3
science as organic conductors, semiconductors and light
emiting diodes etc.,
85%. The required sulphone 3 was obtained by oxidation of
(methylthio) acrolein 1b by m-Chloroperbenzoic acid (m-CPBA)
in 60% yield26. However the average yield of 2b through
sulphone is 72.5% involving two steps which is less than the
yield directly from the corresponding (methylthio) acroleins 2a.
Therefore it was decided to continue the remaining reactions
directly from (methylthio) acroleins.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the β-
(methylthio) acroleins developed by our group display identical
1,3-dielectrophilic reactivity similar to their precursors
chloroacroleins with the advantage of better yields of product
thiophenes. Therefore the chemistry of this group of building
blocks provides greater advantages over the counterpart
chloroacroleins in-terms of their stability and yields of the
products.
In the next series of experiments (methylthio)acroleins 1c,
1d, 1e and 1f (Table 1) were reacted with ethylthioglycolate
under the described reaction conditions to yield the
corresponding thiophenes 2c, 2d, 2e and 2f in 76-80% yields
(Table 1)
We will continue to explore these new synthetic
applications to further confirm their superiority as 1,3-
dielectrophilic building blocks.
Interestingly Reddy and co workers14 and others15,16 have
reported the synthesis of these thiophenes in comparatively low
yields both by microwave and conventional methods. We
therefore consider our yields from (methylthio) acroleins are
much higher than corresponding chloroacroleins. It must be
however noted that low yields obtained by earlier two research
groups attributed to their slow decompositions of the
chloroacroleins during the course of the reaction with
ethylthioglycolate.
Acknowledgments
H.J. is grateful to Indian National Science Academy (INSA) for
the award of Sr. Scientist. We gratefully acknowledge the CSIR,
New Delhi (02(0106)/12 EMR-II Dated 01/11/12) for the
financial support through the project. We thank J.N. Moorthy of
IIT Kanpur for helping in getting spectral analysis. The authors
thank Dr. P Shyamaraju, Chairman, REVA Institute of science
and Management, Yelahanka, Bengaluru-560 064.
We further examined the thiophenation from
(methylthio) acroleins 1h-m (Table 1) to yield the hitherto
unknown thiophenes 2h-2m respectively. The (methylthio)
acrolein 1g yielded the corresponding thiophene 2g in 84% yield.
Similarly the (methylthio) acrolein 1h derived from 2-
acetylthiophene reacted with ethylthioglycolate under the
described reaction conditions to yield the corresponding 2-
carbethoxy-5-(2-thienyl)-thiophene 2h in 79% yield. The other
(methylthio) acrolein 1i derived from propiophenone reacted with
ethylthioglycolate under identical reaction conditions to yield the
corresponding 4-methyl-5-phenyl-2-carbethoxy thiophene 2i in
72% yield. Also the (methylthio) acroleins 1j and 1k derived
from cyclohexanone and cycloheptanone respectively reacted
with ethylthioglycolate under similar reaction conditions to yield
the corresponding 4, 5-cycloannulated thiophenes 2j and 2k in 79
and 80% yields respectively. Next the (methylthio) acrolein
derived from tetralone 1l also yielded the corresponding 4, 5-
annualated -2-carbethoxy thiophene 2l in 76% yield. Finally the
(methylthio)acrolein 1m derived from 1-phenyl-3-methyl-
pyrazoline-5-one similarly reacted with ethylthio glycolate to
yield the corresponding pyrazolo-thiophene 2m in 71% yield.
The mechanism governing this transformation is
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
found, in the online version, at:
References and notes
1.
2.
Arnold, Z.; Zemlicka, J. Proc. Chem. Soc. London. 1958, 227-
251.
Vilsmeier, A.; Haack, A. Ber. Dtsch.Chem. Ges. 1927, 60B, 119-
127.
3.
4.
Masson, C.M Tetrahedron. 1992, 48, 3659-3726.
Jones, G.; Stanforth, S.P. Organic reactions, In: Larry E.Overman
et.al., John Wiley and Son’s, 2004, 56, 355-659.
Brahma, S.; Ray, J.K. Tetrahedron. 2008, 64, 2883-2896.
Rajput, A. P.; Girase, P. D. Int.J.Pharm.Chem.Biol. Sci. 1913, 3,
25-43.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Paquette, L.A.; Johnson, B.A.; Hinga, F.M. Org. Syn. Coll. Vol.
1973, V, 215-217.
Junjappa, H.; Ila, H.; Asokan, C.V. Tetrahedron. 1990, 46(16)
5423-5506.
Frejd,T.; karlsson, J. O.; Gronowitz,S. J. Org..Chem. 1981, 3132-
3135.
10. Windus,W; Shildneck,P.R. Org. Syth. 1934, 14, 54.
11. Degani , I.; Fochi,R.; Regondi,V. Synthesis. 1983, 630-632.
12. Byre Gowda, G.; Charanraj ,T.P.;Pradeepakumara , C.S.; Ramesh,
N.;Thomas, S.P.; Sadashiva, M.P.; and Junjappa,H, Tetrahedron
Lett. 2014, 55, 4475-4479.
13. Mavrova A.T.; Wesselinova, D.; Tsenov, Y.A.; and Denkova. P.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 63-69.
14. Reddy G.J Latha, D.; Sailaja,S..;Pallavi K.; Srinivas Rao, K.
Heterocycl. Commun. 2004, 10 (6) 411-414.
depicted in Scheme 1. The potassium thioglycolate attacks 1 to
displace methylthio group followed by intramolecular attack by
enolate carbanian to the aldehyde carbonyl group with
elimination of water to yield the desired thiophene (Table 1).
It is therefore interesting to note that the reactivities of
both β-chloroacroleins and β-methyl thioacroleins displayed
identical reactivity with a clear difference of consistently higher
yields in the case methyl thioacroleins.
15. Hauptmann, S.; Weibenfels, M.; Scholz, Werner, E. M.; Kohler, J
Weisflog, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 11, 1317-1319.
16. Fusco, R.; Sannicolo, F. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 1691-1696.
17. Holmes, J.M.; Lee G.C.M.; Wijono M.; Weinkam, R.; Wheeler,
L.A.; Garst. M.E.; J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 1646-1651.
18. Luker, T. J.; Beaton H.G.; Whiting, M.; Mete, A.; Cheshire, D.R
Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7731-7735.
Thiophenes are important class of heterocycles
generally used as17-24 pharmaceuticals and in the area of material