Organic Letters
Letter
Scheme 1. Initial Efforts Towards the Synthesis of 4,5,6-Trisubstituted Indazoles Compared with a More Unified Route
indazoles via the unification of direct C−H functionalization
methodology and a late stage-diversification strategy.
With the requisite 4,6-disubstituted indazoles in hand, our
attention turned to the regioselective C−H functionalization of
the C5-position. Although 1H NMR analysis indicated that the
C7-proton is likely most acidic,33 we speculated that the C4-
fluorine could serve as a directing group to achieve
deprotonation at the C5-position.34−41 Quenching the anion
with an electrophilic chlorinating agent would provide desired
indazole 3c.
Our interest in the syntheses of a diverse array of 4,5,6-
trisubstituted indazoles stemmed from a recent need to
broadly evaluate the structure−activity relationship (SAR) of
this motif as a key pharmacophore in one of our lead-
optimization campaigns. Regrettably, the syntheses of these
functionalized indazoles proved to be lengthy and inefficient.
Moreover, each synthesis had to be tailor-made for the specific
indazole-containing target (Scheme 1A). It became evident
that a unified synthesis of 4,5,6-trisubstituted indazoles with
the potential for late-stage diversification at the 4- and 5-
positions would be highly enabling.
We took inspiration in our route design from the broad
availability of 2,6-difluorobenzaldehydes (Scheme 1B). More-
over, the C2 symmetry of these molecules permits their
cyclization with hydrazine to the corresponding 4,6-disub-
stituted indazoles without a need to establish regiocontrol.
Direct C−H functionalization at the C5-position would serve
as our first point of diversification. Subsequent nucleophilic
aromatic substitution at C4 would further expand the
collection of indazoles that can be accessed through this
synthetic sequence.
Our initial efforts using indazole 2c employed magnesium
bases due to the lower propensity of aryl-magnesium species to
form benzyne at elevated temperatures (Table 1, entries 1−
3).42 Unfortunately, no product was detected when using
Mg(NiPr2)2 or TMPMgCl·LiCl (entries 1 and 2). Using
(TMP)2Mg·2LiCl as the base (entry 3) delivered the desired
chlorination product in low conversion. We then assessed
lithium bases and found that LDA performed well, delivering
the desired product in 44% yield (entry 4) with a high level of
regioselectivity (>20:1, 3c:3c′). Complete consumption of the
starting material was critical for purification as separation of 2c
and 3c was challenging. The use of hexachloroacetone as the
electrophilic chlorinating agent (entry 5) proved unfruitful, as
3c was isolated in diminished yield. It is known that LiCl can
aid in the reduction of aggregates in lithiation reactions.43−46
The addition of LiCl in this transformation provided a cleaner
reaction profile, furnishing the desired product in 68% yield,
while maintaining high levels of regioselectivity (entry 6).
Employing n-BuLi as the base flipped the regioselectivity to
favor chlorination at the 7-position (entry 7), delivering 3c′ as
the major regioisomer in good yield. It is known that THP
protecting groups have demonstrated the ability to serve as o-
directing groups in o-lithiations.47,48 Additionally, due to steric
effects of the THP group, the 7-position could be more
accessible to nBuLi than LDA. Finally, a slight exotherm was
observed upon addition of the electrophile, which we
speculated could impact the stability of the anion. As such,
inverse addition, wherein the indazole anion was added to a
precooled solution of the electrophile, was applied (entry 8).
This protocol provided a moderate increase in yield and an
improved reaction profile to deliver 3c in 81% isolated yield.
Additional optimization studies focused on reducing the
loading of reagents to deliver a more process-friendly protocol.
With optimized conditions in hand, the scope of the
regioselective C−H chlorination was evaluated (Scheme 3).
Chlorination of indazoles containing either electron-with-
drawing or electron-donating C6-functional groups was
successful (3a−d), with 3c being obtained on >40 g scale.
We subsequently found that the lithiated species could be
quenched with a variety of electrophiles to achieve C5-
Our initial efforts focused on optimizing the formation of
1H-indazoles 2a−d (Scheme 2) from the corresponding 2,6-
Scheme 2. Formation of Indazoles 2a−d Using Aryl
Aldehydes and Hydrazine Followed by THP-Protection
difluorobenzaldehyde starting material. Inspired by the work of
Lukin and co-workers,21 a one-pot, two-step sequence was
examined. The aryl hydrazone is preformed in tetrahydrofuran
(THF) followed by solvent exchange to dimethyl sulfoxide
(DMSO) and ring closure to furnish our desired indazole. By
adapting previously reported conditions for a one-step
hydrazone formation, ring closure provided access to the
target indazole using 1,4-dioxane as solvent.31 Subsequent
THP-protection provided the protected 1H-indazole.32 This
sequence was successful with both electron-withdrawing (2a−
2c) and electron-donating (2d) groups at the C4-postion,
albeit with depreciated yield for the electron-rich substrate.
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX