´
4421
V. Markovic et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 4416–4421
Table 3
The most significant descriptors for antiproliferative activity on MDA-MB-361 cells selected by heuristic method
Whole set (n = 25)
1a–1l (n = 12)
1m–1y (n = 13)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
r
r
r
r
r
2 = 0.7154 F = 57.81
2 = 0.7014 F = 54.02
2 = 0.6843 F = 49.86
2 = 0.6767 F = 48.13
2 = 0.6422 F = 41.28
qFHBSA
r
r
r
r
r
2 = 0.7905 F = 37.74
2 = 0.7745 F = 34.34
2 = 0.7569 F = 31.13
2 = 0.6659 F = 19.93
2 = 0.6371 F = 17.55
2SICavg
1CICavg
2BICavg
SZX
r
r
r
2 = 0.7776 F = 38.47
2 = 0.6688 F = 22.21
2 = 0.6284 F = 18.60
qf-FHDCA
eFPSA-3
eFPSA-3
HA-dep qHDCA-1/TMSA
f-HA-dep qHDCA-1/TMSA
f-HA-dep qHDCA-2/TMSA
f-qHDSA
2CIC
r2 = 0.5810 F = 15.25
qFHDCA
VC
r
2 = 0.5788 F = 15.11
avg
qFHBSA—fractional H-bonding charged surface area (HBSA) [Semi-MO PC]; eFPSA-3—fractional partial positive charged surface area (PPSA-3) [Zefirov’s PC]; HA-dep qHDCA-1/
TMSA—H-acceptor dependent H-donor charged surface area relative to total molecular surface area (HDCA-1/TMSA) [Semi-MO PC]; 2CIC—complementary information
content (order 2); qFHDCA—fractional H-donor charged surface area [Semi-MO PC]; 2SICavg—average structural information content (order 2); 1CICavg—average comple-
mentary information content (order 1); 2BICavg—average bonding information content (order 2); SZX—ZX Shadow; Vavg—average valency of a carbon atom; HA-dep qHDCA-2/
C
TMSA—H-acceptor dependent H-donor charged surface area relative to total molecular surface area (HDCA-2/TMSA) [Semi-MO PC]; qHDSA—H-donors surface area [Semi-MO
PC].
Note: f- prefix denotes a fragmental descriptor.
as ZX Shadow (SZX, r2 = 0.6659). Concerning subset 2, fractional
References and notes
descriptors appear to be more important, and they are connected
with hydrogen bonding donor/acceptor ability of the fragment at
1. Himly, M.; Jahn-Schmid, B.; Pittertschatscher, K.; Bohle, B.; Grubmayr, K.;
Ferreira, F.; Ebner, H.; Ebner, C. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 111, 882.
position
4 of pyrazol-5-one, including: f-Fractional H-donor
2. Watanabe, T.; Tahara, M.; Todo, S. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2008, 26, 101.
3. Abe, S.; Kirima, K.; Tsuchiya, K.; Okamoto, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Houchi, H.;
Yoshizumi, M.; Tamaki, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 186.
4. Braña, M. F.; Gradillas, A.; Ovalles, A. G.; López, B.; Acero, N.; Llinares, F.; Muñoz
Mingarro, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 9.
Charged Surface Area (qf-FHDCA, r2 = 0.7776), f-H-acceptor Depen-
dent H-donor Charged Surface Area relative to Total Molecular Sur-
face Area (f-HA-dep qHDCA-1/TMSA, r2 = 0.6284), f-H-donors
Surface Area (f-qHDSA, r2 = 0.5788). The correlation coefficients of
those descriptors with activity are pretty high, which again indi-
cates that once the rest of the structure is fixed by additional
hydrophobic interactions of phenyl ring with hypothetical hydro-
phobic pocket of target, and size and shape of molecules basic
selection provides good fitting with active place, the activity on
the target mostly depends on fragment at position 4. Generally,
compounds from subset 2, containing phenyl ring, showed slightly
better activities on both cells tested.
5. Kimata, A.; Nakagawa, H.; Ohyama, R.; Fukuuchi, T.; Ohta, S.; Suzuki, T.; Miyata,
N. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 5053.
6. Kakiuchi, Y.; Sasaki, N.; Satoh-Masuoka, M.; Murofushi, H.; Murakami-
Murofushi, K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 320, 1351.
7. Tripathy, R.; Ghose, A.; Singh, J.; Bacon, E. R.; Angeles, T. S.; Yang, S. X.; Albom,
M. S.; Aimone, L. D.; Herman, J. L.; Mallamo, J. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007,
17, 1793.
8. Van de Vrie, W.; Jonker, A. M.; Marquet, R. L.; Eggermont, A. M. M. J. Cancer Res.
Clin. Oncol. 1994, 120, 533.
9. Longhi, A.; Ferrari, S.; Bacci, G.; Specchia, S. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2007, 18, 737.
10. Kimura, Y.; Okuda, H. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90, 765.
11. Pevarello, P.; Brasca, M. G.; Amici, R.; Orsini, P.; Traquandi, G.; Corti, L.; Piutti,
C.; Sansonna, P.; Villa, M.; Pierce, B. S.; Pulici, M.; Giordano, P.; Martina, K.;
Fritzen, E. L.; Nugent, R. A.; Casale, E.; Cameron, A.; Ciomei, M.; Roletto, F.;
Isacchi, A.; Fogliatto, G.; Pesenti, E.; Pastori, W.; Marsiglio, A.; Leach, K. L.; Clare,
P. M.; Fiorentini, F.; Varasi, M.; Vulpetti, A.; Warpehoski, M. A. J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 3367.
12. Pevarello, P.; Brasca, M. G.; Orsini, P.; Traquandi, G.; Longo, A.; Nesi, M.; Orzi, F.;
Piutti, C.; Sansonna, P.; Varasi, M.; Cameron, A.; Vulpetti, A.; Roletto, F.; Alzani,
R.; Ciomei, M.; Albanese, C.; Pastori, W.; Marsiglio, A.; Pesenti, E.; Fiorentini, F.;
Bischoff, J. R.; Mercurio, C. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 2944–2956.
13. Wallace, D. J.; Straley, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 3825.
In conclusion, QSAR analysis supported the hypothesis that
investigated compounds act by inhibiting the enzymes included
in tumorogenesis rather than as free radical scavengers. Heuristic
method showed that the most significant factors for activity of
the compounds are geometrical and topological, including size
and shape of the molecule. It could also be concluded that aromatic
ring at position 1 of pyrazol-5-one plays significant role in hydro-
phobic interactions, whilst substituents connected to amino group
at position 4 mainly interact by formation of hydrogen bonds with
active place.
14. General procedure for the preparation of 1a–1e and 1m–1q.
A mixture of
aldehyde (1.5 mmol), amine (3 mmol) and p-toluenesulphonic acid
monohydrate (0.011 g, 0.06 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was heated to reflux
for 2 h. After cooling, the precipitate was filtered off, washed with a little cold
ethanol and dried in vacuo over anhydrous CaCl2.
Acknowledgments
General procedure for the preparation of 1f–1l and 1r–1y. A mixture of aldehyde
(1.5 mmol) and amino acid (1.8 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was heated to reflux
for 4 h. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure, 40 mL of water
was added and the suspension was stirred for additional 1 h at room
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Science and Techno-
logical Development of the Republic of Serbia for financial support
(Grant Nos 172016 and 175011).
temperature. The precipitate was filtered off, washed with
chloroform and dried in vacuo over anhydrous CaCl2.
a little cold
15. Belmar, J.; Pérez, F. R.; Alderete, J.; Zúñiga, C. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2005, 16, 179.
16. Thaker, B. T.; Surati, K. R.; Oswal, S.; Jadeja, R. N.; Gupta, V. K. Struct. Chem.
2007, 18, 295.
Supplementary data
17. Holzer, W.; Kautsch, C.; Laggner, C.; Claramunt, R. M.; Pérez-Torralba, M.;
Alkorta, I.; Elguero, J. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6791.
18. Liedtke, C.; Wang, J.; Tordai, A.; Symmans, W. F.; Hortobagyi, G. N.; Kiesel, L.;
Hess, K.; Baggerly, K. A.; Coombes, K. R.; Pusztai, L. Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
2010, 121, 301.
Supplementary data (spectral data, Treatment of tumor cell
lines, Flow cytometry analysis, in vitro angiogenesis assay and
QSAR analysis) associated with this article can be found, in the on-