5552 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2007, Vol. 50, No. 23
Table 2. PK Profile and in Vivo Activity of Selected Compounds
Letters
24) and 5.1 (95% confidence interval of 0.9-28.2) mg/kg.
Compounds 23h and 23i also showed significant activity at dose
of 10 mg/kg (the ED50 values were not determined).
AUC0-6h
Tmax
Cmax
rat SNL
rat SNL
compd
(nM‚h)a
(h)a
(nM)a
PWT (g)b
MPE (%)b
In summary, using heterocycles as surrogates for the meta-
bolically labile dimethylamino group of the lead 5, we have
succeeded in the identification of three distinctive types of
tetracyclic mGluR1 antagonists, namely, indoles 11a-c, imi-
dazole 14a, and morpholine analogues 23a-i. Among them,
especially remarkable are the mopholine analogues with im-
proved pharmacokinetic profiles (23h and 23i) and excellent
in vivo activity in rat SNL model (23c and 23e). The high
potency and subtype selectivities, combined with pronounced
oral efficacy, rendered these mGluR1 antagonists valuable tools
for in vivo proof of principle animal studies in neuropathic pain.
Further investigation will be reported in due course.
5
1927
35
18
1325
77
1563
366
8434
5187
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
1
2
1
2
0.5
564
71
37
394
70
467
198
2046
1425
13.2 ( 1.3
87 ( 9
11a
11b
11c
23a
23c
23e
23h
23i
6.6 ( 2.3
39 ( 16
8.5 ( 1.6
11.8 ( 1.6
7.7 ( 1.5
10.9 ( 1.6
50 ( 12
73 ( 13
44 ( 12
68 ( 12
a Data are from pooled samples from two rats (n ) 2, dosed at 10 mg/
kg, po) in cassette-accelerated rapid rat protocol as described in ref 18.
b Data are the mean ( SE from 8 to 10 rats dosed at 10 mg/kg, po, and
they are expressed as paw withdrawal threshold (PWT, g). MPE (maximal
percentage of effect) was also reported. For all experimental details see ref
19.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Dr. Deen Tulshian and
Dr. John Hunter for their support and helpful discussions. We
gratefully acknowledge Lisa Broske’s group for animal dosing
and Sam Wainhaus’ group for the PK sample analysis. We thank
Dr. Birendra Pramanik’s group and Dr. Tse-Ming Chan’s group
for analytical support, and Dr. Jesse Wong, Dr. Xian Liang,
and Yan Jin for scale-up of some key intermediates. We also
thank Robert Budich for the nomenclature of all the compounds.
tetracycles. Therefore, we switched our attention to nonaromatic
six-membered ring systems as exemplified by 23a-i. Initially,
morpholine analogue 23a was found to be a very potent mGluR1
antagonist (IC50 ) 2.2 nM). Further isosteric replacement of
4-Me of the right-hand phenyl ring with 4-Cl and 4-MeO
generated 23c and 23e, with approximately equal potency
against mGlu1 receptors. Anticipating that substituents on the
morpholine ring would attenuate potential metabolism of the
methylene sites and also reduce the π-stacking, we next prepared
four methyl-substituted analogues 23f-i from commercially
available enantiomerically pure amino alcohols. As shown in
Table 1, 3-Me substituted analogues 23h and 23i were more
potent than their 2-Me countparts 23f and 22g, respectively;
for 2-Me and 3-Me substituted series, the R-isomers (23g, 23i)
were 2-fold more potent than their corresponding â-isomers (23f,
23h). We also examined two 3(R)-Me substituted analogues 23b
and 23d, both of which showed single-digit nanomolar human
mGluR1 potency. It is noteworthy that most of the morpholine
analogues exhibited subnanomolar Ki values against rat mGlu1
receptors. As shown in Table 1, all the tetracycles demonstrated
high selectivity against human mGlu5 receptors.
Note Added after ASAP Publication. This manuscript was
released ASAP on October 11, 2007 with errors in Table 1.
The correct version was posted on October 16, 2007.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) Nakanishi, S.; Masu, M. Molecular diversity and functions of
glutamate receptors. Annu. ReV. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1994, 23,
319-348. (b) Hermans, E.; Challiss, R. A. J. structural, signaling
and regulatory properties of the group I metabotropic glutamate
receptors: protypic family C G-protein-coupled receptors. Biochem.
J. 2001, 359, 465-484.
(2) (a) Schoepp, D. D.; Jane, D. E.; Monn, J. A. Pharmacological agents
acting at subtypes of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neurophar-
macology 1999, 38, 1431-1476. (b) Han, J. S.; Neugebauer, V.
mGluR1 and mGluR5 antagonists in the amygdale inhibit different
components of audible and ultrasonic vocalizations in a model of
arthritic pain. Pain 2005, 113, 211-222.
(3) (a) Bhave, G.; Karim, F.; Carlton, S. M.; Gereau, R. W., IV.
Peripheral group I metabotropic glutamate receptors modulate
nociception in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2001, 4, 417-423. (b) Dolan,
S.; Nolan, A. M. Neuropharmacology 2002, 43, 319-326. (c) Dolan,
S.; Kelly, J. G.; Monteiro, A. M.; Nolan, A. M. Pain 2003, 106,
501-512. (d) Young, M. R.; Fleetwood-Walker, S. M.; Mitchell,
R.; Munro, F. E. Evidence for a role of metabotropic glutamate
receptors in sustained nociceptive inputs to rat dorsal horn neurons.
Neuropharmacology 1994, 33, 141-144. (e) Young, M. R.; Fleet-
wood-Walker, S. M.; Dickinson, T.; Blackburn-Munro, G.; Sparrow,
H.; Birch, P. J.; Bountra, C. Behavoiral and electrophysiological
evidence supporting a role for group I metabotropic glutamate
receptors in the mediation of nociceptive inputs to the rat spinal cord.
Brain Res. 1997, 777, 161-169.
(4) Neugebauer, V. Peripheral metabotropic glutamate receptors: fight
the pain where it hurts. Trends Neurosci. 2001, 24, 550-552.
(5) (a) Neugebauer, V.; Carlton, S. M. Peripheral metabotropic glutamate
receptors as drug targets for pain relief. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets
2002, 6, 349-361. (b) Swanson, C. J.; Bures, M.; Johnson, M. P.;
Linden, A.-M.; Monn, J. A.; Schoepp, D. D. Metobotropic glutamate
receptors as novel targets for anxiety and stress disorders. Nat. ReV.
Drug DiscoVery 2005, 4, 131-144.
(6) (a) Ambler, S. J.; Baker, S. R.; Clark, B. P.; Coleman, D. S.;
Foglesong, R. J.; Goldsworthy, J. Jagdmann, G. K., Jr.; Johnson, K.
W.; Kingston, A. E.; Owton, W. M.; Schoepp, D. D.; Hong, J. E.;
Schkeryantz, J. M.; Vannieuwenhze, M. S.; Zia-ebrahimi, M. S.
Preparation of heterocycles containing a 4-substituted pyrimidine
subunit for pharmaceutical use as mGluR1 antagonists. WO
2001032632, 2001. (b) Itahana, H.; Fujisayu, J.; Watanabe, T.; Okada,
Having achieved potent and selective mGluR1 anatagonists,
we chose several compounds for pharmacokinetic (PK) inves-
tigations in rats.18 The PK profiles are exhibited in Table 2.
To improve the overall pharmacokinetic properties, we aimed
to eliminate the metabolically unstable dimethylamino substitu-
ent. As shown in Table 2, the area under curves (AUCs) of
pyrrolo compounds 11a and 11b, free of the dimethylamino
groups, were very low, likely results of their poor absorption.
Compound 11c, bearing a polar p-MeO phenyl group, had
moderate plasma AUC. The AUC of morpholine 23a did not
improve, consistent with observation of the PK of other
analogues bearing a p-tolyl substituent (data not shown here).
However, 23c and 23e displayed improved AUCs compared to
23a.
As expected, introduction of methyl substituents on the
morpholine ring, such as 23h and 23i, conferred an advantage
over their parent 23e. The significantly improved AUCs may
be attributed, at least partially, to less metabolism and/or better
absorption. In contrast to the flat five-membered counterparts,
these morpholine rings are not aromatic and cannot be metabo-
lized to aromatics. As a result, the morpholine analogues have
less π-stacking and thereby greater water solubility.
Compounds 11c and 23c,e,h,i) have been chosen for further
study in the rat spinal nerve ligation neuropathic pain model
(SNL model).19 While 11c exhibited modest in vivo potency in
SNL (39% reversal at 10 mg/kg), 23c and 23e demonstrated
strong activity, with ED50 of 8 (95% confidence interval of 2.6-