15
ꢀ
Ph P C3F7 ꢀ CF3.1 Surprisingly, the CBS reduction
of 11 gave only 10% ee. This suggests that introduction
of a nitro group to ortho position of a phenyl group
decreases the steric difference between C7F15 and Ar
group and that our reduction using lithium alkoxide still
differentiates this small difference. Further, the CBS
reduction of 7 gave 8 in 60% ee,1b while this reduction
of 7 gave 8 of much higher ee. This also shows that
the selectivity of the reduction of this report is much
higher than that of CBS reduction.
(S)-2,2,2-Trifluoro-1-phenylethanol (3). The residue was
separated by column chromatography (SiO2, 5% Et2O
in hexane) to give 3 (40.1 mg, 61%), which was identified
by comparison of the spectral data of the commercially
available authentic sample.4 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.38–7.71
(5H, m), 4.98–5.06 (1H, m), 2.62 (1H, s, disappeared with
D2O). 19F NMR (CDCl3) d: (from C6H5CF3): ꢁ15.25 (3F,
The absolute configurations of 3, 6, 8, 10, and 12 are
reasonably explained by a chair-like six-membered tran-
sition state, where the larger substituents occupy the
equatorial position and the smaller one the axial posi-
tion in the transition state. We assume that the order
of steric effects is C7F15 > Ar P C3F7 > CF3, where Ar
represents (un)substituted phenyl groups. If this
assumption is correct, 1 and 5 would give (S)-products
preferentially, and 7, 9, or 11 would give the correspond-
ing (R)-products. These are consistent with the observed
results, which supports our assumption (Scheme 4).
22
d, J = 6.2 Hz). IR (neat) cmꢁ1: 3450. ½aꢂD +33.02 (c 0.92,
CHCl3). 4,4,4-Trifluoro-3-hydroxy-1,3-diphenyl-butan-1-
one (4) was eluated with 10% Et2O in hexane as a colorless
oil (28.0 mg, 25%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.94–7.91 (2H, m),
7.59–7.55 (3H, m), 7.50–7.47 (2H, m), 7.37–7.31 (3H, m),
4.04 (1H, d, J = 17 Hz), 3.64 (1H, d, J = 17 Hz). 19F NMR
(CDCl3) d: ꢁ17.59 (3F, s). MS m/z 294 (M+). HRMS calcd
for C16H13F3O2: 294.087 (M+), found: 294.087. IR (neat)
cmꢁ1: 3472, 1672.
In conclusion, treatment of perfluoroalkyl aromatic
ketones can be reduced to chiral a-perfluoroalkyl alco-
hols with chiral lithium 1-phenylethoxide in high enan-
tiomeric excesses. This reduction is especially useful
for reduction of aromatic perfluoroalkyl ketones with
a large perfluoroalkyl group, and (S)-1-phenylethoxide
gives (R)-perfluoroalkyl alcohols in good yields and high
ee, while trifluoromethyl ketone gives (S)-alcohol. This
reduction is useful for reduction of perfluoroalkyl
ketones, of which the CBS reduction does not give good
results. This reaction is a modification of Meerwein–
Pondorf–Verley’s reduction. This reaction is an equilib-
rium reaction and cannot be applied for chiral reduction
of hydrocarbon analogs, but a perfluoroalkyl group sta-
bilizes adjacent sp3 carbon. Thus, this method is quite
useful for synthesis of chiral perfluoroalkyl carbinols.
(S)-1H-1-(2-Bromophenyl)perfluorobutan-1-ol (6). The resi-
due was treated with NaBH4 (70 mg, 1.84 mmol) in MeOH
(3 mL) for 18 h at room temperature to reduce the side
product, acetophenone, and to facilitate its removal. The
mixture was quenched with water and extracted with Et2O
(3 · 5 mL). The organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and
evaporated under vacuum. The residue was purified by
column chromatography (SiO2, 5% Et2O in hexane) to give
22:2
6 (127 mg, 78%) as a colorless oil, ½aꢂD +22.39 (c
1.68, CHCl3). 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.70–7.66 (1H, m),
7.61–7.58 (1H, m), 7.43–7.37 (1H, m), 7.29–7.23 (1H, m),
5.86 (1H, m), 3.16 (1H, br s, disappeared with D2O). 19F
NMR (CDCl3) d: ꢁ18.31 to ꢁ18.99 (3F, m), ꢁ53.25 (1F,
m), ꢁ63.22 to ꢁ64.04 (3F, m). MS m/z 354 (M+). HRMS
calcd for C10H679BrF7O: 353.949 (M+), found: 353.949,
HRMS calcd for C10H681BrF7O: 355.947 (M+), found:
355.946. IR (neat) cmꢁ1: 3520.
(R)-1H-1-Phenylperfluorooctan-1-ol (8). The residue was
purified by column chromatography (SiO2, 5% Et2O in
hexane) to give 8 (144 mg, 80%) as white crystals. Mp 63–
References and notes
1
64 ꢁC. H NMR (CDCl3) d: 7.49–7.36 (5H, m), 5.23–5.18
(1H, m), 2.53 (1H, s, disappeared with D2O). 19F NMR
(CDCl3) d: ꢁ18.36 (3F, m), ꢁ53.50 (1F, m), ꢁ57.10 to
ꢁ60.35 (8F, m), ꢁ62.50 (2F, m), ꢁ63.25 (1F, m). MS m/z
476 (M+). HRMS calcd for C14H7F15O: 476.025 (M+),
1. (a) Omote, M.; Kominato, A.; Sugawara, M.; Sato, K.;
Ando, A.; Kumadaki, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 5583–
5585; (b) Omote, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Sato, K.; Ando, A.;
Kumadaki, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 319–322; (c)
Omote, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Sato, K.; Ando, A.; Kumadaki,
I. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 407–409.
21:5
found: 476.025. IR (KBr) cmꢁ1: 3480. ½aꢂD +15.67 (c 0.95,
CHCl3).
(R)-1H-1-(2-Bromophenyl)perfluorooctan-1-ol (10). The
residue was purified by column chromatography (SiO2,
2. Sokeirik, Y. S.; Sato, K.; Ando, A.; Kumadaki, I. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2006, 127, 150–152.