J. Iley et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 2738–2741
2741
6. Palmer, J. T.; Rasnik, D.; Klaus, J. L.; Bro¨mme, D.
J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3193.
7. Roush, W. R.; Gwaltney, S. L.; Cheng, J.; Scheidt, K. A.;
McKerrow, J. H.; Hansell, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 10994.
8. Reddick, J. J.; Cheng, J.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
1967.
¨
9. Powers, J. C.; Asgian, J. L.; Ekicu, O. D.; James, K. E.
Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4639.
10. Otto, H.-H.; Schirmeister, T. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 133.
11. Leung, D.; Abbenante, G.; Fairlie, D. P. J. Med. Chem.
2000, 43, 305.
12. Choi, K.; Siegel, M.; Piper, J. L.; Yuan, L.; Cho, E.;
Strnad, P.; Omary, B.; Rich, K. M.; Khosla, C. Chem.
Biol. 2005, 12, 469.
13. Meara, J. P.; Rich, D. H. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 3357.
14. Roush, W. R.; Hernandez, A. A.; McKerrow, J. H.;
Selzer, P. M.; Hansell, E.; Engel, J. C. Tetrahedron 2000,
56, 9747.
Figure 3. Autodock-generated active site interaction of papain and 4f
(green). His-159 (blue) and Cys-25 (yellow) are also highlighted. Figure
generated using Pymol software: DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molec-
ular Graphics System (2002) DeLano Scientific, San Carlos, CA, USA.
15. Salient data for 9 are as follows: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CD3CN) 1.91 (3H, s, CH3Ar), 3.96 (2H, s, CH2Ph), 7.08–
7.75 (9H, m, ArH); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) 8.41
(CH3Ar), 38.73 (CH2Ph), 121.05, 122.80, 127.58, 128.57,
128.64, 129.36, 132.32, 132.60, 133.52, 135.64, 136.50,
144.95 (Ar). C16H12O2S2 requires: C, 63.55; H, 4.67%.
Found: C, 63.50; H, 4.70%.
alkylation of the active site cysteine that leads to papain
and cathepsin B inactivation.
Acknowledgments
16. Liu, S.; Hanzlik, R. P. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 1067.
17. Kitz, R.; Wilson, I. B. J. Biol. Chem. 1962, 237, 3245.
18. Papain (EC 3.4.22.2, from Sigma) assays were per-
formed as described in Zhao, G.; Zhou, Z. S. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 2331, Gradients from
inhibitor runs were normalized with respect to the
first-order exponential decrease in Bsmoc inhibitor
concentration due to DTT-catalyzed decomposition at
the pH of the incubation.19 Observed pseudo-first-order
rate constants of inactivation, kobsd, were obtained from
plots of % activity against time.
19. Hinchliffe, P. S.; Wood, J. M.; Davis, A. M.; Austin,
R. P.; Beckett, R.; Page, M. I. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2003, 1, 67.
20. Human cathepsin B (EC 3.4.22.1, from Calbiochem)
assays were carried out as described for papain using pH
5.5, 50 mM acetate buffer (2 mM DTT, 2 mM EDTA).
The substrate was Z-Arg-Arg-NA (0.1 mM).
We thank FCT, POCTI, and FEDER (Portugal) for
financial support and a grant to L.M. (SFRH/BD/
6499/2001).
References and notes
1. Carpino, L. A.; Philbin, M.; Ismail, M.; Truran, G. A.;
Mansour, E. M. E.; Iguchi, S.; Ionescu, D.; El Faham, A.;
Riemer, C.; Warrass, R.; Weiss, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9915.
2. Carpino, L. A.; Ismail, M.; Truran, G. A.; Mansour, E.
M. E.; Iguchi, S.; Ionescu, D.; El Faham, A.; Riemer, C.;
Warrass, R. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4324.
3. Greenwald, R. B.; Zhao, H.; Reddy, P. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 4894.
4. Carpino, L. A.; Krause, E.; Sferdean, C. D.; Schumann,
¨
M.; Fabian, H.; Bienert, M.; Beyermann, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 7519.
5. Carpino, L. A.; Ghassemi, S.; Ionescu, D.; Ismail, M.;
Sadat-Aalaee, D.; Truran, G. A.; Mansour, E. M. E.;
Siwruk, G. A.; Eynon, J. S.; Morgan, B. Org. Process Res.
Dev. 2003, 7, 28.
21. PPE (EC 3.4.21.36, from Sigma) inhibition assays were
carried out as described in Ref. 19.
22. AutoDock 3.0; automated docking using a lamarckian
genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy
function Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.;
Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. J. Comp.
Chem. 1998, 19, 1639.