682
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 54, No. 3, March, 2005
Kuznetsov et al.
OH); 2.50 (dd, 1 H, J = 11.8 Hz, J = 15.9 Hz); 2.71 (dd, 1 H,
J = 1.9 Hz, J = 15.9 Hz); 3.07 (m, 1 H); 3.60 (dd, 1 H, J =
6.8 Hz, J = 10.6 Hz); 3.65 (dd, 1 H, J = 6.2 Hz, J = 10.6 Hz);
3.90 (dd, 1 H, J = 5.9 Hz, J = 10.9 Hz); 3.95 (dd, 1 H, J =
4.0 Hz, J = 10.9 Hz); 7.10—7.19 (m, 3 H); 7.31 (d, 1 H, J =
7.5 Hz). 13C NMR (127 MHz), δ: 30.14 (CH2); 33.30 (CH2);
36.69 (CH); 40.48 (CH); 66.90 (CH2OH); 67.60 (CH2OH);
126.09 (2 CH); 126.84 (CH); 129.52 (CH); 136.63 (C);
137.73 (C).
116.85 (CH); 127.84 (CH); 128.58 (CH); 129.31 (CH); 136.87
(CH); 139.32 (CH); 142.62 (C).
Dimethyl 2ꢀ(1ꢀmethoxyꢀ2ꢀpropenyl)phenylboronate (13).
A solution of 12 (7.5 g, 27.4 mmol) in THF (30 mL) was cooled
to –95—–100 °C and BuLi (2.5 mol L–1, 12 mL, 30.0 mmol)
was added with stirring using a syringe. After 1 min, the lithium
derivative precipitated, and the temperature rapidly increased
to –70 °C. Then the mixture was cooled to –90 °C and a soluꢀ
tion of trimethyl borate (4.68 g, 5.1 mL, 45 mmol) in Et2O
(4 mL) was added. The mixture was gradually warmed to 0 °C,
after which TMSCl (3.8 g, 4.4 mL, 35 mmol) was added, the
mixture was stirred for 30 min, and the solvents were removed
under reduced pressure. The residue was treated with hexane
and the clean solution was decanted. Vacuum distillation afꢀ
forded compound 13 in a yield of 4.7 g (79%), b.p. 77—78 °C
(2 Torr). Found (%): C, 65.60; H, 7.80. C12H17BO3. M = 220.07.
Calculated (%): C, 65.49; H, 7.79. 1H NMR (400 MHz), δ: 3.43
(s, 3 H); 3.53 (s, 6 H); 4.69 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz); 5.40 (m, 2 H);
5.84 (m, 1 H); 7.16—7.35 (m, 4 H). 13C NMR (127 MHz),
δ: 52.05 (2 CH3); 55.76 (CH3); 84.59, 118.92 (CH); 124.98
(CH); 126.68 (CH); 127.80 (CH); 130.54 (CH); 137.41 (CH);
143.49 (C).
Diallylꢀ[2ꢀ(1ꢀmethoxyꢀ2ꢀpropenyl)phenyl]borane (14).
A mixture of compound 13 (1.8 g, 8.2 mmol) and triallylborane
(2.4 g, 3.2 mL, 18 mmol) was heated for 6 h in a flask for
distillation under a stream of Ar at 55—60 °C and 60 Torr.
Vacuum distillation afforded compound 14 in a yield of 1.6 g
(82%), b.p. 109—110 °C (2 Torr). Found (%): C, 80.05; H, 8.74.
C16H21BO. M = 240.15. Calculated (%): C, 80.02; H, 8.81.
1H NMR (400 MHz), δ: 1.60—1.67 (m, 3 H); 1.73—1.79 (m,
1 H); 3.69 (s, 3 H); 4.70 (d, 2 H, J = 9.8 Hz); 4.81 (t, 2 H, J =
17.2 Hz); 5.28 (d, 1 H, J = 8.9 Hz); 5.57—5.62 (m, 2 H);
5.69—5.77 (m, 1 H); 5.77—5.84 (m, 2 H); 6.96 (d, 1 H, J =
1.6 Hz, J = 5.7 Hz); 7.20 (td, 1 H, J = 1.6 Hz, J = 7.6 Hz);
7.28—7.32 (m, 2 H). 13C NMR (127 MHz), δ: 30.58 (br, 2 CH2);
55.12 (CH3); 93.72 (CH); 110.69 (CH2); 111.18 (CH2); 121.06
(CH); 122.65 (CH); 125.57 (CH); 127.55 (CH); 128.09 (CH);
134.84 (CH); 138.26 (C); 141.25 (CH); 141.38 (CH). 11B NMR
(128 MHz), δ: 14.8.
6,7ꢀBenzoꢀ3ꢀbenzylꢀ3ꢀazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (11). Tosyl
chloride (1.75 g, 9.2 mmol) was added to a solution of diol 10
(0.8 g, 4.16 mmol) in pyridine (10 mL) at 0 °C and the mixture
was stirred for 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC
(AcOEt—nꢀC6H14, 1 : 1). After consumption of the starting
compound 10, pyridine was evaporated under reduced pressure.
The residue was washed successively with water and 3 N HCl,
extracted with CH2Cl2 (10 mL), dried with Na2SO4, and conꢀ
centrated. The ditosyl derivative was dissolved in toluene
(40 mL), benzylamine (1.34 g, 1.36 mL, 12.5 mmol) was added,
and the mixture was refluxed for 14 h. The reaction was moniꢀ
tored by TLC (AcOEt—nꢀC6H14, 1 : 2). After consumption of
the starting ditosylate, an excess of 6 N NaOH was added. The
organic layer was separated, filtered, dried with K2CO3, and
concentrated in vacuo. The product was purified by filtration
through a small layer of SiO2 in the AcOEt—nꢀC6H14 system
(1 : 5), and the nonpolar fraction of amine 11 (yellow oil)
was collected. The yield was 0.93 g (86%), Rf = 0.73
(AcOEt—nꢀC6H14, 1 : 5). Found (%): C, 86.31; H, 8.14; N, 5.09.
C19H21N. M = 263.38. Calculated (%): C, 86.65; H, 8.04;
N, 5.32. 1H NMR (400 MHz), δ: 1.85 (br.d, 1 H, J = 12.1 Hz);
1.95 (br.d, 1 H, J = 12.1 Hz); 2.23 (m, 1 H); 2.35 (dd, 1 H, J =
1.9 Hz, J = 10.3 Hz); 2.43 (dd, 1 H, J = 1.9 Hz, J = 10.6 Hz);
2.79 (br.d, 1 H, J = 10.3 Hz); 2.86—2.92 (m, 3 H); 3.14 (dd,
1 H, J = 7.2 Hz, J = 17.4 Hz); 3.45 (s, 2 H); 6.94 (m, 2 H); 7.04
(d, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz); 7.12—7.25 (m, 6 H). 13C NMR (127 MHz),
δ: 28.72 (CH2); 29.93 (CH2); 34.97 (CH); 35.82 (CH); 60.14
(CH2); 61.14 (CH2); 62.16 (CH2); 124.55 (CH); 125.52 (CH);
126.31 (CH); 127.35 (CH); 127.85 (3 CH); 128.00 (2 CH);
138.80 (C); 139.25 (C); 141.37 (C).
1ꢀIodoꢀ2ꢀ(1ꢀmethoxyꢀ2ꢀpropenyl)benzene (12). 1ꢀ(2ꢀIodoꢀ
phenyl)ꢀ2ꢀpropenꢀ1ꢀol (15.8 g, 60.8 mmol), which was preꢀ
pared according to a known procedure,16 and MeI (12.95 g,
5.7 mL, 91.2 mmol) were dissolved in THF (120 mL) under
argon and cooled to –40 °C. Then NaH (60%, 3.3 g, 82 mmol)
was added. The reaction mixture was slowly warmed to
–15—–10 °C. At this temperature, the reaction proceeded rather
vigorously. After hydrogen evolution ceased, the reaction mixꢀ
ture was allowed to warm to room temperature. The reaction
was monitored by TLC (AcOEt—nꢀC6H14, 1 : 4). The reaction
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h and then conꢀ
centrated in vacuo. The residue was treated with water and exꢀ
tracted with CH2Cl2. The extracts were dried with K2CO3 and
concentrated. The residue was distilled in vacuo. Iodide 12 was
obtained in a yield of 14 g (84%), b.p. 77—78 °C (2 Torr),
Rf = 0.74 (AcOEt—nꢀC6H14, 1 : 4). Found (%): C, 43.93;
H, 4.10. C10H11IO. M = 274.10. Calculated (%): C, 43.82;
H, 4.05. 1H NMR (400 MHz), δ: 3.35 (s, 3 H); 4.95 (d, 1 H, J =
6.2 Hz); 5.25 (d, 1 H, J = 10.3 Hz); 5.38 (d, 1 H, J = 17.1 Hz);
5.88 (ddd, 1 H, J = 6.2 Hz, J = 10.3 Hz, J = 17.1 Hz); 6.99 (t,
1 H, J = 6.9 Hz); 7.40 (m, 2 H); 7.84 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz).
13C NMR (127 MHz), δ: 56.57 (CH3); 86.83 (CH); 98.98 (C—I);
Xꢀray diffraction study of compound 10. Crystals of diol 10
at –100 °C are monoclinic, space group P21/n, a = 11.552(2),
b = 7.729(1), c = 11.704(2)Е, β = 99.92(3)°, V = 1029.4(4) Å3,
Z = 4, dcalc = 1.240 g cm–3, µ(MoꢀKα) = 0.83 cm–1
,
F(000) = 416. The intensities of 2360 reflections were measured
at –110 °C on a Syntex P21 diffractometer (λ(MoꢀKα) =
0.71072 Å, θ/2θ scanning technique, 2θ < 54°); 2251 indepenꢀ
dent reflections (Rint = 0.0414) were used in the refinement.
The structure was solved by direct methods using successive
difference electron density maps. All hydrogen atoms were loꢀ
calized from difference electron density maps. The structure was
refined against F 2 with anisotropic displacement parameters
hkl
for nonhydrogen atoms and isotropic displacement parameters
for hydrogen atoms. The final R factors for 10 are R1 = 0.0430
(based on Fhkl for 1393 reflections with I > 2σ(I )), wR2 = 0.1128
(based on F 2hkl for reflections), GOOF = 0.837. All calculations
were carried out using the SHELXTL 5.10 program package.17
This study was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos 05ꢀ03ꢀ33268
and 05ꢀ03ꢀ32953), the Foundation of the President of the
Russian Federation (Grant NSh 1917.2003.2), and the