target for total synthesis. In the course of planning such an
endeavor, we recognized that a bicyclo[5.4.0]undecane ring
system is embedded within the framework of 1 (depicted in
bold in Figure 1). A tandem 7-exo-6-exo radical cyclization
would be a particularly efficient means of preparing this
structural motif. Accordingly, we decided to study the facility
and stereoselectivity of this process with model substrates
prior to commencing the total synthesis. Herein, we report
that 7-exo-6-exo and 7-exo-5-exo cascade cyclizations which
employ an acyl radical in the initial ring closure proceed in
good yields with excellent levels of diastereoselectivity.
To mimic the 2-pyridone moiety of 1 and take advantage
of the precedent of Boger,3 we targeted phenyl-tethered
phenyl selenoester 12 as our initial cyclization substrate and
prepared it as outlined in Scheme 1. Thus, saponification of
forded ester 3, which was reduced with LiAlH4. Treatment
of the resultant crude alcohol with TBS-Cl provided differ-
entially protected diol 4. Cleavage of the PMB ether
delivered phenethyl alcohol 5, which was converted into the
corresponding bromide in excellent yield. Alkylation of
diethyl acetone 1,3-dicarboxylate (DEADC) by this bromide
provided 6 in good yield. Careful optimization of Johnson’s
conditions10 was required to preclude styrene formation via
elimination of the bromide.
Reduction of 6 with NaBH4 was modestly syn selective11
and provided 7 as a mixture of diastereomers after TBS
protection. The minor anti diastereomer was gradually
removed over the course of the next few steps. Conversion
of both ester moieties to the corresponding Weinreb amides
was followed by attempts to form bisolefin 10 via a
reduction-Wittig olefination sequence. Unfortunately, sig-
nificant differences in the reduction rates of the two amides
necessitated the stepwise approach to 10 portrayed in Scheme
1. Then, selective cleavage of the primary benzylic silyl ether
mediated by camphorsulfonic acid (CSA) was followed by
oxidation and phenyl selenoesterification,12 delivering cy-
clization substrate 12 in good yield.
Scheme 1. Preparation of Phenyl Selenoester 12
Pleasingly, treatment of 12 with Et3B, air, and tris-
(trimethylsilyl)silane according to a slight modification of
the conditions disclosed by Evans4c provided tricycle 13 in
excellent yield as a single diastereomer (Scheme 2). The trans
Scheme 2. Tandem 7-exo-6-exo Cyclization of 12
ring fusion and relative configuration of the methyl-bearing
stereocenter of 13 are consistent with data obtained from
both 1D and 2D NMR experiments.13 Notably, (TMS)3SiH
proved critical to the success of the cyclization, as use of
the more rapid hydrogen-atom donor Bu3SnH resulted in a
complex mixture from which prematurely reduced byprod-
ucts could be tentatively identified. Interestingly, we found
that vigorous stirring of the reaction mixture was crucial to
the reproducibility of the reaction. We propose that fast
stirring leads to an increase in the surface area of the solution
that is exposed to air, thereby increasing the concentration
of oxygen in solution and resulting in more efficient initiation
of the radical cascade process.
Intrigued by this result, we next examined cascade
cyclizations of substrates related to 12 in order to ascertain
1-isochromanone (2)9 and exhaustive PMB protection af-
(6) (a) Ryu, I.; Miyazato, H.; Kuriyama, H.; Matsu, K.; Tojino, M.;
Fukuyama, T.; Minakata, S.; Komatsu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
5632. (b) Tojino, M.; Otsuka, M.; Fukuyama, T.; Matsubara, H.; Schiesser,
C. H.; Kuriyama, H.; Miyazato, H.; Minakata, S.; Komatsu, M.; Ryu, I.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 4262.
(7) For a review on radical cascade reactions, see: McCarroll, A. J.;
Walton, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2224. For examples of
cascades employing acyl radicals, see ref 2a.
(9) Kim, S. S.; Sar, S. K.; Tamrakar, P. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2002,
23, 937.
(10) Johnson, W. S.; Plummer, M. S.; Reddy, S. P.; Bartlett, W. R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 515.
(11) Williams, R. M.; Lee, B. H.; Miller, M. M.; Anderson, O. P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1073.
(12) Singh, U.; Ghosh, S. K.; Chadha, M. S.; Mamdapur, V. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 255.
(8) Kobayashi, J.; Hirasawa, Y.; Yoshida, N.; Morita, H. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 66, 5901.
(13) See Supporting Information for details on structural assignments.
1868
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 9, 2006