ꢁꢀꢀꢀ
J. Wang et al.: Efficient synthesis of 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-morpholinomethyl-1,4-benzoquinone hydrochlorideꢂ
ꢂ223
formed immediately, the solids were filtered and recrys-
tallized from ethanol to afford the required hydrochloride
salts 5 (0.32 g, 95 % yield). M. p. 164–166 °C (lit. 163–165 °C)
3.2 2-Bromomethyl-5, 6-dimethoxy-3-methyl-
[1, 4]benzoquinone (3)
Excess CAN (62.5 g, 0.114 mol) in water (120 mL) was added [9]. – IR (KBr): v ꢀ=ꢀ 3443, 2538, 2435, 1671, 1649, 1605, 1463,
1
dropwise at 0 °C to a solution of compound 2 (11.6 g, 0.038 1266, 1206, 1020 cm–1. – H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): δ ꢀ=ꢀ 4.15
mol) in THF (20 mL). The mixture was stirred at room tem- (s, 2H, CH2), 3.85 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.4 (brs,
perature for 2 h. The progress of the reaction was moni- 8H, H-morpholino), 2.04 (s, 3H, CH3). – MS (API): m/z ꢀ=ꢀ
+
tored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, the crude 282 [M+H] . 1H NMR and 13C NMR data were in agreement
was extracted with three portions of CH2Cl2 (15 mL). The with the values in the literature [9].
orange extracts were washed with brine until the water
phase was neutral (PH~7), then dried over anhydrous Acknowledgments: This investigation was supported by
Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was the China Scholarship Council (CSC) (no. 201208530032)
purified using silica-gel column chromatography with and the Science Foundation of the Department of Educa-
petroleum ether and EtOAc (3:1) as an eluent to give the tion of Yunnan Province (no. 2011J077).
desired benzoquinone 5 (8.7 g, 84 % yield) as an orange
oil. – IR (KBr): v ꢀ=ꢀ 2949, 1665, 1619, 1457, 1282, 1211, 1159,
1113, 1023 cm–1. – H NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N): δ ꢀ=ꢀ 4.29 (s,
1
References
2H, CH2Br), 3.88 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.86 (s, 3H, OCH3), 1.99 (s,
13
3H, CH3). – C NMR (125 MHz, MeOD): δ ꢀ=ꢀ 183.7 (C ꢀ=ꢀ O),
[1] G. Lenaz, M. L. Genova, Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009, 1787, 563.
181.6 (C ꢀ=ꢀ O), 144.7, 144.2, 142.3, 136.7, 61.2 (OCH3), 61.1
[2] M. Turunen, J. Olssonc, G. Dallnera, Biochim. Biophys. Acta.
(OCH3), 35.0 (CH2Br), 11.8 (CH3). 1H NMR and 13C NMR data
2004, 1660, 171.
were in agreement with the values in the literature [22].
[3] M. Bentinger, M. Tekle, G. Dallner, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 2010, 396, 74.
[4] M. Bentinger, K. Brismar, G. Dallner, Mitochondrion 2007, 7, S41.
[5] B. H. Lipshutz, A. Lower, V. K. Schein, F.Wetterich, Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 4095.
3.3 2,3-Dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-morpholino-
methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (4)
[6] A. M. James, H. M.Cochemé, M. Murai, H. Miyoshi,
M. P. Murphy, FEBS. J. 2010, 277, 2067.
Benzoquinone (3) (0.41 g, 1.5 mmol), morpholine (0.14 mL,
1.6 mmol), and K2CO3 (0.28 g, 2.0 mmol) in ethanol (2 mL)
were heated at 60 °C for 2 h, the progress of the reaction
was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction,
the crude product was extracted with three portions of
CH2Cl2 (10 mL). The orange extracts were washed with
brine until the water phase was neutral (PH~7), then
dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo.
The crude product was purified using a silica-gel column
chromatography with petroleum ether and EtOAc (5:1) as
an eluent to give the desired compound 4 (0.34 g, 81 %
yield). – IR (KBr): v ꢀ=ꢀ 3437, 2955, 2852, 1645, 1454, 1264,
[7] Z. Pei, T. Gustavsson, R. Roth, T. Frejd, C. Hägerhäll, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 3457.
[8] Y. S. Jung, B. Y. Joe, S. J. Cho, Y. Konishi, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 1125.
[9] K. Okamoto, M. Matsumoto, M. Watanabe, M. Kawada,
T. Imamoto, I. Imada, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 3745.
[10] H. Yabunaka, A. Kenmochi, Y. Nakatogawa, K. Sakamoto, H.
Miyoshi, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2002, 1556, 106.
[11] J. Wang, J. Yang, B. Yang, J. Sun, T. Yang, J. Chem. Res. 2010,
34, 724.
[12] J. Wang, J. Yang, B. Yang, X. Hu, J. Sun, T. Yang, J. Chem. Res.
2010, 34, 717.
[13] J. Wang, J. Yang, R. G. Zhou, B. Yang,Y. S. Wu, J. Chem. Res.
2011, 35, 428.
1
1202, 1039 cm–1. – H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ ꢀ=ꢀ 3.96
[14] J. Wang, R. G. Zhou, T. Wu, T. Yang, Q. X. Qin, L. Li, B. Yang,
J. Yang, J. Chem. Res. 2012, 36, 121.
(s, 3H, OCH3), 3.94 (s, 3H, OCH3), 3.65 (t, J ꢀ=ꢀ 4 Hz, 4H,
H-morpholino), 3.38 (s, 2H, CH2), 2.44 (t, J ꢀ=ꢀ 4 Hz, 4H,
[15] J. Wang, X. Hu, J. Yang, Synthesis. 2014, 46, 2371.
1
H-morpholino), 2.16 (s, 3H, CH3). H NMR data were in [16] J. Wang, S. Li, X. Hu, J. Yang, Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2014, 46, 469.
[17] J. Wang, S. Li, T. Yang, J. Yang, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 86, 710.
agreement with the values in the literature [9].
[18] J. Wang, J. Yang, R. G. Zhou, B. Yang,Y. S. Wu, J. Chem. Res.
2011, 35, 431.
[19] J. Wang, S. Li, T. Yang, J.R. Zeng, J. Yang, Chemical Papers.
3.4 2,3-Dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-morpholinome-
2015, 69, 486.
thyl-1,4-benzoquinone hydrochloride (5)
[20] J.Wang, S. Li, T. Yang, J. Yang, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 9029.
[21] W. Ma, D.-W. Li, T.-C. Sutherland, Y. Li, Y.-T. Long, H.-Y. Chen,
Compound 4 (0.30 g, 1.06 mmol) was dissolved in ethanol
(1 mL) and concentrated HCl was added dropwise until
the pH of the solution was 1–2. An orange precipitate was
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12366.
[22] H. Matsumoto, Y. Niiro, T. Satoh, H. Ueda, WO1996005202 A1,
1996.
Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Services
Authenticated
Download Date | 5/30/15 4:20 AM