(s), whose formation can be determined by the starting
chirality source (the chiral auxiliary or catalyst) or by the
stereocenter first created in the conjugate addition step.
As was previously mentioned, literature furnishes many
examples for asymmetric tandem transformations initiated
by a conjugate addition reaction, typically tandem conjugate
addition/aldol reactions. However, the number of examples
in which the intermediate enolate is trapped with an
alkylating reagent such as an alkyl halide is very scarce.4
Alkyl halides react very difficultly with the intermediate
enolate under the experimental conditions employed in the
conjugate addition step and usually require the addition of
an additive like HMPA in order to reach to acceptable yields.
Moreover, only activated alkylating reagents such as allyl
bromide or methyl iodide can usually be employed with good
results, which is a clear limitation of the methodologies
reported up to date.
In a recent work, we have shown that pseudoephedrine
can play the role of a very efficient chiral auxiliary in asym-
metric aza-Michael reactions.5 With this precedent in mind,
and taking into account that pseudoephedrine amide enolates
are reported to be excellent chiral nucleophiles in asymmetric
R-alkylation reactions,6 we decided to explore the viability
of (S,S)-(+)-pseudoephedrine as chiral auxiliary in stereo-
controlled tandem conjugate additions/alkylations.7 The high-
ly efficient conversion of the obtained adducts into enantio-
enriched R,â-branched alcohols will also be presented, show-
ing the remarkable synthetic potential of this methodology.
Our experiments began with the optimization of reaction
conditions for the conjugate addition of the carbon nucleo-
phile to R,â-unsaturated amide 1a (Scheme 1). After trying
several organometallic reagents under different reactions
Scheme 1
conditions, we found that addition of 2.0 equiv of PhLi to a
THF solution of 1a at -105 °C in the presence of 5 equiv
of LiCl furnished cleanly and in a very short time (10 min)
the desired conjugate addition product, with an excellent
degree of diastereoselection and with no traces of any 1,2-
addition byproduct. The absolute configuration of the newly
created stereogenic center was determined by chemical
correlation via hydrolysis of amide 2a to (R)-3-phenylbu-
tanoic acid.8
We determined that LiCl had to be present in the reaction
medium for the conjugate addition to proceed with such high
diastereoselectivity9 because it is known that pseudoephedine
amide enolates undergo R-alkylation in much faster way
when this salt is employed as an additive.10 Also, the use of
organolithium reagents should have a positive effect in the
alkylation step due to the higher reactivity exhibited by
lithium enolates. In fact, a problem associated with much of
the tandem processes reported so far is that organozinc or
Grignard reagents had to be used as nucleophiles in the
conjugate addition step, therefore generating an intermediate
zinc or magnesium enolate, which are known to exhibit
significantly lower reactivity in alkylation reactions.
Having established an optimal protocol for the conjugate
addition step, we proceeded next to examine the tandem
process (Scheme 2). When we treated the mixture of the
(4) Relevant examples of asymmetric conjugate addition of organome-
tallic reagents and subsequent R-alkylation: (a) Shintani, R.; Tokunaga,
N.; Doi, H.; Hayashi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 6240. (b) Arai, Y.;
Kasai, M.; Ueda, K.; Masaki, Y. Synthesis 2003, 1511. (c) Fleming, F. F.;
Wang, Q.; Steward, O. W. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4235. (d) Totani, K.;
Asano, S.; Takao, K.; Tadano, K. Synlett 2001, 1772. (e) Degrado, S. J.;
Mizutani, H.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 755. (f) Rawson,
D. J.; Meyers, A. I. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2292. (g) Tomioka, K.;
Kawasaki, H.; Koga, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3027. (h) Liebeskind,
L. S.; Welker, M. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 3079. For a tandem 1,4-
addition/Pd-catalyzed R-allylation, see: (i) Naasz, R.; Arnold, L. A.;
Pineschi, M.; Keller, E.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem: Soc. 1999, 121, 1104.
For a tandem radical conjugate addition/R-alkylation, see: (j) Sibi, M. P.;
He, L. Synlett. 2006, 689 and references therein.
Scheme 2
(5) Etxebarria, J.; Vicario, J. L.; Badia, D.; Carrillo, L.; Ruiz, N. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 8790.
(6) (a) Myers, A. G.; Yang, B. H.; Chen, H.; McKinstry, L.; Kopecky,
D. J.; Gleason, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6496. (b) Myers, A. G.;
Yang, B. H.; Chen, H.; Gleason, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9631.
(7) For the use of pseudoephedrine as chiral auxiliary, see the following.
Review: (a) Myers, A. G.; Charest, M. G. Handbook of Reagents for
Organic Synthesis: Chiral Reagents for Asymmetric Synthesis; Paquette,
L. A., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2003; p 485. See also: (b)
Vicario, J. L.; Rodriguez, M.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo, L.; Reyes, E. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 3171. (c) Hutchison, P. C.; Heightman, T. D.; Procter, D. J. J.
Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 790. (d) Smitrovich, J. H.; Boice, G. N.; Qu, C.;
DiMichele, L.; Nelson, T. D.; Huffman, M. A.; Murry, J.; McNamara, J.;
Reider, P. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1963. (e) Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.; Carrillo,
L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 745. (f) Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa; D.;
Carrillo, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 5801. (g) Vicario, J. L.; Bad´ıa, D.;
Carrillo, L. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 9030. (h) Keck, G. E.; Knutson, C. E.;
Wiles, S. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 707. (i) Guillena, G.; Najera, C.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 181. (j) Myers, A. G.; Barbay J. K.;
Zhong, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7207. (k) Nagula, G.; Huber, V.
J.; Lum, C.; Goodman, B. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3527. (l) Myers, A. G.;
McKinstry, L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 2428.
conjugate addition reaction with 1.2 equiv of MeI, warmed
it to 0 °C, and stirred at this temperature for 4 h, the expected
(8) The observed optical rotation for the sample prepared from amide
2a: [R]20D ) -42.3 (c ) 0.70, C6H6) was in agreement with the literature
data for (R)-3-phenylbutanoic acid: [R]20 ) -45.8 (c ) 0.77, C6H6).
D
Suzuki, I.; Kin, H.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10139.
(9) When the conjugate addition reaction was carried out in the absence
of LiCl an important decrease in the diastereoselectivity was observed in
all cases studied. It is known that LiCl addition significantly impacts
stereoselectivity in the Michael reaction of pseudoephedrine amide eno-
lates: Smitrovich, J. H.; DiMichele, L.; Qu, C.; Boice, G. N.; Nelson, T.
D.; Huffman, M. A.; Murry, J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 1903.
(10) For the influence of LiCl in the reactivity of pseudoephedrine
enolates, see refs 6 and 9. See also: (a) Ru¨ck, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1995, 34, 433. (b) Henderson, K. W.; Dorigo, A. E.; Liu, Q.-Y.;
Williard, P. G.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Bernstein, P. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 1339 and references therein.
2536
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 12, 2006