A subsequent olefination gave ester 13, which was reduced
to furnish alcohol 10. Because of the pronounced acid
sensitivity of this alcohol it was used without purification,
and subsequent Diels-Alder reactions could only be per-
formed under thermal conditions with added base.
Scheme 5. Oxidation Chemistry of Imidazolone 16 and X-ray
Structure of Overoxidation Product 19; POVchem Rendering;
Nitrogen and Oxygen Protecting Groups Are Omitted for Clarity
Upon heating dienophile 9 and diene 10 in benzene in a
sealed tube at 95 °C for 4 days, we were pleased to find that
the desired cycloadduct 14 could be isolated as the major
adduct (64%) along with the expected regioisomer 15 (15%)
(Scheme 4). However, the double bond migrates to regenerate
Scheme 4. Diels-Alder Reaction
the imidazolone ring under the conditions of the Diels-Alder
reaction. Stereochemical proof of the major cycloadduct was
based upon NMR studies including a critical GOESY
experiment17 that showed an NOE correlation between a
benzylic proton and Hc, which would only be possible in
regioisomer 14 (Scheme 4). Mosher ester analysis of Diels-
Alder adduct 14 indicated an enantiomeric excess of >95%.18
Structural confirmation of the minor Diels-Alder regioiso-
mer was secured by X-ray analysis.
Despite isomerization of the double bond in the Diels-
Alder reaction, we proceeded to study the viability of the
1,2-shift/ring-contraction sequence. We reasoned that ep-
oxidation of imidazolone 14 would furnish a rearranged
deschloro spirohydantoin analogous to 7. However, after silyl
protection of alcohol 14, treatment of imidazolone 16 with
m-CPBA rapidly (<5 min) led to what we initially believed
to be allylic alcohol 17 (Scheme 5). This structure was
quickly excluded since mass spectral analysis indicated the
incorporation of three oxygen atoms.
ylsilylbromide.19 This suggested the structure of the over-
oxidation product to be hemiacetal 18 (Scheme 5).
Our current mechanistic proposal for this overoxidation
involves an initial epoxidation of alkene 16 with m-CPBA,
followed by epoxide ring opening via presumed iminium ion
formation and deprotonation to give carbinol 17. A second
epoxidation/ring opening sequence was followed by a
proposed Baeyer-Villiger-type oxidation of the resulting
iminium intermediate.20 Furthermore, subsequent rearrange-
ment to the spirocyclic hydantoin 18 spontaneously ensued.
The stereochemistry of the quaternary center of 18 suggests
that epimerization of the proposed intermediate 17 occurs
under the acidic conditions of the epoxidation. We deter-
mined that epimerization at C4 occurs under the basic
conditions of the TBAF deprotection of lactol 18. While not
useful for our synthesis, the formation of this rearrangement
product did suggest the viability of the proposed 1,2-shift
leading to a spirocyclic hydantoin.
At this stage, we recognized the potential of alcohol 17
as an ideal substrate for the projected chlorination/rearrange-
ment sequence since it possesses an alkene in the desired
position and also provides the driving force of CdO bond
formation during the rearrangement. Ultimately, we were able
to generate alcohol 17 in a highly diastereoselective manner
and in high yield by careful treatment of imidazolone 16
with dimethyldioxirane (DMDO) at -45 °C. The structure
and stereochemical proof of carbinolurea 17 was provided
Although extensive spectral analysis was performed on
the overoxidation product, complete structure elucidation was
only possible following X-ray analysis of a derivative
obtained after deprotection and silylation with trityldimeth-
(12) Dienophile 9 was synthesized from (S)-pyroglutamic acid (five steps)
in analogy to reported procedures for related dienophiles; see: (a) Ohfune,
Y.; Tomita, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3511-3513. (b) Ackermann,
J.; Matthes, M.; Tamm, C. HelV. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 122-132.
(13) Current efforts are directed toward the presumed enantiomeric
tricyclic core structure in order to utilize the less expensive (S)-pyroglutamic
acid.
(14) Sauter, R.; Thomas, E. J.; Watts, J. P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1989, 519-523. See also ref 12b.
(15) (a) Cushing, T. D.; Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Williams, R. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 557-579. (b) Edmondson, S.; Danishefsky, S. J.;
Sepp-Lorenzino, L.; Rosen, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2147-2155.
(c) Ganesan, A.; Wang, H. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4685-4693.
(16) Baxter, R. L.; Camp, D. J.; Coutts, A.; Shaw, N. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 255-258.
(17) Stonehouse, J.; Adell, P.; Keeler, J.; Shaka, A. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 6037-6038.
(18) See Supporting Information for details.
(19) Ager, D. J.; Fleming, I. J. Chem. Res. 1977, 6-7.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 10, 2001
1537