10.1002/ejoc.201701480
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
COMMUNICATION
Introducing a substituent on the aryl ring of the nitrostyrene
affected the enantioselectivities significantly. Performing the
reaction with 4-methylphenyl-nitrostyrene (10b), ergoline
derivative 12d-b was formed in 55% yield and in an ee of 62%
(entry 2), while nitrostyrene 10c, bearing a para-chlorophenyl
afforded 12d-c in 48% yield and 68% ee (entry 3). Having a para-
methoxy substituent on the aryl ring as in styrene 10d was not
beneficial as product 12d-d was isolated in 42% yield, while the
ee of the major enantiomeric pair was 44% (entry 4). Contrary to
the para-substituted aryl nitrostyrenes, meta-substituted styrenes,
gave better enantioselectivities. Reacting meta-chlorophenyl
nitrostyrene (10e) with indole 9d, ergoline derivative 12d-e was
isolated in 50% yield and 84% ee. Replacing the chlorine with
bromine in nitrostyrene 10f afforded 12d-f in 49% yield and 75%
ee.
in acetic acid and MeOH. Reduction of the nitro group was
followed by direct attack on the ester functionality and the desired
lactam 15 was formed in one pot in 61% yield.
In conclusion, we have developed a short and facile
stereoselective synthesis of ergoline derivatives, by employing a
one-pot/two-step Friedel-Crafts/Michael addition sequence. In
addition, we were able to introduce, for the first time, variable
substituents at the C4-position of the ergoline scaffold, a feature
that opens possibilities of producing a broad range of new
interesting ergoline analogues. Furthermore, we could control the
3 chiral centers formed in one step, by employing a bisoxazoline
ligand with an optimal ee value of 99%. Finally, our approach is
complementary to Bernardi’s and makes this sequence suitable
for the fast creation of a library of ergoline analogues to be used
for biological evaluation.
Table 2. Substrate Scope
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge award of a Postdoctoral scholarship for C.D.
funded by Higher Education Authority’s PRTLI Cycle 4 and
Science Foundation Ireland for a postdoctoral fellowship for V.C.
and a PhD scholarship for S.McK. (054/RFP4/CHE/0075). This
publication has also emanated from research conducted (RC)
with the financial support of the Synthesis and Solid State
Pharmaceutical Centre, funded by Science Foundation Ireland
(SFI) under Grant No. 12\RC\2275) and is co-funded under the
European Regional Development Fund under Grant
Number 14/SP/2750. We acknowledge facilities provided by the
Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology (CSCB) funded by the
Higher Education Authority’s PRTLI. We thank Dr Yannick Ortin
(NMR spectroscopy), Dr Jimmy Muldoon and Kevin Conboy
(mass spectrometry) and Ms Ann Connolly (microanalysis) for
technical support.
Entry
Ar
Ph
Tol
10
12d
Yield
53
ee[a]
99 (A2)
62
1
2
10a
10b
12d-a-A
12d-b
55
3
4
5
6
p-Cl-C6H4
p-OMe-C6H4
m-Cl-C6H4
m-Br-C6H4
10c
10d
10e
10f
12d-c
12d-d
12d-e
12d-f
48
42
50
49
68
44
84
75
Keywords: Ergolines • Asymmetric Synthesis • Friedel-Crafts
Alkylation • Michael Addition
[a] The major enantiomer was determined by comparison of
11a with Du’s reported results in Chem. Asian J. 2008, 3, 1111.
[1]
[2]
Mantegani, S.; Brambilla, E.; Varasi, M. Il Farmaco 1999, 54, 288
S.; Mapelli, E.; Alpegiani, M.; Paissoni, P. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2006,
10, 198.
Finally, in order to form the fourth ring of the ergoline skeleton, we
reduced the nitro moiety to the amine (Scheme 6). This
transformation was achieved by treating 12d-a with zinc powder
[3]
(a) The Merck Index, 12th ed.; Merck and Co., Inc.:Whitehouse Station,
NY, 1996; pp 231. (b) Somei, M.; Yokoyama, Y.; Murakami, Y.; Ninomiya,
I.; Kiguchi, T.; Naito, T. In The Alkaloids; Cordell, G. A., Ed.; Academic
Press: San Diego, CA, 2000; Vol. 54, pp 191-257. (c) Pezzoli, G.;
Martignoni, E.; Pacchetti, C.; Angeleri, V.; Lamberti, P.; Muratorio, A.;
Bonuccelli, U.; Mari, M. D.; Foschi, N.; Cossutta, E. Neurology 1995, 45
(3), S22. (d) Misner, J. W.; Kennedy, J. H.; Biggs, W. S. Org. Process.
Res. Dev. 1997, 1, 77.
[4]
(a) Bennett, J. W.; Klich, M. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 16, 497. (b)
Kornfeld, E. C.; Fornefeld, E. J.; Kline, G. B.; Mann, M. J.; Jones, R. G.;
Woodward, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 5256. (c) Kornfeld, E. C.;
Fornefeld, E. J.; Kline, G. B.; Mann, M. J.; Morrison, D. E.; Jones, R. G.;
Woodward, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 3087. (d) Padwa, A.; Bur,
S. K.; Zhang, H. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 6833. (e) Julia, M.; Le Goffic,
F.; Igolen, J.; Baillarge, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 10, 1569. (f)
Armstrong, V. W.; Coulton, S.; Ramage, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17,
4311. (g) Oppolzer, W.; Francotte, E.; Battig, K. Helv. Chim. Acta 1981,
64, 478. (h) Rebek, J.; Tai, D. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 859. (i)
Scheme 6. One Pot Nitro-Reduction and Lactamisation, Leading to 4-Ring
Ergoline Derivative 15.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.