Ribas et al.
been performed on discrete copper(II) complexes bearing two
axially coordinated PTMMC (monocarboxylated para-
substituted PTM radical), showing three unpaired antiferro-
magnetically coupled (2J/KB ) -30 to -50 K) spins.9
Furthermore, via the use of crystal engineering strategies on
different PTM derivatives, a metal-organic nanoporous
structure combining CuII ions and the PTMTC radical
(tricarboxylated para-substituted PTM radical) was synthe-
sized and described as a magnetic sponge with bulk magnetic
ordering and with promising potential for application as a
magnetic sensor.10
It is in this context that we decided to explore the
substitution of the carboxylic functional group (-COOH)
by a sulfonic group (-SO3H) in the PTM radicals to
investigate its potential use as a magnetically active building
block for metal-organic coordination compounds. Herein,
we report the synthesis of the PTM-SO3H radical and the
coordinative possibilities of the deprotonated sulfonic group
in its use as a magnetically active organic ligand. Although
the sulfonate anion is generally considered to be a poor
ligand,11 with many examples of weakly interacting or
noninteracting sulfonates found in the literature,12 there is
an increasing interest in the exploration of the sulfonate group
as an efficient ligand for metals to form metal-organic
layered structures,13 as an analogy to the metal-phosphonate
structures.14 In general, the sulfonate group cannot displace
H2O molecules from the primary coordination sphere of the
metal. However, alkali ions, large alkaline earth ions, and
Ag(I) ions have been shown to be exceptions to the general
trend.13 The difference seems to rely on the nonpreferences
for a coordination number or geometry. Indeed, the coopera-
tive interactions in the formation of extended structures such
as AgPhSO3, AgOTs, and Ag(4-pyridinesulfonate) were
reported to be responsible for the robustness of these
structures, with thermal stabilities higher than 300 °C.15 The
cooperative interactions have been attributed to the spherical
trioxy anionic sulfonate groups because they allow multiple
connectivities to the metal centers.16 With these bibliographic
precedents, we have explored, for the first time, the
coordination capabilities of a stable organic radical bearing
a sulfonate group, and two examples with a nonparamagnetic
alkaline metal ion and a paramagnetic transition metal ion
such as CuII are presented. In the latter compound, we will
demonstrate that a solvent-separated ion pair (SSIP) situation
in the structure precludes magnetic communication between
the two distinct magnetic centers. We will also show that it
is possible to force direct coordination of the sulfonate group
to the copper center and discuss the magnetic consequences.
Experimental Section
Materials. Solvents of reagent grade quality supplied by SDS
were dried before use with a standard method and stored under
Ar. Reagents were obtained commercially from Aldrich and used
without further purification.
Elemental analyses were performed by SA-UAB (Servei
d’Ana`lisi-Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona). UV-vis-NIR
spectra were recorded on a Varian Cary 5 spectrophotometer. IR
spectra were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One spectro-
photometer using KBr pellets. Cyclic voltammetry experiments were
carried out at room temperature with an EG&G (PAR263A)
potentiostat-galvanostat in a normal three-electrode cell (Ag/Ag+
reference) with Pt wires as working and auxiliary electrodes.
Distilled and argon-degassed methanol or acetonitrile were used
as solvents with 0.1 M (nBu4N)+PF6- as supporting electrolyte (scan
rate ) 100 mV s-1). Thermogravimetric analyses were performed
under argon with a high sensitivity Perkin-Elmer TGA7 balance.
(4) (a) Minguet, M.; Luneau, D.; Lhotel, E.; Vincent Villar, Paulsen, C.;
Amabilino, D. B.; Veciana, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 586-
589. (b) Vostrikova, K. E.; Luneau, D.; Wernsdorfer, W.; Rey, P.;
Verdaguer, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 718-719. (c) Oshio,
H.; Ito, T. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2000, 198, 329-346. (d) Marvilliers,
A.; Pei, Y.; Cano, J.; Vostrikova, K. E.; Paulsen, C.; Rivie`re, E.;
Audie`re, J.-P.; Mallah, T. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1951-1952. (e)
Field, L. M.; Lahti, P. M.; Palacio, F. Chem. Commun. 2002, 636-
637. (f) Stroh, G.; Turek, P.; Rabu, P.; Ziessel, R. Inorg. Chem. 2001,
21, 5334-5342. (g) Min, K. S.; Rhinegold, A. L.; Miller, J. S. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 44, 8433-8441.
(5) Ballester, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 12, 380-387.
(6) (a) Maspoch, D.; Gerbier, P.; Catala, L.; Vidal-Gancedo, J.; Wurst,
K.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2002, 8, 3635-3645. (b)
Roques, N.; Maspoch, D.; Domingo, N.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.;
Tejada, J.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. Chem. Commun. 2005, 4801-4803.
(c) Maspoch, D.; Domingo, N.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.; Tejada,
J.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. C. R. Chem. 2005, 8, 1213.
(7) Maspoch, D.; Domingo, N.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.; Tejada, J.;
Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 730-731.
(8) Maspoch, D.; Domingo, N.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Vaughan, G.; Wurst,
K.; Tejada, J.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 1828-1832.
(9) (a) Maspoch, D.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J.
Dalton Trans. 2004, 1073-1082. (b) Maspoch, D.; Ruiz-Molina, D.;
Wurst, K.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1164-1165.
(c) Maspoch, D.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J.
Chem. Commun. 2002, 2958-2959.
X-ray powder diffraction studies were performed in the Serveis
Cient´ıfico-Te`cnics de la UB. The polycrystalline samples were
gently ground and placed in Lindemann capillary tubes of 0.2 mm
of diameter. A Debye-Scherrer geometry diffractometer INEL
CPS-120 (radius ) 250 mm) was used. The radiation used was Cu
KR1 (λ ) 1.540598 Å), with a working power of 40 KV (30 mA).
The detector was sensitive to 120° position, with 4096 measure
channels. The equipment contents a Germanium(111) flat primary
monochromator and a reflector mirror from OSMIC Gutman Optics
(13B-413). The beam height was 2-3 mm for all samples, and its
width was 0.1 mm. Calibration was performed using Na2Ca2Al2F13
(NAC) as an external reference (cubic function SPLINE). Linear-
ization was done with the PEAKOC software (from INEL). Typical
measurement times were about 3 h.
(10) Maspoch, D.; Ruiz-Molina, D.; Wurst, K.; Domingo, N.; Cavallini,
M.; Biscarini, F.; Tejada, J.; Rovira, C.; Veciana, J. Nature Mater.
2003, 2, 190-195.
(11) Davies, J. A.; Hockensmith, C. A.; Kukushkin, V. Y.; Kukushkin, Y.
N. Synthetic Coordination Chemistry: Principles and Practice; World
Scientific: London, 1996; p 58.
(12) (a) Lawrence, G. A. Chem. ReV. 1986, 86, 17-33. (b) Smith, G.;
Cloutt, B. A.; Lynch, D. E.; Byriel, K. A.; Kennard, C. H. L. Inorg.
Chem. 1998, 37, 3236-3242. (c) Dalrymple, A. A.; Shimizu, G. K.
H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2224-2225.
(13) Cote´, A. P.; Shimizu, G. K. H. Coord. Chem ReV. 2003, 245, 49-64.
(14) (a) Kaschak, D. M.; Johnson, S. A.; Hooks, D. E.; Kim, H.-N.; Ward,
M. D.; Mallouk, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10887-10894.
(b) Clearfield, A. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 47, 371-510.
(15) (a) Shimizu, G. K. H.; Enright, G. D.; Ratcliffe, C. I.; Rego, G. S.;
Reid, J. L.; Ripmeester, J. A. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 3282-3283.
(b) Shimizu, G. K. H.; Enright, G. D.; Ratcliffe, C. I.; Preston, K. F.;
Reid, J. L.; Ripmeester, J. A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1485-1486. (c)
May, L. J.; Shimizu, G. K. H. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 217-220.
(16) Ma¨kinen, S. K.; Melcer, N. J.; Parvez, M.; Shimizu, G. K. H. Chem.s
Eur. J. 2001, 7, 5176-5182.
5384 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 14, 2006