C. Bonini, G. Righi / Tetrahedron 58 (2002) 4981±5021
Table 7. Commercially available ligands with average costs
4995
catalysts 3 and ent-3 (see Fig. 2) were shown to be the
optimum catalysts in terms of availability, cost and broad
application to the enantioselective oxidation of many
unfunctionalised ole®ns. They are now commercially avail-
able as chiral ligands (Table 7, entries 13±14) and also as
their Mn(III) and Co(II) complexes (entries 15±18) for use
in different reactions. Alternatively, the synthesis of the
required enantiomerically pure salen ligands can be carried
out with optically active diamines and substituted salicyl-
aldehydes.78
Entry
Catalyst
Quantity
Cost (US $)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(DHQ)2AQN
500 mg
500 mg
500 mg
1 g
250 mg
250 mg
10 g
10 g
5 g
25 g
10 g
25 g
1 g
1 g
1 g
33
33
31
49
25
25
13
13
14
9
40
14
27
26
35
39
28
28
(DHQD)2AQN
(DHQ)2PHAL
(DHQD)2PHAL
(DHQ)2PYR
(DHQD)2PYR
AD-mix-a
AD-mix-b
d(2)-DET
l(1)-DET
d(2)-DIPT
l(1)-DIPT
(R,R)-Salen
(S,S)-Salen
(R,R)-Co(II)Salen-ent55
(S,S)-Co(II)Salen-55
(R,R)-Mn(III)Salen-ent16
(S,S)-Mn(III)Salen-16
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Improved results are also expected in the use of the ligands
on both soluble and insoluble supports.79 There have been
many attempts to optimise conditions in the polymer-
supported oxidative methodologies. While only little
progress has been made for the supported AE of allylic
alcohols,80 more promising results have appeared recently
for the AD81 and related AA82 processes. Interesting results
have also been reported for the Salen-AE,79d,83 although
catalyst decomposition is still the major limitation of this
solid-phase application. The developments in the area are
continuously growing and appropriate references can be
found as cited above.
1 g
1 g
1 g
a
From the Aldrich chemical catalogue 2000-2001.
AE of allylic alcohols, although the D(2) enantiomer is
more expensive than the l(1) enantiomer (see entries
9±12), but both have reasonably low prices. Additionally
the discovery of the AE with the use of the tartaric ligands
did not require improvements in the ligand design, since
they proved to be the perfect ligand of choice for most of
the AE reactions: without particular restrictions due to the
ligands used. The limitation, at the beginning, of the use of
the tartaric ligands in stoichiometric quantities has now
been overcome with their use in catalytic amounts (see the
discussion in Section 3.2).
3.2. Catalysis in the enantioselective oxidation
The need for catalytic processes in organic reactions has
become even more important than in previous work, given
the higher cost of the new complex reagents, as well as the
associated environmental problems, especially with the use
of toxic and polluting reagents on a large scale. The
catalytic version of an asymmetric oxidation of ole®ns
therefore appears to be particularly desirable and efforts
have been made in all the processes to make these reactions
truly catalytic. While the ®rst AE procedure in 1980 was
performed in a stoichiometric quantity, the other more
recent oxidative processes (the AD, Salen-AE and the last
AA, as well as the oxone-catalysed oxidation) were all
designed and realised in a catalytic version, in order to
make them immediately of high appeal for large-scale
reactions.
On the contrary, the discovery of, and improvements in
ligands used for the AD, and especially for the successive
AA, are still continuing, and, since the early attempts with
the cinchona alkaloids, many others have been prepared and
tested. In Table 7, the costs of the most successful and
available ligands are reported, both for the AD and for the
AA (entries 1±6). It should be pointed out that the complete
set of AD reagents, the AD mix formulation, is now
commercially available (see entries 7±8). The cost of this
complete set appears to be high compared to the prices of
the single reagents, and the routine use of this AD-mix
reagent must therefore be replaced by that of the standard
ligands and conditions. Due to the high cost of the ligands
(as well as the toxicity and cost of osmium sources),77 major
interest has been reported in their ef®cient utilisation on
supports and the facile recovery of the catalysts (see the
following discussion). The ligands have been now
optimised and almost all classes of ole®ns can be
dihydroxylated with good to excellent enantioselectivity
by carefully choosing the appropriate ligands. The recom-
mended ligands for each ole®n class presented in Table 3,
must therefore be compared with their availability and cost
as listed in Table 7. This variable use of different ligands,
often to be tested in the AD of particular ole®ns, represents a
limitation of the methodology, since there is no general and
widespread use of a single ligand for every class of ole®ns.
Since its discovery, the stoichiometric version of the AE of
allylic alcohols has often encountered some dif®culties,
especially in the isolation/puri®cation of unstable and/or
water-soluble epoxyalcohols, probably due to the mild
acidity of the Ti(OiPr)4 and to the tedious aqueous work-
up. In 1986, it was ®rst reported84 that the addition of
molecular sieves was able to reduce the use of the Ti±
tartrate complex to only 5±10%, for the complete achieve-
ment of the epoxidation reaction. The most recommended
catalytic procedure85 utilised is reported in Scheme 16. The
The discovery and optimisation for the Salen-AE ligands
required a testing period in order to obtain the most ef®cient
and versatile of the different ligands. The two Jacobsen
Scheme 16.