Q.-B. Liu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 47 (2006) 4733–4736
4735
Nevertheless, the corresponding product was success-
fully obtained at reflux when a higher boiling point sol-
vent 1,2-dichloroethane was used in the presence of 4,5-
dichloroimidazole. The products namely, phosphinites 3
can be isolated by column chromatography under nitro-
gen in over 50% yields. However, these compounds are
not stable, therefore, the reaction mixtures were sub-
jected to a flash chromatography through a degassed sil-
ica gel in order to remove some impurities and directly
used for the next step. The corresponding iridium com-
plexes were made by a slightly modified standard litera-
ture procedure, and the resulting complexes are air
stable foaming orange to red solid, which can be conve-
niently purified by chromatography.
ligands with (o-Tol)2P group was slightly superior to that
of the corresponding ligands with Ph2P group. Among
the iridium complexes, the highest ee value (99%) was
obtained with catalyst 11f, which has a p-methylphenyl
group on pyridine ring. It is noteworthy that the enantio-
selectivity with ligands 3 was comparable to that
achieved with other chiral N,P ligands.2 We have tested
other two substrates ethyl 2-methylcinnamate 14 and
allylic alcohol 15 with catalyst 11, good enantioselectiv-
ities (88% ee and 86% ee) were also obtained,
respectively.
In conclusion, we have developed a new class of modu-
lar conformationally rigid N,P-ligands for iridium-cata-
lyzed asymmetric hydrogenation. Excellent reactivities
and enantioselectivities were obtained in the hydrogena-
tion of aryl alkenes. Further studies on optimized syn-
thesis of the ligand and application to other
asymmetric reactions are underway.
Hydrogenation of (E)-1,2-diphenylpropene 12 was cho-
sen as a model reaction to test potential catalysts. The
hydrogenations were carried out at room temperature
under 50 bar of hydrogen pressure using CH2Cl2 as
the solvent. In this system, the selectivity and reaction
reactivity were dependent on catalyst structure (Table
1). Firstly, for cyclopentanone derived catalysts (11a–
h), excellent reactivity was observed except for 11b.
The enantioselectivity increased from 86% ee (R = H)
to 98% ee (R = Ph) when the bulk of R group increased.
The similar enantioselectivity was obtained when aryl
group changed from electron-withdrawing group p-
CF3C6H4 to electron-donating p-CH3C6H4. Secondly,
upon the changing from five-member-ring to a six-mem-
ber-ring derivative, the selectivity and reactivity of cata-
lyst lowered significantly (entry 9 vs entry 3 and entry 10
vs entry 4). Thirdly, the enantioselectivities of the
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the financial support from National
Science Foundation of China (20532050) and Talent
Scientist Program, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
Table 1. Iridium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of (E)-1,2-
diphenylpropene 12
References and notes
catalyst 11 (0.5 mol%)
1. Brown, J. M. In Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis;
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.;
Springer: Berlin, 1999; Vol. 1, pp 121–182.
CH2Cl2, 50 bar H2, RT, 16 h
12
Entry
13
2. (a) Lightfoot, A.; Schnider, P.; Pfaltz, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2897–2899; (b) Blankenstein, J.; Pfaltz,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4445–4447; (c)
Menges, F.; Neuburger, M.; Pfaltz, A. Org. Lett. 2002,
4, 4713–4716; (d) Durry, W. J., III; Zimmerman, N.;
Keenan, M.; Hayashi, M.; Kaiser, S.; Goddard, R.; Pfaltz,
A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 70–74; (e) Perry, M.
C.; Cui, X.; Powell, M.; Hou, D.; Reibenspies, J.; Burgess,
K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 113–123; (f) Tang, W.;
Wang, W.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42,
943–946; (g) Xu, G.; Gilberston, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
2003, 44, 953–955; (h) Powell, M. T.; Hou, D.-R.; Perry,
M. C.; Cui, X.; Burgess, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
8878–8879; (i) Bunlaksananurson, T.; Polborn, K.; Kno-
chel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3941–3943; (j)
Schenkel, L. B.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
1800–1802; (k) Ka¨llstro¨m, K.; Hedberg, C.; Brandt, P.;
Bayer, A.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
14308–14309; (l) Hedberg, C.; Ka¨llstro¨m, K.; Brandt, P.;
Hansen, L. K.; Andersson, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 2995–3001; For a recent review see: (m) Ka¨llstro¨m,
K.; Munslow, I.; Andersson, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12,
3194–3200; and Cui, X.; Burgess, K. Chem. Rev. 2005,
105, 3272–3296.
Catalyst
Conv (%)a
ee (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11a
11b
11c
11d
11e
11f
11g
11h
11i
>99
83
86 (R)
95 (R)
98 (R)
98 (R)
98 (R)
99 (R)
98 (R)
97 (R)
86 (R)
89 (R)
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
32
10
11j
85
a
The conversion was calculated based on the ratio of methyl group by
1H NMR.
b Ee was measured by HPLC and absolute configuration of the
product was determined by comparison of the sign of the optical
rotation to reported data.
CO2Et
OH
15
14
11f: 88% ee, >99%
11g: 86% ee, >99%
3. Crabtree, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 331–338.