D. Ellis et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 4246–4251
4247
R
Cl
O
Cl
CN
Cl
CN
a
b
NH
NH
NH2
PMB
PMB
7
6
5
c
R
R
R
Cl
CO2Et
O
Cl
CO2Et
CO2Et
Cl
e
d
N
N
O
N
O
H
PMB
PMB
4
9
8
4a:
4b:
4c:
4d:
4e:
4f:
4i:
R = Me
R = Et
R = nPr
R = nBu
R = (CH2)2CHCH2
R = nPent
R = (CH2)5CH3
R = iPr
R = CH2CH(CH3)2
R = CH2Ph
R = (CH2)2Ph
R = cPr
R = cPentyl
R = cHexyl
4j:
4k:
4l:
4m:
4o:
4p:
4g:
4h:
R = 4-PhPh
Scheme 1. Synthesis of quinolones 4a–4p. Reagents and conditions: (a) PMBOH (1.5 equiv), p-TsOH (cat.), CH3CN, 70 °C, 12 h, 99%; (b) RMgCl
(2.0 equiv), THF, 0–25 °C, 1 h, 75–92%; (c) ClCOCH2CO2Et (2.0 equiv), benzene, 80 °C, 4 h, 73–88%; (d) (CH3)2SOCH3I (2.0 equiv), NaH (3.0
equiv), DMSO, 0–90 °C, 51–78%; (e) CAN (2.0 equiv), CH3CN/H2O = 9:1, 0–25 °C, 12 h, 74–90%.
amino group was first protected with a PMB group, and
the nitrile was then converted into a ketone by reacting
with various Grignard regents. Treatment of the result-
ing ketone with ethyl chlorocarbonylacetate led to the
formation of the quinolone core 8. The cyclopropane
moiety was installed by reacting with dimethyloxosulfo-
nium methylide.14 Removal of the PMB group gave rise
to quinolones 4a–4p. These quinolones were tested
against the WT HIV-1 virus, and their antiviral activities
are shown in Table 1. As suggested by molecular model-
ing studies, a number of these quinolones exhibited po-
tent antiviral activity, and a clear SAR emerged. The R
group prefers straight aliphatic chains, and the best R
groups are n-butyl (4d), n-4-pentenyl (4e), and n-pentyl
(4f), and all three compounds exhibited low single digit
nanomolar potency. Either longer or shorter R groups
resulted in reduced activity (4a–4c, 4g). With the excep-
tion for the i-butyl analog 4i and phenethyl analog 4k,
all other quinolones with branched alkyl, phenyl alkyl
or phenyl groups (4h, 4j, and 4l–4p) showed poor antivi-
ral activity. These data are consistent with the modeling
studies, which suggest a narrow hydrophobic pocket in
the enzyme which can interact with this region of the
molecule (Fig. 2).
the final products 13 and 14, respectively. Antiviral
testing indicated that both 13 and 14 lost activity sig-
nificantly, representing more than a 60- and 30-fold
reduction in potency, respectively (Table 1). These
data demonstrate the important role of the ester moi-
ety in the interaction with the enzyme, as well as the
cyclopropane moiety in anchoring the molecule for
optimal interactions.
To further explore the SAR in the ester region, a li-
brary of esters and amides (16a–16y) were prepared
via the corresponding acid intermediate 15 (Scheme
3). Biological testing suggested that small esters are
preferred with the methyl (16a) and allyl (16b) esters
being among the most potent. The slightly larger es-
ters, cyanoethyl (16c), isobutenyl (16d), and phenyl
analogs (16e–16f), suffered a dramatic loss in antiviral
activity. In the case of 16c, the polar nitrile moiety
could have resulted in unfavorable interactions with
the enzyme. Replacement of the ethyl ester with a pri-
mary amide still gave a potent inhibitor (16g),
although it suffered some loss of activity.
Consistent with the observations in the ester series, all
tertiary amides, phenyl and pyridyl amides (16q–16y),
showed significantly less activity. Only the 3-cyanophe-
nyl analog 16t displayed good antiviral potency
(160 nM). The activity difference between 16s and 16t
could be the result of the steric interactions of the ortho
nitrile group in 16s with the quinolone core that led to
less favorable interactions with the enzyme. As the com-
pounds were tested in a cell-based assay, different cell
permeability of these analogs might have played a role
in their reduced antiviral activity.
To explore the role of the ethyl ester moiety, a nitrile
analog 13 was prepared (Scheme 2). Ketone 7d was
first converted into the corresponding cyanoquinolone
10 in excellent yield by reacting with cyanoacetyl chlo-
ride. Treatment of 10 with dimethyloxosulfonium
methylide led to the isolation of the desired cyclopro-
pane analog 11. In addition to 11, another product
was isolated, which had a molecular weight of 14
mass units more than that of 11. Spectroscopic studies
established its structure as a cyclobutane analog 12,
which was likely due to the reaction of 11 with an
additional equivalent of dimethyloxosulfonium methy-
lide. Removal of the PMB groups in 11 and 12 led to
Alcohol 19a and ethers 19b–19e were also prepared to
further understand the SAR in this region (Scheme 4).
Ester 9d was first selectively reduced to alcohol 17,