868
B. W. Trotter et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 865–869
Table 6. Inhibition of HDJ-2 and K-Ras processing in PSN-1 cellsa
Acknowledgements
Compound
GGTIb
(nM)
HDJ-2
EC50 (nM)c
K-Ras
EC50 (nM)d
The authors would like to thank K. D. Anderson, P. A.
Ciecko-Steck, A. B. Coddington, G. M. Smith, H. G.
Ramjit, C. W. Ross, III, B.-L. Wan, and M. M. Zrada
for analytical support.
22b
22b
CCFTIa
CCFTIa
0
100
0
1980
1000
2.3
>30,000
1800
>3000
78
100
—
aSee ref 26.
References and Notes
bN-(1-Adamantyl)-4-{(1-(4-cyanobenzyl)-1H-imidazol-5-yl)-methyl}-
piperazine-1-carboxamide, compound 1 in ref 14.
cSee ref 24 (assay duration was 24 h).
1. Dinsmore, C. J. Curr. Opin. Oncol. Endocr. Metabol. Invest.
Drugs 2000, 2, 26.
2. Oliff, A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999, C19, 1423.
3. (a) Hill, B. T.; Perrin, D.; Kruczynski, A. Crit. Rev. Oncol.
Hematol. 2000, 33, 7. (b) Prendergast, G. C. Curr. Opin. Cell
Biol. 2000, 12, 166.
dConcentration of compound required to inhibit prenylation of K-Ras
in PSN-1 cells during a 24 h period by 50% (assay conditions analo-
gous to ref 24).
4. Zhang, F. L.; Kirschmeier, P.; Carr, D.; James, L.; Bond,
R. W.; Wang, L.; Patton, R.; Windsor, W. T.; Syto, R.;
Zhang, R.; Bishop, R. W. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 10232.
5. Lebowitz, P. F.; Prendergast, G. C. Oncogene 1998, 17, 1439.
6. (a) Zujewski, J.; Horak, I. D.; Bol, C. J. J. G.; Woes-
tenborghs, R.; End, D.; Chiao, J.; Belly, R. T.; Kohler, D.;
Chow, C.; Noone, M.; Hakim, F. T.; Larkin, G.; Gress, R. E.;
Nussenblatt, R. B.; Kremer, A. B.; Cowan, K. H. American
Society of Clinical Oncology 35th Annual Meeting. Atlanta,
GA, 1999. (b) Adjei, A. A.; Erlichman, C.; Davis, J. N.;
Cutler, D. L.; Sloan, J. A.; Marks, R. S.; Hanson, L. J.; Svin-
gen, P. A.; Atherton, P.; Bishop, W. R.; Kirschmeier, P.;
Kaufmann, S. H. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 1871.
7. Leonard, D. M.; Shuler, K. R.; Poulter, C. J.; Eaton, S. R.;
Sawyer, T. K.; Hodges, J. C.; Su, T.-Z.; Scholten, J. D.;
Gowan, R. C.; Sebolt-Leopold, J. S.; Doherty, A. M. J. Med.
Chem. 1997, 40, 192.
8. Gibbs, B. S.; Zahn, T. J.; Mu, Y.; Sebolt-Leopold, J. S.;
Gibbs, R. A. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3800.
farnesylation of the FPTase substrate HDJ-223 in PSN-
1
cells with approximately equal potency (EC50
22a=1064 nM, EC50 22b=1332 nM).24
Given the ability of these compounds to inhibit
protein prenylation in cells, an experiment was designed
to investigate the possibility of protein substrate-inde-
pendent inhibition of FPTase by 22b. We chose to
compare inhibition of HDJ-2 processing with that of
K-Ras. Inhibition of K-Ras farnesylation by protein-
competitive inhibitors is generally weaker than inhi-
bition observed for other FPTase substrates due to
the high affinity of FPTase for K-Ras.4 However, an
FPP-competitive inhibitor such as 22b might inhibit
farnesylation of K-Ras and other substrates with equal
potency.
9. (a) Yonemoto, M.; Satoh, T.; Arakawa, H.; Suzuki-Taka-
hashi, I.; Moden, Y.; Kodera, T.; Tanaka, K.; Aoyama, T.;
Iwasawa, Y.; Kamei, T.; Nishimura, S.; Tomimoto, K. Mol.
Pharmacol. 1998, 54, 1. (b) Tahir, S. K.; Gu, W. Z.; Zhang, H. C.;
Leal, J.; Lee, J. Y.; Kovar, P.; Saeed, B.; Cherian, S. P.; Devine,
E.; Cohen, J.; Warner, R.; Wang, Y. C.; Stout, D.; Arendsen,
D. L.; R osenberg, S.; Ng, S. C.Eur. J. Cancer 2000, 36, 1161.
10. For the synthesis and evaluation of related 2-arylindole-3-
acetamides as mDRC ligands and a discussion of the con-
formational properties of these molecules, see: Kozikowski,
A. P.; Ma, D.; Brewer, J.; Sun, S.; Costa, E.; Romeo, E.;
Guidotti, A. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 2908.
11. The anion survey was performed for 22b. The rank order of
anion effects (from lowest observed IC50 to highest) was: dithio-
phosphate (ca. 30-fold reduction in IC50 at 5 mM)<ATP<thio-
sulfate<phosphate<sulfateꢀglycerophosphate (ca. 3-fold
reduction in IC50 at 5 mM).
12. Researchers at Parke-Davis have observed similar effects
in a peptidic series of FPP-competitive FTIs and have pre-
sented evidence that ATP and other anions mimic the phos-
phate group of FPP, thereby enhancing the binding of FPP-
competitive inhibitors that do not otherwise occupy the phos-
phate binding region. See: Scholten, J. D.; Zimmerman, K.;
Oxender, M.; Sebolt-Leopold, J.; Gowan, R.; Leonard, D.;
Hupe, D. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1996, 4, 1537.
13. Graham, S. L.; deSolms, S. J.; Giuliani, E. A.; Kohl, N. E.;
Mosser, S. D.; Oliff, A. I.; Pompliano, D. L.; Rands, E.; Bre-
slin, M. J.; Deana, A. A.; Garsky, V. M.; Scholz, T. H.; Gibbs,
J. B.; Smith, R. L. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 725.
Complicating a direct comparison of HDJ-2 and K-Ras
processing in cell culture is the fact that, while HDJ-2 is
prenylated only by FPTase, K-Ras is a substrate for
both FPTase and GGPTase-I and can therefore be
alternatively geranylgeranylated by GGPTase-I when
FPTase activity is inhibited.25 Thus, 22b alone does
not inhibit processing of K-Ras (EC50 >30,000 nM,
Table 6). However, when geranylgeranylation is
suppressed by addition of a selective GGPTase-I inhi-
bitor (GGTI, GGPTase-I IC50 0.2 nM, FPTase IC50
517 nM),14 22b inhibits K-Ras processing with approxi-
mately the same potency as it does HDJ-2 pro-
cessing (Table 6). In contrast, a Ca1a2X-competitive
FPTase inhibitor (CCFTI, FPTase IC50 0.1 nM,
GGPTase-I IC50 300 nM)26 is 30-fold less potent
against K-Ras than against HDJ-2 under the same
conditions.
In conclusion, FPP-competitive farnesyltransferase
inhibitors which are neither peptidomimetics nor farne-
sylpyrophosphate mimics have been identified. The 2-
arylindole-3-acetamides surveyed here are selective for
FPTase over the related enzyme GGPTase-I and appear
to inhibit protein farnesylation in a protein substrate-
independent manner. As our understanding of the cel-
lular consequences of FPTase inhibition continues to
evolve, this structurally unique class of FTIs may prove
valuable. A more detailed examination of the biological
effects of these compounds awaits the preparation of
analogues with improved cell activity.
14. Huber, H. E.; Abrams, M.; Anthony, N.; Graham, S.;
Hartman, G.; Lobell, R.; Lumma, W.; Nahas, D.; Robinson,
R.; Sisko, J.; Heimbrook, D. C. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res.
2000, 41, Abstract 2838.