J. H. Ahn et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 2996–2999
2997
structure–activity relationship (SAR) study of rhoda-
nine derivatives as PRL-3 inhibitors.
PRL-3 protein was overexpressed as His-tag fusion pro-
tein in Escherichia coli and purified. Assays were
performed
using
6,8-difluoro-4-methylumbelliferyl
A series of rhodanine derivatives was synthesized
according to the Schemes 1 and 2. 5-Bromosalicylalde-
hyde (1a, X = Br) was reacted with rhodanine in the
presence of ammonium acetate to produce the corre-
sponding rhodanine derivative (2). Also salicylaldehydes
(1, X = H or Br) was benzylated and then coupled with
rhodanine, N-methylrhodanine, or thiazolidinedione to
afford 3a–d. Reduction of 3a by lithium borohydride
in pyridine gave compound 4. Next, 5-bromosalicylalde-
hyde (1a, X = Br) was treated with methanesulfonyl
chloride in pyridine or the appropriate benzyl halide
equivalents to provide the corresponding aldehydes,
which was converted to 5a–e by treatment with rhoda-
nine. Also, 1 was coupled with benzyl bromide to
produce 6, which adopted diverse aryl groups at 5-posi-
tion by Suzuki type coupling, followed by attaching rho-
danine moiety to afford the desired compounds 7a–d.
Rhodanine derivatives with naphthalene skeleton were
prepared as outlined in Scheme 2. 3-Hydroxynaphtha-
lene-2-carbaldehyde (8) was benzylated by several ben-
zyl bromides, and condensed with rhodanine to give
the corresponding naphthalydene rhodanine derivatives
(9a–d).
phosphate (DIFMUP) as a substrate at 25 ꢁC for
5 min in 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.0), 5 mM DTT, in
the presence or absence of the inhibitor. After the addi-
tion of purified PRL-3 (0.3 lM) and DIFMUP (5 lM),
the reaction mixture was incubated for 5 min. The reac-
tion was stopped by the addition of sodium orthovana-
date (20 mM). The phosphatase activities were
measured by the absorbance changes caused by hydroly-
sis of the substrate at 460 nm. IC50 values were an aver-
age of triplicate experiments as determined from direct
regression curve analysis. Pentamidine was used as a
reference.
The result for the rhodanine derivatives is shown in
Table 1. While 5-bromosalicylaldehyde (1b, X = Br)
was not active, introduction of a rhodanine group pro-
vided an active PRL-3 inhibitor with an IC50 of
9.5 lM (2). Benzyl substitution of OH at 2-position
exhibited enhanced potency (3.0 lM, 3a), and was al-
most 20-fold more potent than reference pentamidine.
Either elimination of Br at 5-position (3b) or introduc-
tion of thiazolidinedione instead of rhodanine abolished
the activity (3c). N-Methylation was also detrimental to
the in vitro activity (3d). Compound 4 produced by
reduction of double bond of compound 3a showed sim-
ilar activity (4.0 lM).
All compounds prepared were evaluated for their in vitro
inhibitory activity against recombinant human PRL-3.
These data suggest that substituents at 2- and 5-position
of benzene ring influence the in vitro inhibitory activity.
Introduction of sulfonyl group or pyridinylmethyl group
at R2 position showed no inhibitory activities (5a and
5b). Introduction of 2-chlorobenzyl group as R1 demon-
strated comparable potency with 3a (5c, 2.4 lM). Intro-
duction of 2-bromobenzyl substituent (5e) exhibited
enhanced potency, and is the first of our compounds
to break the micromolar barrier with an IC50 value of
0.9 lM. Various substitution at R2 position resulted in
IC50 values in the range of 1.2–3.7 lM. Compound 7d
was another submicromolar inhibitor toward PRL-3
with an IC50 value of 0.9 lM.
OH
O
NH
S
S
a
S
Br
O
Bn
Bn
OH
X
O
O
O
O
H
b, a
c
Z
N
NH
S
Y
S
X
Br
b
d, a
O
R1
R1
R1
O
O
O
O
O
Naphthalene based rhodanine derivatives were another
possibility to show PRL-3 inhibition comparable to that
of the benzene as shown in Table 2. The effect of R lipo-
philicity showed similar trend as benzylidene series.
Among them, compound 9d showed an IC50 of 1.7 lM.
e, a
H
NH
NH
S
S
S
S
Br
R2
X
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) rhodanine, N-methylrhoda-
nine or thiazolidinedione, NH4OAc, AcOH, benzene, reflux; (b) benzyl
bromide, K2CO3, KI, acetone, reflux; (c) LiBH4, pyridine, THF, and
reflux; (d) methanesulfonyl chloride, pyridine, rt or R1Br, K2CO3, KI,
acetone, reflux; (e) R2B(OH)2, Pd(dppf)2Cl2, Na2CO3, 100 ꢁC.
Recently, we reported the crystal structure of PRL-1
protein for the first time.8 Our crystal structure revealed
a well-ordered active-site structure with catalytically
important residues in active conformations, providing
the insight into the mode of interaction between rhoda-
nine compounds and PRL proteins. NH-Group in
rhodanine ring may be deprotonated, mimicing nega-
tively charged substrates. This moiety would be directed
toward the active-site P-loop that are surrounded by
positively charged guanidine group from Arg110 and
several amide groups from main-chain atoms. As stated
previously, N-methylation in rhodanine resulted in no
inhibitory activity, supporting this notion. Further, the
R
OH
O
O
O
H
NH
S
S
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) RX, K2CO3, KI, acetone,
reflux; (b) rhodanine, NH4OAc, AcOH, benzene, reflux.