C. Li et al.
Tetrahedron Letters 61 (2020) 152449
but only trace amounts of the product was obtained due to poor
solubility (Entry 12).
With the optimal conditions in hand, we set out to explore the
scope and limitations of the reaction using various alkynyl indoles
derivatives (Table 2). Gratifyingly, substrates possessing either
electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents on the
phenyl ring readily reacted with CO2 to give the corresponding pyr-
ano[4,3-b]indol-1(5H)-ones 2a-g (Entries 1–7). Moreover, sub-
strates bearing ortho- and meta-positioned substituents on the
phenyl ring were likewise tolerated, giving 2h-k in good yields
(Entries 8–11). Additionally, alkynyl indoles with heterocyclic sub-
stituents, such as pyridyl and thienyl, afforded 2l and 2m in 83%
and 93% yield, respectively (Entries 12, 13). It was worth noting
that aliphatic 2-alkynyl indoles were well tolerated, affording 2n
and 2o in 93% and 94% yield, respectively (Entries 14, 15). The reac-
tion was then extended to substrates containing substituted indole
rings, and a range of pyrano[4,3-b]indol-1(5H)-ones 2p-u were
obtained in high yields (Entries 16–21). Notably, the incorporation
of electron-withdrawing groups on the indole rings of these sub-
strates improved the yields, while electron-donating groups gave
reduced yields.
Scheme 1. Reaction of 1v or 1w with CO2.
In previous studies, CO2 was reported as being initially acti-
vated by TBD to form a zwitterionic adduct X (Scheme 2) [12,14].
Nevertheless, in this study, the peak at 183.1 m/z corresponding
to X was not found by MS analysis of the mixture of [HTBD+][TFEÀ]
with CO2 at 100 °C for 7 h, which indicated that X was not the key
intermediate of the reaction. However, a new 13C NMR signal peak
at d = 164.36 ppm appeared, which may belong to the carbonyl car-
bon atom of the carbonate, suggesting CO2 was activated by the
anion [TFEÀ] (Fig. 1). In the FTIR spectrum a new band appeared
at 1637 cmÀ1, which was assigned to the stretching vibration of
the C@O bond of the carbonate, thus confirming its formation
and the 13C NMR data (ESI, Fig. S2).
Scheme 2. Plausible reaction pathway.
On the other hand, when the reaction of 1v or 1w with CO2 was
carried out under the optimized reaction conditions, the desired
product was not obtained. It can therefore be speculated that there
was an interaction between the indole NAH and TBD (Scheme 1).
On the basis of these experimental results, a plausible mecha-
nism is presented in Scheme 2. In [HTBD+][TFEÀ], CO2 was acti-
vated by the anion [TFEÀ] to form carbonate intermediate A.
Then, the CAC bond is formed by nucleophilic attack of the indole
C3-position onto the carbon atom of A to afford intermediate C.
Finally, re-aromatization via deprotonation and cyclization pro-
duces the desired pyrano[4,3-b]indol-1(5H)-ones D and regener-
ates [HTBD+][TFEÀ].
Fig. 1. 13C NMR spectrum of [HTBD+][TFEÀ] and the intermediate derived from
exposure of [HTBD+][TFEÀ] to CO2.
Conclusion
In summary, a new and highly efficient, solvent-free system
was developed for the preparation of various pyrano[4,3-b]indol-
1(5H)-ones using [HTBD+][TFEÀ] as a promoter and CO2 as a C1
resource. The advantages of the present protocol are moderate to
excellent yields, broad substrate scope and easy workup.
was carried out in the absence and presence of the PILs, which
acted as both the solvent and reaction promoter (Table 1). The
reaction did not proceed in the absence of PILs (Entry 1). The PILs
[HDBU+][TFAÀ] and [HDBU+][AcÀ] afforded low yields of 3-phenyl-
5H-pyrano[4,3-b]indol-1-one 2a after 18 h (Entries 2, 3). However,
when [HDBU+][TFEÀ] was used, 2a was obtained in 64% yield
(Entry 4), thus suggesting that the anion of the PILs affected the
reactivity. Encouraged by these results, [HDBN+][TFEÀ] and
[HTBD+][TFEÀ] which have the same anion as [HDBU+][TFEÀ] were
tested, affording 2a in 68% and 96% yield, respectively (Entries 5,
6). Furthermore, we found that 2a was obtained in 95% yield after
7 h (Entry 7), but the yield decreased when the reaction time was
reduced to 6 h (Entry 8). When the reaction was conducted at
100 °C for 7 h, the isolated yield was improved to 99% (Entry 9).
However, the yield decreased significantly upon decreasing the
amount of [HTBD+][TFEÀ] (Entries 10, 11). Finally, the [HTBD+]
[TFEÀ] promoted reaction was examined at room temperature,
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing finan-
cial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared
to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of
China (21601039, 21562010) for financial support.
3